International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Julian Assange’s Internet ‘Intentionally Severed By A State Party,’ Wikileaks Says
Source:
Daily Caller
URL Source: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/17/w ... ally-severed-by-a-state-party/
Published: Oct 17, 2016
Author: Peter Hasson
Post Date: 2016-10-17 06:23:00 by nolu chan
Keywords: None
Views: 10849
Comments: 34
Julian Assange’s Internet ‘Intentionally Severed By A State Party,’ Wikileaks Says Peter Hasson Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s internet link was severed by a state party, the organization claimed in a tweet early Monday morning. Wikileaks claims to have activated “appropriate contingency plans.” The announcement came hours after Wikileaks published three cryptic tweets Sunday afternoon referencing Ecuador, US Secretary of State John Kerry and the United Kingdom’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Each tweet was accompanied by a string of jumbled numbers and letters. - - - - - - - - - - WikiLeaks @wikileaks Julian Assange's internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans. 12:33 AM - 17 Oct 2016 - - - - - - - - - - WikiLeaks @wikileaks pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809 5:08 PM - 16 Oct 2016 - - - - - - - - - - WikiLeaks @wikileaks pre-commitment 2: Ecuador eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72 5:23 PM - 16 Oct 2016 - - - - - - - - - - WikiLeaks @wikileaks pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74 5:25 PM - 16 Oct 2016 - - - - - - - - - - Assange is currently residing in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, England, where he has remained since seeking political asylum in June 2012. (RELATED: Leaked Emails Show Clinton Campaign Struggling Over Gay Marriage Position) Kerry is currently in London as well for meetings with British, French and German foreign ministers regarding peace brokering attempts in Syria. Earlier this month, Assange claimed he was going to make a major announcement regarding Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton on the balcony of the embassy, but canceled due to “security concerns.” Over the last week and a half, Wikileaks has steadily released thousands of emails from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s Gmail account. Wikileaks previously released hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee that showed party officials colluding against Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. (RELATED: Wikileaks Cancels Major Clinton Revelation Amid ‘Security Concerns’) Critics of Wikileaks say the organization is acting as a front for Russian hackers, a charge Assange has denied. U.S. intelligence officials believe Russian hackers have been the source of the hacks. This is a developing story, check back for updates.
Reporter, Associate Editor
2:07 AM 10/17/2016
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.
#2. To: All (#0)
I very strongly suspect that it is Hillary behind the blocking of Assange and Snowden.
The immediate actor would be John Kerry, Secretary of State, who is in London. Obama and Hillary share a mutual interest to shut down Wikileaks.
There must be something big not released yet and the Obama admin and Hitlery know what it is. This is a significant trigger Kerry and the UK pulled today. It gives credence to just about every conspiracy theory the government can and will shut down your access to the internet if you get close too close to exposing their corruption. This is a bad Deckard thread coming to life. :-)
Wikileaks has documented crimes and utter corruption. The FBI 302's document criminal activity by State under Kerry as well as Clinton. The 302's are another amazing read. Something else is the Governance Report on the Clinton Foundation that Chelsea commissioned. It's sort of like Don Corleone tasked Freddo with such a report on the Corleone family business, thinking he was so incompetent it would be harmless. Chelsea commissioned some of the most competent experts to do a report on the family business. They did, expertly. It's unreal. Even in their staid language, it is damning. Wikileaks turns up the heat with every data dump. Restricting Assange from using the internet should have little or no effect. They are burying the Clintons is their own sewage, and it ain't pretty. This is something like V for Vendetta, building to a crescendo. The Clintons, Obama, Kerry and the Dems don't know what to do about it. The data files appear to be available in the wild in encrypted form. The hashes have been released. If the decryption keys are released, all who have the files can decrypt them and bombs away. The black hats are here, there, everywhere, and nowhere. And we have only seen about 25% of the Podesta files. It appears this shitstorm will go on every day until the election. In other, off-topic news, recall the marine officer who, on July 25, 2012 "transmitted classified data via an unsecure, commercial e-mail account, which led the Naval Criminal Investigative Service to investigate plaintiff’s handling of classified documents," and they found he had "stored more than 100 official documents, including classified documents, on his personal laptop and/or external storage device." He is the one who "warned Marines deployed in Afghanistan about a dangerous individual. On August 10, 2012—two weeks after that warning—three Marines were murdered in the Forward Operating Base Delhi gymnasium in Afghanistan." In a Federal lawsuit "Plaintiff asserts that senior Marine Corps officials have engaged in a 'concerted two-year long effort . . . to cover-up the severe lapses and other highly damaging misconduct that led to those murders' and that the current disciplinary proceedings are in furtherance of that 'cover-up.'" His separation from the service has been put on hold by a Federal court. On 10/14 the Court (EDNY) issued a Minute Order:
Thanks for that update. I thought they already buried those Marines in some corner of Leavenworth. Glad to see they are still fighting. Shall I assume the dangerous individual was part of a shadow organization of the CIA? I had three encounters in Iraq with the dangerous dupes at CIA. One was not so bad. I was in Indian country with 5 vehicles with 50cals searching for the BN XO who stopped to help one of our maintenance teams recover a vehicle. Lost coms. This was like a week after that convoy got lost and soldiers captured. A week later and the roads were still unsecured behind 3ID push north. We needed to link up with them to provide MLRS fires for the push into Baghdad. Instead of finding the XO (he and team were fine and showed up hours later) I run into three white pick trucks with armed Iraqis in non regime uniforms. The old chocolate chip unis. Fat American dude comes up and tells us to not shoot. He's in civilian clothes and immediately tells me he is a commando with special ops. Fat chance of that. He asks for some fuel and wants protection. I get him to an 82nd AB check point and he thanks me and told me I should be honored to have escorted the Iraqi free army. I look at the three pick up trucks and 17 Iraqi dudes told him he was going to need to get more. At that point I knew the CIA was a bust in Iraq. Second encounter two CIA operatives tried fooling an Army battalion into providing a raid force, security and JTAC to call in an air strike on one of their HVI missions. No one would be much the wiser but the Army battalion was in the Marine AO and got their CAS from the Marines. The Marines refused the CAS request because they knew nothing about such a mission in their sector. Of course the Marines punted their request to me as the regional OIC for air requests. I canvassed the various SOF LNOs and they too told me nothing was going on that they were involved in that night in the Marine sector. Fishy situation so I call the battalion direct and spoke with the Ops officer. After a long conversation I told him to report the operatives to higher, that the men were not SOF and if his unit killed anyone that night it would be illegal. Once I got the two star up and told him what was going on he dialed the USMC one star and put a halt to the mission. Unbelievable. They were going to use conventional units to do their dirty work. A week later the Marines investigated the incident and found out the guy the "operatives" wanted to kill was a key player in the Anbar peace talks. Third encounter was a year later when I worked for a two star HQs. Guy coming in to the G3 tells him he is OGA which is their "cover" term. I'm the senior network targo and pulled my boss aside and told him to throw the bum out the door. He instead hands me a stack of targets the OGA guy says would help us break up three major cells. When he left I went through the list and once again half the list were dudes we were either working with or the SOF guys were working with. Dude was trying to kill useful intel sources. They are complete morons. I hope these Marines did not get involved with these types of operatives.
#32. To: redleghunter (#27)
It's a bit early, but I think this one (Maj. Jason Brezler) may be winning with a claim of retaliation.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#8. To: nolu chan (#2)
#9. To: goldilucky (#8)
I very strongly suspect that it is Hillary behind the blocking of Assange and Snowden.
#19. To: nolu chan, Deckard (#9)
#25. To: redleghunter (#19)
There must be something big not released yet and the Obama admin and Hitlery know what it is. This is a significant trigger Kerry and the UK pulled today. It gives credence to just about every conspiracy theory the government can and will shut down your access to the internet if you get close too close to exposing their corruption.
There must be something big not released yet and the Obama admin and Hitlery know what it is. This is a significant trigger Kerry and the UK pulled today. It gives credence to just about every conspiracy theory the government can and will shut down your access to the internet if you get close too close to exposing their corruption.
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Joseph F. Bianco: Status Conference/oral argument held on 10/14/2016 ORDERED that 1) Defendants shall inform the Court no later than Wednesday, October 19, 2016 as to whether Defendants will voluntarily agree not to separate Plaintiff from the United States Marine Corps prior to December 1, 2016; 2) Defendants may voluntarily provide Plaintiff with discovery no later than October 25, 2016; and 3) if Defendants provide Plaintiff with discovery, Plaintiff may submit a letter response no later than October 26, 2016. (Court Reporter Maryann Steiger.) (Bollbach, Jean) (Entered: 10/14/2016)
#27. To: nolu chan (#25)
In other, off-topic news, recall the marine officer who, on July 25, 2012 "transmitted classified data via an unsecure, commercial e-mail account, which led the Naval Criminal Investigative Service to investigate plaintiff’s handling of classified documents," and they found he had "stored more than 100 official documents, including classified documents, on his personal laptop and/or external storage device." He is the one who "warned Marines deployed in Afghanistan about a dangerous individual. On August 10, 2012—two weeks after that warning—three Marines were murdered in the Forward Operating Base Delhi gymnasium in Afghanistan." In a Federal lawsuit "Plaintiff asserts that senior Marine Corps officials have engaged in a 'concerted two-year long effort . . . to cover-up the severe lapses and other highly damaging misconduct that led to those murders' and that the current disciplinary proceedings are in furtherance of that 'cover-up.'"
Replies to Comment # 27. Thanks for that update. I thought they already buried those Marines in some corner of Leavenworth. Glad to see they are still fighting.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]