United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: WIKILEAKS - she needs a more trivial approach to her arsenal [dumb millenials are followers]
Source:
WIKILEAKS
URL Source: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/34866
Published: Oct 28, 2016
Author: wendybeth26
Post Date: 2016-10-28 10:46:54 by nolu chan
Ping List: *WIKILEAKS* Subscribe to *WIKILEAKS*
Keywords: None
Views: 2424
Comments: 26
WIKILEAKS - she needs a more trivial approach to her arsenal [dumb millenials are followers] https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/34866 Begin forwarded message: From: wendy Reviewed the memo -> And still no mention of driving young people just high level references to groups like AA, Hispanic & Women. It's sad but I'd also advise she needs a more trivial approach to her an arsenal. BS has made his campaign/movement symbiotic with a pop culture trend. HRC needs this kind of infusion to pull younger voters. And she may not be the best face of it so so maybe it's trending figures to advocate for her b/c that's the crap that young people pay attention to. I hate to generalize a generation but by social media nature, they "follow". So if someone they identify as cool endorses - they will likely fall in line with that candidate. (Don't forget Bill had "don't stop" campaign song, that was a pop culture play and had his Saxophone moments. It's fucking dumb but being "cool" counts for more than it maybe should) - - - - - - - - - - [Note] Miley: They have decided they need a more trivial approach. Drop everything, act cool, and go do something fucking dumb for them, because the millenials are that fucking dumb that they will follow like sheep. So say the geriatrics.
Subject: Re: Mook Memo-March Matters
Date: February 10, 2016 at 10:05:58 AM EST
To: Mbronfein
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nolu chan (#0)
LOL oh how the life of demagogues is simple. Been sharing all your Wikileaks sources (sanitized of course since we don't want slobbering liberals over here) over at CF. LOL the responses are rich. There are atheist liberals over there, and some Christians, who have no idea of the existence of Comey's presser comments nor the FBI 302s. The FBI 302s make their head explode because the link goes directly to the FBI site. LOL. Not going to convince these bots of course. However, there may be some who did not know all the facts and sources out there and now they do and may go vote against Hitlery. So Ser Nolu Chan, you may be the key cog to Hitlery's downward trend in the recent polls. Clinton lead shrinks, even as nearly 6 in 10 expect her to win, Post-ABC tracking poll finds And this: Trump will win the election and is more popular than Obama in 2008, AI system finds
This stuff reaches the millenials via Twitter and Facebook. And Jason Chaffetz just announced that the FBI has reopened its email investigation. Maybe Hillary needs to be cleared again. Maybe the FBI was embarrassed into it. This stuff gets worse every day. I like the one where Google notified Podesta that someone in the Ukraine had his password and tried to log into his account. Just when they had almost convinced me it was the Russians.
LOL. All sorts of angles on why Comey re-opened the investigation now. My hunch is this is a whole lot of nothing. Other than Comey was alerted to the additional emails and probably knew Gowdy has contacts in the agency so decided to come clean. Not give the GOP and Trump the headline that the FBI was hiding evidence with Congress in recess.
I just don't know. There are loads of potential that could be in Huma's emails. And they may need Bleachbit for Carlos Danger and little Carlos. There must be a trove of email between Podesta and Hillary. That bombshell has yet to explode, but it is surely coming. Wikileaks is running a wrecking ball over Hillary.
What if hrc was sharing classified material with Uma that she should not have and Uma in turn shared with weiner-head?.....Not sure how much access Uma would have to classified info given her position but sharing with the weiner?....definitely a no-no. Hopefully it all leads back to hrc......
Welcome to the insane asylum hope you have fun here. :)
Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
What was the cause of the war between the North & South?
That's not really an if. It's a matter of how many. Any sharing of classified information via non-secure email is improper. - - - Hillary and Huma - classified on nonsecure email. This was sent by Hillary to Huma at her clintonemail account and by Huma from her clinton email account to Huma at her Yahoo email account. The recently found emails were in possession of Carlos Danger. Remember, the Weiners separated in August. They busted Carlos Danger. She does not live with him any more. Not only does Carlos Danger not have a clearance, I doubt they can give him one to make believe they are retroactively clearing up the mess.
The answer depends on if you were in the North or the South.....
Lol forgot Weiner used Carlos as a chat moniker. As I mentioned on another forum...where is Weiner? Did he cop a plea and now holed up in the Hoover building?
Or Huma was the interlocutor for the campaign with Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood. I'll take a stab that we may be looking at espionage charges against Huma if there was an honest DoJ.
Wow.
You are not in a court of law requiring some 'beats me' response. If you are a buff of and about the War between the North & South, you should have a sensible opinion beyond wearing:
It really does depend on whether you were from the North or the South as there were 2 distinct POV's (at least) of the cause of the CW. Not sure what your "court of law' comment has to do with my response since I never said "beats me"; if you have an understaning of the CW you would know my statement is correct.....sorry you don't like it.
Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
I read that the incriminating evidence was in a folder called "life insurance", any truth to that?
I believe the comment was made sarcastically. There was a great big Wikileaks file called "insurance."
Did he cop a plea and now holed up in the Hoover building? I don't know where he is holed up, but he is cooperating with the FBI. If he has something to offer, he needs help with Dikileaks. Huma is holed up in her NYC apartment. She is in deep kimshee. Her claim that she does not know how 600K+ emails got on the computer is not good enough. She has a massive conflict with her statement under oath. If Huma cuts a deal, she could have stories to tell. If she does not, she could be the next Martha Stewart.
Unless hrc wins and gives Huma a pardon; heck, oblunder could do the same for hrc....after all what has he got to lose?
Has unpardoning been tested in the courts yet?
An Obama pardon might not protect Hillary for all of her crimes. "The power to pardon applies only to offenses against the laws of the jurisdiction of which the pardoning official is the chief executive. Thus the president may only pardon for violations of federal law, and governors may only pardon for violations of the laws of their states." http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Presidential+pardon
The president's pardoning power is plenary and not subject to judicial review.
Yeah but. The court could rule differently.
Under Article 2, Section 2, Clause 1, "The President ... shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment." The power has always been interpreted to be without limitation. A pardon may not be reversed by any lawful process. One can speculate that the Supreme Court might act extra-judicially to assume jurisdiction and do it again to render an opinion.
Trump would use the angle that he wasn't really president. I know it isn't happening.
#2. To: redleghunter (#1)
#3. To: nolu chan (#2)
I like the one where Google notified Podesta that someone in the Ukraine had his password and tried to log into his account. Just when they had almost convinced me it was the Russians.
#4. To: redleghunter (#3)
My hunch is this is a whole lot of nothing.
#5. To: redleghunter (#3)
My hunch is this is a whole lot of nothing. Other than Comey was alerted to the additional emails and probably knew Gowdy has contacts in the agency so decided to come clean. Not give the GOP and Trump the headline that the FBI was hiding evidence with Congress in recess.
#6. To: civilwarbuff (#5)
#7. To: civilwarbuff (#5)
#8. To: civilwarbuff, redleghunter (#5)
What if hrc was sharing classified material with Uma that she should not have
#9. To: buckeroo (#7)
What was the cause of the war between the North & South?
#10. To: nolu chan (#4)
#11. To: civilwarbuff, Nolu Chan (#5)
What if hrc was sharing classified material with Uma that she should not have and Uma in turn shared with weiner-head?.....Not sure how much access Uma would have to classified info given her position but sharing with the weiner?....definitely a no-no. Hopefully it all leads back to hrc......
#12. To: nolu chan (#8)
#13. To: civilwarbuff (#9)
depends
#14. To: buckeroo (#13)
You are not in a court of law requiring some 'beats me' response. If you are a buff of and about the War between the North & South, you should have a sensible opinion beyond wearing:
#15. To: nolu chan (#0)
#16. To: nolu chan, redleghuntrr (#0)
#17. To: A K A Stone, redleghunter (#16)
I read that the incriminating evidence was in a folder called "life insurance", any truth to that?
#18. To: CZ82 (#15)
#19. To: redleghunter (#10)
As I mentioned on another forum...where is Weiner?
#20. To: nolu chan (#19)
Huma is holed up in her NYC apartment. She is in deep kimshee. Her claim that she does not know how 600K+ emails got on the computer is not good enough. She has a massive conflict with her statement under oath. If Huma cuts a deal, she could have stories to tell. If she does not, she could be the next Martha Stewart.
#21. To: civilwarbuff (#20)
#22. To: A K A Stone (#21)
#23. To: A K A Stone, civilwarbuff (#21)
Has unpardoning been tested in the courts yet?
#24. To: nolu chan (#23)
The president's pardoning power is plenary and not subject to judicial review.
#25. To: A K A Stone (#24)
Yeah but. The court could rule differently.
#26. To: nolu chan (#25)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]