Cult Watch
See other Cult Watch Articles
Title: BREAKING: Glenn Beck endorses Constitution Party nominee Darrell Castle
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://theconservatarianreview.com/ ... -party-nominee-darrell-castle/
Published: Nov 1, 2016
Author: The Conservatarian Review
Post Date: 2016-11-01 10:15:23 by Vinny
Keywords: None
Views: 7140
Comments: 23
In a preview of tonight’s edition of VICE News, Glenn Beck has revealed that he cannot vote for Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. Instead, he is going to vote for Constitution Party nominee Darrell Castle. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
#6. To: Vinny, *Constitution Party* (#0)
At least he's not wasting his vote on a Republican Democrat. Or shilling for Hillary, like Lush Rimbaugh and Spawn Hannity. Trump is very close to Jill Stein.
I stopped reading at the first issue -- healthcare. The positions on both candidates are the same, and Trump has provided much more detail on what he wants to do. Yet Castle gets an 8.5 and Trump gets a 5? What a bunch of bullshit.
Yes, Trump has admitted that he's a socialized medicine communist, like Hillary. They worship Jonathan Gruber. Darrel Castle is an American capitalist. The government has no place in medicine, drugs, or forcing their crappy health care on us. They can't even perform their primary function, to protect the States against invasion. Let's see them do that, before they get any more funding. "The government's going to pay for it".
Sure. As they are now with Medicaid and Medicare. But Trump is proposing private insurance for the rest and block-granting Medicaid to the states. What's Castle's plan, by the way? Why does he get an 8.5?
#13. To: All (#12)
You know I wonder how many politicians have been elected over the years by lying their ass off?
James Madison said: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined.” (Federalist Papers #45) “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (Amendment X) The Constitution Party opposes the governmentalization and bureaucratization of American medicine. Government regulation and subsidy constitutes a threat to both the quality and availability of patient-oriented health care and treatment. Hospitals, doctors, and other health care providers should be accountable to patients – not to politicians, insurance bureaucrats, or HMO Administrators. If the supply of medical care is controlled by the federal government, then officers of that government will determine which demand is satisfied. The result will be the rationing of services, higher costs, poorer results – and the power of life and death transferred from caring physicians to unaccountable political overseers. We denounce any civil government entity using age or any other personal characteristic to: preclude people and insurance firms from freely contracting for medical coverage; conscript such people into socialized medicine, e.g., Medicare; or prohibit these people from using insurance payments and/or their own money to obtain medical services in addition to, or to augment the quality of, those services prescribed by the program. We applaud proposals for employee-controlled “family coverage” health insurance plans based on cash value life insurance principles. The federal government has no Constitutional provision to regulate or restrict the freedom of the people to have access to medical care, supplies or treatments. We advocate, therefore, the elimination of the federal Food and Drug Administration, as it has been the federal agency primarily responsible for prohibiting beneficial products, treatments, and technologies here in the United States that are freely available in much of the rest of the civilized world. We affirm freedom of choice of practitioner and treatment for all citizens for their health care. We support the right of patients to seek redress of their grievances through the courts against insurers and/or HMO’s. We condemn the misrepresentations made by the Federal Administration in securing passage of the recently enacted Medicare prescription drug bill, and the use of such legislation to secure government subsidies to special interests, such as the HMOs, and to protect the artificially high cost to consumers of prescription drugs.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#8. To: hondo68 (#6)
#9. To: misterwhite, Romney Gruber commies (#8)
(Edited)
Trump has provided much more detail on what he wants to do. Yet Castle gets an 8.5 and Trump gets a 5?
#12. To: hondo68 (#9)
"The government's going to pay for it".
Replies to Comment # 12.
#15. To: misterwhite, elimnate the FDA (#12)
(Edited)
What's Castle's plan, by the way? Why does he get an 8.5?
Healthcare and Government
RESOLUTION:
Repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka Obama Care)
State Model Emergency Health Powers Act
Protecting Citizens’ Privacy
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]