As part of a side arrangement made in June, the FBI agreed to destroy the laptops of two of former secretary of state Hillary Clintons top aides after granting each immunity according to a letter House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) sent to Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Monday.
In the letter, Goodlatte alleges that the FBI promised to destroy the laptop of Clintons former chief-of-staff, Cheryl Mills, as well as the laptop of her ex-campaign staffer and deputy to Mills Heather Samuelson. The destruction of the evidence was agreed to take place after the FBI conducted its search.
It was also discovered from unnamed sources that the covert operation was to take place under strict time parameters, apparently in order to cover any tracks.
Sources said the arrangement with former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson also limited the search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015, Fox News reported. This meant investigators could not review documents for the period after the email server became public in turn preventing the bureau from discovering if there was any evidence of obstruction of justice, sources said.
Why destroy irrelevant info?
Looking for answers to figure out the true nature of the immunity deals, Goodlatte asked Lynch in his letter for an explanation as to why the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI agreed to the restrictive conditions, which included the FBIs promise that it would destroy the laptops at the conclusion of its search.
Like many things about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers, the Republican chairman expressed to the attorney general in the letter obtained by Fox News.
Goodlatte then questioned Lynch on the contradicting accounts that he observed.
Click for Full Text!