The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles
Title: How Trump Wins The Debate: All He Has To Do Is Beat The Point Spread
Source:
VDare
URL Source: http://www.vdare.com/articles/how-t ... to-do-is-beat-the-point-spread
Published: Sep 23, 2016
Author: Patrick J. Buchanan
Post Date: 2016-09-23 12:24:20 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 733
Comments: 4
In one of my first trips to New Hampshire in 1991, to challenge President George H. W. Bush, I ran into Sen. Eugene McCarthy. He was returning to the scene of his ’68 triumph, when he had inflicted the first crippling wound on Lyndon Johnson. “Pat, you don’t have to win up here, you know,” he assured me. “All you have to do is beat the point spread.” “Beat the point spread” is a good description of what Donald Trump has to do in Monday night’s debate. With only a year in national politics, he does not have to show a mastery of foreign and domestic policy details. Rather, he has to do what John F. Kennedy did in 1960, and what Ronald Reagan did in 1980. He has to meet and exceed expectations, which are not terribly high. He has to convince a plurality of voters, who seem prepared to vote for him, that he’s not a terrible risk, and that he will be a president of whom they can be proud. He has to show the country a Trump that contradicts the caricature created by those who dominate our politics, culture and press. The Trump on stage at Hofstra University will have 90 minutes to show that the malicious cartoon of Donald Trump is a libelous lie. He can do it, for he did it at the Mexico City press conference with President Pena Nieto where he surprised his allies and stunned his adversaries. Recall. Kennedy and Reagan, too, came into their debates with a crucial slice of the electorate undecided but ready to vote for them if each could relieve the voters’ anxieties about his being within reach of the button to launch a nuclear war. Kennedy won the first debate, not because he offered more convincing arguments or more details on the issues, but because he appeared more lucid, likable and charismatic, more mature than folks had thought. And he seemed to point to a brighter, more challenging future for which the country was prepared after Ike. After that first debate, Americans could see JFK sitting in the Oval Office. Reagan won his debate with Carter because his sunny disposition and demeanor and his “There you go again!” airy dismissal of Carter’s nit-picking contradicted the malevolent media-created caricatures of the Gipper as a dangerous primitive or an amiable dunce. Even George W. Bush, who, according to most judges, did not win a single debate against Al Gore or John Kerry, came off as a levelheaded fellow who was more relatable than the inventor of the internet or the windsurfer of Cape Cod. The winner of presidential debates is not the one who compiles the most debating points. It is the one whom the audience decides they like, and can be comfortable taking a chance on. Trump has the same imperative and same opportunity as JFK and Reagan. For the anticipated audience, of Super Bowl size, will be there to see him, not her. He is the challenger who fills up the sports arenas with the tens and scores of thousands, not Hillary Clinton. If she were debating John Kasich or Jeb Bush, neither the viewing audience nor the title-fight excitement of Monday night would be there. Specifically, what does Trump need to do? He needs to show that he can be presidential. He needs to speak with confidence, but not cockiness, and to deal with Clinton’s attacks directly, but with dignity and not disrespect. And humor always helps. Clinton has a more difficult assignment. America knows she knows the issues. But two-thirds of the country does not believe her to be honest or trustworthy. As her small crowds show, she sets no one on fire. Blacks, Hispanics and millennials who invested high hopes in Barack Obama seem to have no great hopes for her. She has no bold agenda, no New Deal or New Frontier. “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?” wailed Hillary Clinton this week. The answer is simple. America has seen enough of her and has no great desire to see any more; and she cannot change an impression hardened over 25 years— in 90 minutes. But the country will accept her, if the only alternative is the Trump of the mainstream media’s portrayal. Hence, the strategy of the Democratic Party for the next seven weeks is obvious: Trash Trump, take him down, make him intolerable, and we win. No matter how she performs though, Donald Trump can win the debate, for he is the one over whom the question marks hang. But he is also the one who can dissipate and destroy them with a presidential performance. In that sense, this debate and this election are Trump’s to win.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
(Edited)
I think all Trump needs to do to win the debate is to show up. Trump speaks very well, at least with a friendly interviewer. There are plenty of youtube vids of him presenting himself extremely well in such venues. He has great personality, charisma and presence when he does so, excepting only when stumbles with topic due to lack of preparation (as he's done) or with a hostile interviewer, which he'll certainly have at the debate. But he should be well practiced with topics in anticipation, and he's certainly more experienced by now with unfriendly interviewers. Hillary's challenge will be to avoid collapsing or having a seizure on stage due to her health issues, whatever they are, combined with the stress of potentially facing jail time or exile in South America if she doesn't win the election. Count on her being on some kind of drugs to keep her upright for those 90 mins. Her campaign has to be quite nervous about her physically collapsing on stage. I think her health issues would be less of a campaign issue in this age when disabled people are encouraged to go the distance, except that it would show that Hillary has been hiding her health issue from the American public. And if she's wearing an earpiece to get sound bites from someone off stage and gets caught with that, it's of course game over for her. But I agree with the author that all Trump has to do is sound, act and look presidential, and he'll win. That's not a given, but that's all he has to do. Edit: It shouldn't be hard to catch Hillary if she has an earpiece. The frequencies they use should be rather common. Anyone with a receiver nearby would just need to listen in on one of a variety of frequencies at the right time to catch her in the act.
She can afford security features like frequency shifting. Difficult to tune in when the frequency's changing. If Trump slips up and starts speaking Russian, we'll know that Putin is talking in his ear. She can afford security features like frequency shifting. Difficult to tune in when the frequency's changing. Something like that compressed into a tiny insertable earpiece would be state of the art.
She's certainly got the spook connections to get it.
#2. To: Pinguinite, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#1)
Anyone with a receiver nearby would just need to listen in on one of a variety of frequencies at the right time to catch her in the act.
Castle(C), Stein(G), Johnson(L)
#3. To: hondo68 (#2)
#4. To: Pinguinite (#3)
would be state of the art.
Castle(C), Stein(G), Johnson(L)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]