Other
See other Other Articles
Title: Cars That Broke Bad (Or just Broke)
Source:
Eric Peters Autos
URL Source: http://ericpetersautos.com/2016/10/29/cars-broke-bad-just-broke/
Published: Oct 29, 2016
Author: Eric
Post Date: 2016-10-31 11:03:21 by Deckard
Ping List: *Cars and Automotive* Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*
Keywords: None
Views: 1345
Comments: 5
Automotive good ideas gone bad range far and wide – whether it’s a classic fail like the exploding Pintos of the early ’70s – or a late-model train wreck like the Pontiac Aztek. Here are ten automotive atrocities that will be remembered for as long as the warranty claims (and class-action lawsuits) linger: * The entire American Motors Corp. (AMC) lineup – From dreadful dreadnoughts like the malformed Matador to demented detritus like the Gremlin and Pacer, no other automaker ever managed to build such a seemingly endless conga line of bizarre, poorly conceived (and often, poorly built) cars within such a short span of time (from the late 1960s to the early-mid 1970s). Only bankruptcy eventually succeeded in stopping the madness. * Chrysler’s “lean burn” engines – While Honda was developing highly efficient combustion chambers to lower engine emissions via engineering advances such as the CVCC cylinder head (which allowed the cars to meet federal exhaust emissions standards without catalytic converters) Chrysler was duct-taping its V8s with leaned-out carburetors that mainly made them even harder to start than they were before – and prone to stalling in the middle of busy intersections. In addition, you also got gelded performance and terrible gas mileage. Now you know why “rich, Corinthian leather” never made a comeback. * General Motors’ diesel V8 – Imagine a luxury car that was both slow and inefficient as well as prone to early and catastrophic engine failures and you have a taste of the bitter flavor that was the diesel-powered Oldsmobiles and Cadillacs of the late ’70s and early ’80s. These “diesel” engines were actually converted gas engines, which (contrary to the myth) wasn’t the problem. Poor quality control was. The resultant debacle not only soured an entire country on the otherwise perfectly sound concept it helped hustle Oldsmobile to the boneyard of automotive has-beens and nearly killed off Cadillac, too. * The Sterling – Japanese automakers rarely screw the pooch, but this was an exception. Back in the late 1980s, in collusion with British car-maker Land Rover, Acura Legends were re-sold as “British” Sterling 825s and 827s. The alliance was as enduring as the Hitler-Stalin non-aggression pact – and just as awkward. Parts for these cars – especially interior pieces – are all but impossible to find. Dealer support is nonexistent. Resale values are lower than current highs for well-worn Yugos. If Truman had had another bomb left to drop, the childhood home of the dude who would grow up to create Sterling would have been a worthy target. * Pontiac Fiero – A great idea ruined by upper management skinflints and con men – who thought it would be slick take Chevette underthings (front suspension, engine) and put them in a car that looked sporty and then charge the suckers top dollar. First-year sales were great – until the word got out. They then nose-dived into the ground like the Air France Concorde, forcing the car’s cancellation just four years after it came out. Just in time to hand over the entire market for a car of this type to Mazda, which brought out the Miata a year after the Fiero was sent to the crusher. * “Cab forward” design – When Chrysler Corp. hawked this layout in the ’90s, it was supposed to be an automotive Great Leap Forward. But after a succession of belly-flops ranging from the luckless LHS to the Dodge not-so-Intrepid, the whole works was discreetly packed up and shipped off to the land of unwanted toys. Chrysler reverted back to front-engine/rear-drive (cab normal) vehicles like the current 300 series and Charger – which, not surprisingly, actually sell well. * Geo – Circa Ronald Reagan’s first term, GM was desperate to rehab its image – especially as purveyor of small economy cars, most of which (so far) sucked. Management figured the only way to get people to consider buying a GM small car was by selling them under a different name. Hence the Geo nameplate. Sold alongside Chevrolets, some Geos were ok. The Prizm was a re-badged Toyota Corolla – and the Corolla was (and still is) a solid little car. Others, though, were far from fabulous – notably the depressing three-cylinder Metro and the sad-sack Storm (more like a light breeze). Geos may sometimes still be glimpsed languishing on seedy used car lots in rural backwaters to this very day. * The “new” GTO – The Holden (GM’s Australian subsidiary) Monaro was a perfectly good car – but it was neither a Pontiac nor a GTO. Tacking on the badges didn’t make it so. It didn’t help that the resurrected “GTO” was blandly styled (it looked a lot like a hot-rodded Cavalier) and close to Corvette expensive – making it all but impossible for even the handful of rednecks who might have wanted one to afford one. Pontiac itself gave up the ghost not long after. * Firestone’s Wilderness A/T tires – Mix marginally competent drivers, top-heavy SUVs, high-speed driving and under-inflated, poor-quality tires – and let the barrel-rolling (and endless litigation) begin! This late 1990s debacle all-but-ruined the reputation of what had been the country’s best-selling SUV – the Explorer – even though the root cause of the problem had more to do with improper use and sketchy tires than with the “Exploder” itself. * Chevy SSR – What’s heavy, ugly, top-heavy and clunky? No, it’s not your mother-in-law. It’s the SSR, or Super Sport Retractable hardtop. Blechh! GM built this Frankenstinian atrocity for a few years in the early-mid 2000s. It looked like a bloated ’40s pick-up and had some interesting features – including a “torque-o-meter” gauge to let you know how much power the Corvette sourced V8 was putting out. But like the even more execrable Plymouth Prowler, it was a fake hot rod – a factory-built, store-bought Guidomobile for guys who wanted to be seen as gearhead car-crafter types but who probably couldn’t find the dipstick on a dare. 
Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
I actually liked my little banana-yellow Geo Storm hatchback quite a lot for what it was and, having bought it new at a discount, was able to sell it for a $200 profit when I bought an SUV to replace it.
My Geo-Prizm was a pretty solid car.
We had one of those caddy's and when it was good it was the best. Tank that actually got 22 city and 29 hwy. Power to spare. Great idea. They fck it up by trying to use a gasoline block instead of beefed up diesel engine. My father loved that car until the engine crapped out. Then GM's answer was that you did not changed the oil like you were suppose too. That was a mistake on their part because he kept records. Then they hit him up with everything and the kitchen sink. I think it still cost him $3-4k. He was not a happy man.
Im pretty sure it was a design flaw. To thin of walls over heated the oil which gummed it up plus thin walls caused wall fracturing. I agree great idea but poor design.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
Sold alongside Chevrolets, some Geos were ok. The Prizm was a re-badged Toyota Corolla – and the Corolla was (and still is) a solid little car.
#3. To: Deckard (#0)
"... whether it’s a classic fail like the exploding Pintos of the early ’70s"
#4. To: Deckard (#0)
* General Motors’ diesel V8 –
#5. To: Deckard (#0)
These “diesel” engines were actually converted gas engines, which (contrary to the myth) wasn’t the problem. Poor quality control was.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]