United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Eerie: Hacked Emergency Message Foreshadowed Devastating NJ Train Crash: “Would You? Could You? On a Train?”
Source:
SHTF Plan
URL Source: http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-ne ... -could-you-on-a-train_09292016
Published: Sep 29, 2016
Author: Mac Slavo
Post Date: 2016-09-30 10:49:48 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 7627
Comments: 40
The most horrific news of the day is undoubtedly the disastrous train crash in Hoboken, New Jersey that frightened everyone in the station, and killed at least one person as it went off its rails and crashed through the station. At least one hundred people were injured, and witnesses saw one of the most dramatic and unsettling accidental events in some time. “The next thing I know, I’m on the floor. We are plowing through something … and when the train came to a stop, I could see the parts of the roof on the first car and some of the debris next to me,” Shah said. (source) But it is the hacked message that happened hours before that makes this event truly creepy. Without any particular explanation, an emergency broadcast warning went out over WKTV 2 in Utica, NY that read: “Civil Authorities have issues a Hazardous Materials Warning for The United States. Effective until September 29, 02:16AM EDT. Would you. Could you. On a Train? Wait for further instructions.” Video of this bizarre message was recorded and posted to YouTube: The station quickly followed up correcting the record, stating that there is no emergency, blaming the message on FEMA test codes that were supposedly meant for testing the system internally, and not intended for public broadcast.: But, of course, that explanation does nothing to account for the words: “Would you. Could you. On a Train? Wait for further instructions.” In light of the train crash, this meaning could strongly indicate foul play and prior knowledge. Whoever hacked the station message or “internal codes” may have been communicating with one or more conspirators who are awaiting ‘instructions.’ Of course, that is all speculation. Right now, the train crash is being blamed on a lack of equipment used to slow down trains, and possibility human operator error. Authorities are investigating that angle. But there may well be more to the story – a side that isn’t likely to make headlines. So what is really going on? This makes at least the third strange and/or hacked broadcast in recent weeks… enough to start asking some bigger questions. First, authorities in Long Island, NY accidentally sent out an emergency evacuation order for the entire heavily populated island… when they supposedly only meant to warn visitors to a single beach that a storm was approaching and they shouldn’t be there. Then, an emergency broadcast station on 1630 AM out of New York, was heard 30-40 miles away in New Jersey with the bizarre message: “Trump Will Go 26th” repeating over and over. Was it some sort of veiled threat or coded communication? Or was it just meaningless noise in the system? 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 36.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
“Civil Authorities have issues a Hazardous Materials Warning for The United States. Effective until September 29, 02:16AM EDT. Would you. Could you. On a Train? Wait for further instructions.” The station quickly followed up correcting the record, stating that there is no emergency,blaming the message on FEMA test codes that were supposedly meant for testing the system internally, and not intended for public broadcast.: OMG, let no one ever believe that the system was being tested internally….because Deckard is peeing in his pants with excitement now that he has a new conspiracy theory to spread. Okay, everyone….GET PREPARED:
OMG, let no one ever believe that the system was being tested internally… "Would you. Could you. On a Train? Wait for further instructions.” That isn't a part of any EAS (Emergency Alert System) test I have ever seen. Piss off queerbait.
How many "internal" tests of the system have you ever seen?
How many "internal" tests of the system have you ever seen? You can't possibly be trying to claim that this cryptic message was generated internally by DHS can you?
How many "internal" tests of the system have you ever seen? You can't possibly be trying to claim that this cryptic message was generated internally by DHS can you? It was someone just internally testing the system and putting in some random message for the test and accidentally hit the transmit switch. You can't possibly be trying to claim that his cryptic message was generated by someone with foreknowledge that a train accident was going to happen are you? OMG....WAIT....YOU DO ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT. You have to be the weirdest most gullible asshole on the face of the earth.
Oh - you know that for a fact? Please let us all know how many years experience you have had with the Emergency Alert System. I've been doing this for over 15 years, and I can tell you for a fact that you don't have a single efffing clue what you are talking about.
Oh - you know that for a fact? Please let us all know how many years experience you have had with the Emergency Alert System. I've been doing this for over 15 years, and I can tell you for a fact that you don't have a single efffing clue what you are talking about. Of course, that is what happened or just something as similar accidentally mundane. You continue to work yourself into a frenzy about these insignificant things and try so hard to turn them into a huge conspiracy theory that whenever someone farts in your office you contemplate sending out an EAS message about a terrorist “radon gas” attack. You have been doing this for over 15 years and you boss still lets you work there? Damn, they must really be hard up to find efficiently qualified workers in Michigan. Anyway, I don’t care that you have been doing something for 15 years. That to me means that you may be half way to getting it right and in another 15 years, because of your retardation, you just finally start get it right. Some folks are slow learners….and you broke the mold.
Of course, that is what happened or just something as similar accidentally mundane. Good grief - how do you function with such severely limited intelligence?
Good grief - how do you function with such severely limited intelligence? Good grief, man, how can you have been working at a TV station for 15 years and not know that accidents happen….like this one: Accidents do happen....they are not all conspiracy theories or hackers at work
No one is claiming that accidents don't happen you ignorant assclown - the message “Civil Authorities have issues a Hazardous Materials Warning for The United States. Effective until September 29, 02:16AM EDT. Would you. Could you. On a Train? Wait for further instructions.” was NOT the result of an accident or a FUBAR. It was a deliberate HACK which the station has already admitted. There was no hacker involved in this accident either. Oh - I see the problem now. You don't understand the difference between an accident and the deliberate hacking of the system. More's the pity. I feel I have shamed and humiliated you enough The only thing you have done is display your breath-taking ignorance.
Bullshit. Someone in the system fucked up and the easy way out is to claim "We Waz Hacked." LOL ...
That only works for gay Alaskans and their mindless sycophants. We're done here ninnyhammer - it's obvious that you are ignorant beyond what words can describe. If anyone fucked up it was by not having proper password security which allowed the hacker to insert the cryptic message. The fact remains - the system was hacked. So bugger off you bloody lightweight. There are problems within the EAS system not caused by hacking. Of course there are - this was not one of them. Erroneous Suffolk evacuation order blamed on glitch For the love of God man! A "glitch" is not the same thing as a hack. Fucking retard! There are specific words and phrases that are sent as part of an EAS message - “Would You? Could You? On a Train?” is not one of them.
You are “specifically” correct. And while there are specific words and phrases that are sent as part of an EAS message – a commercial advertisement for ARCO/BP gasoline along with the words, "This test has been brought to you by ARCO" is not one of them either. Yet in both cases, those messages were clearly transmitted over EAS by glitches. http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi? ArtNum=48027&Disp=0
#37. To: Gatlin (#36)
The station AND FEMA both ADMITTED the system was hacked you ignorant SOB. FEMA is investigating it as a deliberate HACK. Fucking retarded idiot
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Without any particular explanation, an emergency broadcast warning went out over WKTV 2 in Utica, NY that read:
#2. To: Gatlin (#1)
#3. To: Deckard (#2)
That isn't a part of any EAS (Emergency Alert System) test I have ever seen.
#10. To: Gatlin (#3)
That isn't a part of any EAS (Emergency Alert System) test I have ever seen.
#13. To: Deckard (#10)
That isn't a part of any EAS (Emergency Alert System) test I have ever seen.
#16. To: Gatlin (#13)
It was someone just internally testing the system and putting in some random message for the test and accidentally hit the transmit switch.
#19. To: Deckard (#16)
It was someone just internally testing the system and putting in some random message for the test and accidentally hit the transmit switch.
#22. To: Gatlin (#19)
It was someone just internally testing the system and putting in some random message for the test and accidentally hit the transmit switch.
#23. To: Deckard (#22)
It was someone just internally testing the system and putting in some random message for the test and accidentally hit the transmit switch. Of course, that is what happened or just something as similar accidentally mundane.
On February 1, 2005, someone activated an EAS message over radio and television stations in Connecticut telling residents to evacuate the state immediately. Officials at the Office of Emergency Management announced that the activation and broadcast of the Emergency Alert System was in error due to possibly the wrong button being pressed. "State police said they received no calls related to the erroneous alert.
In the article you posted, the station that made the transmission said it was a accident....why do you find that so hard to believe?
#32. To: Gatlin (#23)
(Edited)
Good grief, man, how can you have been working at a TV station for 15 years and not know that accidents happen….like this one:
#33. To: Deckard (#32)
It was a deliberate HACK which the station has already admitted.
#35. To: Gatlin (#33)
(Edited)
Someone in the system fucked up and the easy way out is to claim "We Waz Hacked."
#36. To: Deckard (#35)
There are specific words and phrases that are sent as part of an EAS message - “Would You? Could You? On a Train?” is not one of them.
Replies to Comment # 36.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 36.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]