Education
See other Education Articles
Title: WIKILeaks fills the sidebar on LF
Source:
LF
URL Source: http://hereonLF
Published: Nov 1, 2016
Author: buckeroo
Post Date: 2016-11-01 19:47:41 by buckeroo
Keywords: None
Views: 22176
Comments: 64
LF used to be a GREAT place to discuss politics and other matters without regard to WikiLeaks. Currently, and everday, the same ol' story ... WIKI this or WIKI that are unaccounted for because, quite frankly, anyone can send shit into Julian Assange's server making shit up. Latched onto total BULLSHIT, we have "nolu chan" sucking Assange's asshole. It is amazing to see people think that WikiLeaks has any standards at all.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.
#3. To: buckeroo (#0)
Wikileaks is publishing the e-mails collected from various people. It's embarrassing for Hillary Clinton and her campaign, and will be part of the factors that bring her down to defeat. So, here's a hearty "Well done!" to Julian Assange. I'm a fan.
You have no idea if the BS you read from Assange is true. There is no AUTHENTICATION of the BS.
You don't really give a fuck if the last 10 bimbos reporting inappropriate behavior on Trumps part was true... so you don't say anything about that you filthy closet leftest pile of dog shit.
If Trump's bimbos want to eat shit, that OK with me. Why are you so grievous this evening?
Why are you so obviously leftest this evening? I think I liked you better when you tried to fool posters you were somewhat conservative.
I am an ultraconservative. Your pal, Rush Limbaugh along with you, are ultraliberals. Get it through your head.
BULLSHIT! You are a Paultard asshole libertarian. Libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.
Wow - so conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending? I thought I had heard otherwise ...
I thought I had heard otherwise ... TooConsevative, it is no surprise that you often hear only what you wish to believe.
"Wow - so conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending? I thought I had heard otherwise ..." it is no surprise that you often hear only what you wish to believe. So I heard wrong - conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending?
"Wow - so conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending? I thought I had heard otherwise ..." it is no surprise that you often hear only what you wish to believe. So I heard wrong - conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending? Did I say that “conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending?” No, I did not. I said that “libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.” It is clear that the modern libertarian movement has its roots in radicalism rather than any sort of conservatism. However, since its initial beginnings within the context of the radical Left, much of the libertarian movement has turned sharply rightward, though in varying and often conflicting ways. This essay will argue that this rightward shift within the libertarian movement is severely misguided, as libertarianism and conservatism are not only historically antagonistic to one another but are indeed diametrical opposites. […] https://attackthesystem.com/beyond- conservatism-reclaiming-the-radical-roots-of-libertarianism/.
No, I did not. I said that “libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.” How can they be "polar opposites" if they agree on lower taxes and lower spending?
An LBJ Rockefeller Republican of 1964 explains Gatlin (libtardism), and why he hates libertarian conservatives.
Oh, Libertarian Party… You could have had me. You were this close! I am the demographic you are trying to reach out to: disenfranchised with the Republican Party presidential nominee; a lover of liberty not of political parties; someone searching for a new place to call home that represents the ideas I hold dear to my heart. I was optimistically hopeful. I spent my entire day tuned into the Libertarian Party convention hoping to see the legitimacy that I was yearning for. Would this be my new place to put my trust? Behind lovers of liberty like myself who wanted to make legitimate change, wanted to be taken seriously, and wanted to defend life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Nope. I didn’t find that while watching the Libertarian Party convention. How can we make legitimate change and be taken seriously with the buffoonery I witnessed during the convention? People like presidential candidate Darryl Perry losing his poise, screaming and pounding the podium, not only during the Saturday night debate but also during his concession speech. How about the poor Libertarian Party chair, Nicholas Sarwark, who I legitimately felt sorry for throughout the whole event? He struggled to maintain order during the chaotic convention. How can the Libertarian Party say they defend life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness when their presidential candidate doesn't represent those values? There is no pro-life candidate in the 2016 election. The Libertarian Party should have represented that. There is no pro-2nd amendment candidate ticket in the 2016 election. Again, the Libertarian Party should have represented that. And if the Libertarian Party candidate doesn’t support religious freedom, then how can they support me pursuing my own happiness? This is disappointing. I was gleefully optimistic about potentially becoming a member of the Libertarian Party. I spent a lot of time mulling it over and planned to use the convention to seal the deal for me. Well... they definitely solidified my decision, it just isn't the same one I initially had coming into the convention. The Libertarian Party gave a platform to several foolish people that took away from the potential influx of weary ex-GOP voters, like myself. The passionate candidates for liberty, some who were truly inspirational, were over shadowed by chaos. This was the Libertarian Party's shot at winning over the average American who feels that neither the GOP nor the Democrats represent them. And for conservatives like me, you just blew it. http://www.thelibertyconservative.com/libertarian-party-blew- converts/.
#39. To: Gatlin (#38)
I'm sure in your deluded mind you think that - your posts here display that you are just the opposite.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: Vicomte13 (#3)
#5. To: buckeroo (#4)
You have no idea if the BS you read from Assange is true. There is no AUTHENTICATION of the BS.
#6. To: GrandIsland (#5)
#10. To: buckeroo (#6)
Why are you so grievous this evening?
#11. To: GrandIsland (#10)
I think I liked you better when you tried to fool posters you were somewhat conservative.
#14. To: buckeroo (#11)
I am an ultraconservative.
#23. To: Gatlin (#14)
(Edited)
Libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.
#25. To: ConservingFreedom (#23)
#26. To: Gatlin (#25)
Libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.
#29. To: ConservingFreedom (#26)
Libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.
[…]
#32. To: Gatlin (#29)
Did I say that “conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending?”
#34. To: ConservingFreedom, Deckard, tater tot, Gatlin, neocon progressives, confused liberals (#32)
(Edited)
#38. To: hondo68, Asshhole Paultards (#34)
Replies to Comment # 38. Behind lovers
#55. To: Gatlin (#38)
I am...a lover of liberty
End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]