[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: WIKILEAKS - Re: Draft Statement for HRC for Tues (comment) [initial BBerry/email lies written for HRC] Note: it looks like the staff wrote the best untruth unlikely to result in a perjury charge. The Attachment is an 8-page Word document that is a fun read blast from the recent past. WIKILEAKS - Re: Draft Statement for HRC for Tues (comment) [initial BBerry/email lies written for HRC] https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26319 Re: Draft Statement for HRC for Tues (comment) From:cheryl.mills@gmail.com Subject: Re: Draft Statement for HRC for Tues (comment) Kristing Not sure who is the keeper of the document but find an additional comment attached. I didn't cir to everyone to not clutter inboxes (I am having a hard time with mine)! thanks cdm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Mandy Grunwald wrote: Joel, Jim and I have drafted the following for HRC to say tomorrow: thx Mandy I think there has been some confusion out there about my emails as Secretary of State, so I want to talk about it directly. When I was in the Senate, I used a Blackberry for both work and personal emails. When I got to work as Secretary, I wanted to do the same thing. So I opted to use my personal email account - which was permitted by the department - because I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails, instead of two. A lot of you know, I'm not exactly a technological whiz. Looking back, it would have been better if I had simply used a second email account and carried a second phone, but at the time, this certainly didn't seem like an issue. I sent my work emails to government employees at their government addresses, which meant they were immediately preserved on the system at the State Department. After I left office, when the Department asked for all emails from former secretaries of state sent from their personal accounts, I responded right away and we have turned over all of my work related emails, which total roughly 55,000 printed pages. I have also asked that the State Department make all of these emails public so everyone can see them for themselves. *Mandy Grunwald* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----Original Message----- Cc: john.podesta ; Robby Mook ; Jennifer Palmier I ; Huma Abedin ; Philippe Reines ; Nick Merrill ; Cheryl Mills ; jbenenson ; jim.margolis@gmmb.com ; gruncom ; john ; Turner, Katherine ; Kendall, David Sent: Sun, Mar 8, 2015 3:30 pm Subject: Revised Q&A and Statement Revised Q&A and statement are attached, incorporating edits/comments from this morning. Thx - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *From:* Kristina Schake *Cc:* john.podesta@gmail.com, Robby Mook , JenniferPalmieri , Huma Abedin , Philippe Reines , Nick Merrill , Cheryl Mills , jbenenson@bsgco.com, jim.margolis@gmmb.com , gruncom@aol.com, john@algpolling.com, Turner, Katherine , Kendall, David Attached is Jen's press and surrogate plan. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Attachment: https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//fileid/26319/7358 2015-03-09 Q&A - 929a,.docx 45.57 KiB application/vnd.openxmlformats- officedocument.wordprocessingml.document At 3: No. How many emails were in her account? And how many of those were provided to the Department? Her email account contained a total of 62,320 sent and received emails from March 2009 to February 2013. Based on the review process described below, 30,490 of these emails were provided to the Department, and the remaining 31,830 were personal records. At 6-7: No. A separate, closed system was used by the Department for the sole purpose of handling classified communications which was designed to prevent such information from being transmitted anywhere other than within that system, including to outside email accounts. How did Secretary Clinton receive and consume classified information? The Secretary’s office is located in a secure area. Classified information was viewed in hard copy by the Secretary while in the office. While on travel, the Department has rigorous protocols for her and traveling staff to receive and transmit information of all types. Where was the server for her email located? The server for her email was physically located on her property, which is protected by the U.S. Secret Service. What level of encryption was employed? Who was the service provider, etc? The security and integrity of her electronic communications was taken seriously from the onset when it was first set up for President Clinton’s team. While the curiosity in the specifics of this set up is understandable, given what people with ill-intentions can do with such information in this day and age, there are concerns about broadcasting specific technical details about past and current practices. However, suffice it to say, robust protections were put in place and additional upgrades and techniques employed over time as they became available, including consulting and employing third party experts. Was the server ever hacked? No, there is no evidence there was ever a breach. Was there ever an unauthorized intrusion into her email or did anyone else have access to it? No. What was done after her email was exposed in February 2013 after Guciffer hacked Sid Blumenthal’s account? While this was not a breach of her account, because her email address was exposed, steps were taken at that time to ensure the security and integrity of her electronic communications. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nolu chan (#0)
Lets talk about "WikiLeaks" publications, shall we? Pure gossip, innuendo and probable BULLSHIT that has little to do with contemporaneous characteristics that make/break the electoral college. The Presidency is in the hands of creepy donators from each and every state of the union; the two party system is a TAKE ALL phenomena, called the electoral college.
john - John Anzalone, http://www.algpolling.com, Anzalone Liszt Grove Research (ALG), Democrat polling firm. Apparently, they poll lies to see how they will be received.
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|