[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"

"They Gave Trump the Center, and He Took It"

French doors

America THEN and NOW in 65 FASCINATING Photos

"CNN pundit Scott Jennings goes absolutely nuclear on Biden’s ‘farce’ of a farewell speech — and he’s not alone"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Health/Medical
See other Health/Medical Articles

Title: A Doctor's Take on Pot
Source: Scientific American
URL Source: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com ... t-blog/a-doctor-s-take-on-pot/
Published: Aug 23, 2016
Author: Nathaniel P. Morris
Post Date: 2016-08-24 11:14:24 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 10127
Comments: 42

We rarely worry about marijuana. So why is it still a Schedule I drug?

On August 11th, the Drug Enforcement Administration announced its decision to keep marijuana classified as a Schedule I drug. The federal government has historically referred to this category as the “most dangerous” group of substances, including drugs like heroin and bath salts.

As a resident physician specializing in mental health, I can't make much sense of this.

Every day, I talk to patients about substance abuse. Whether evaluating patients in clinic, in the emergency department, or on inpatient units, my colleagues and I screen patients for substance use. It's a vital component of any clinical interview, particularly in mental health care, and helps us understand patients' habits and their risks for medical complications.

During my medical training, I've learned which substances to worry about, and which ones matter less.

Alcohol is usually the first substance I ask about. Many people have seen drinking go wrong, be it a friend making a bad decision or a family member struggling with alcoholism. But clinicians see the worst of this on the front lines.

Intoxicated patients stream into emergency departments after crashing their cars, inhaling their own vomit, or falling into a coma. According to the National Institutes of Health, alcohol-related conditions contributed to more than 1.2 million emergency department visits in 2010. The Centers for Disease Control reports excess alcohol consumption causes roughly 88,000 deaths in the US each year.

And alcohol can be just as frightening when patients stop drinking. Heavy drinkers who don't consume as much as they usually do can go into alcohol withdrawal, ranging from mild tremors to terrifying seizures and death. I've spent much of my residency training so far learning how to treat and recognize complications from alcohol withdrawal.

It's not only alcohol that clinicians worry about. Cocaine can cause heart attacks, kidney failure, and complications during pregnancy like placental abruption. Methamphetamine can trigger an assortment of responses, from hyperthermia to violent agitation to cardiogenic shock. Opioids like morphine can plunge patients into respiratory failure and kill them. Intravenous drug use puts patients at risk for hepatitis, endocarditis, or even brain abscesses.

But, for most health care providers, marijuana is an afterthought.

We don't see cannabis overdoses. We don't order scans for cannabis-related brain abscesses. We don't treat cannabis-induced heart attacks. In medicine, marijuana use is often seen on par with tobacco or caffeine consumption—something we counsel patients about stopping or limiting, but nothing urgent to treat or immediately life-threatening.

The federal government's scheduling of marijuana bears little relationship to actual patient care. The notion that marijuana is more dangerous or prone to abuse than alcohol (not scheduled), cocaine (Schedule II), methamphetamine (Schedule II), or prescription opioids (Schedules II, III, and IV) doesn't reflect what we see in clinical medicine.

This isn't to say marijuana is harmless.

Indeed research suggests it may have deleterious effects on the developing brains of adolescents. Marijuana use has been linked to psychotic symptoms in some individuals. Synthetic marijuana has emerged as a new public health challenge and, in 2012, Congress added many of these toxic compounds as separate entities under the Schedule I category.

According to NPR, Chuck Rosenberg, acting head of the DEA, explained the decision to keep marijuana as a Schedule I drug was based more “on whether marijuana, as determined by the FDA, is a safe and effective medicine."

Regulations have prevented US researchers from answering this question over the last several decades. As written in a recent New  York Times editorial, "the government itself has made it impossible to do the kinds of trials and studies that could produce the evidence that would justify changing the drug's classification."

Yet, according to a 2015 systematic review, studies from around the world suggest cannabis and cannabinoid therapies may help patients in a number of ways. These include treating chronic pain, muscle spasms, debilitating side effects of chemotherapy like nausea, and weight loss from HIV infection. Dozens of US states have listened to such findings in recent years and passed legislation approving the use of medical marijuana.

Despite keeping marijuana as a Schedule I substance, the Obama administration has promised to expand national research into the drug. This is a welcome change, and we'll hopefully develop deeper insights into the risks and the benefits of cannabis use.

In the meantime, our nation’s substance policies should be grounded in the realities of clinical practice.

In hospitals across the country, patients writhe in agony from alcohol withdrawal, turn violent from crystal meth, and struggle to breathe after overdosing on prescription opioids. These are the cases that keep health care providers on edge. These are the patients we follow closely. When our pagers go off, we hurry to the bedside, give medications, alert security or even begin resuscitation.

With marijuana? Not so much.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

"The federal government has historically referred to this category as the “most dangerous” group of substances, including drugs like heroin and bath salts."

Here we f**king go again. Set up that "dangerous" -- no, "most dangerous" -- strawman and knock him down!

misterwhite  posted on  2016-08-24   11:30:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: misterwhite (#1)

Here we f**king go again. Set up that "dangerous" -- no, "most dangerous" -- strawman and knock him down!

Back to that lie? "Schedule I drugs are considered the most dangerous class of drugs" - https://www.dea.gov/druginfo/ds.shtml

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-08-24   12:06:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: ConservingFreedom (#6)

"https://www.dea.gov/druginfo/ds.shtml"

Hmmmm. Nothing on your link about "most dangerous".

misterwhite  posted on  2016-08-24   16:47:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: misterwhite (#14)

Nothing on your link about "most dangerous".

Not any more - they pulled that text a few days ago: web.archive.org/web/20160...dea.gov/druginfo/ds.shtml

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-08-24   17:45:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: ConservingFreedom (#17)

"Not any more - they pulled that text a few days ago"

Probably because it was an outdated position they no longer have. NOW what are you going to do?

misterwhite  posted on  2016-08-24   19:20:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: misterwhite (#18)

Probably because it was an outdated position they no longer have.

If by that you mean they realized that continuing to claim that marijuana was one of the "most dangerous" drugs had become so laughable as to do them more harm than good.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-08-25   17:34:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: ConservingFreedom, misterwhite (#21)

If by that you mean they realized that continuing to claim that marijuana was one of the "most dangerous" drugs had become so laughable as to do them more harm than good.

It appears they became sensitive to the fact that their phrasing did not comport with the Schedule I definition at 84 Stat. 1247 (1970).

84 Stat. 1236, 1247 (1970). It is codified at 21 U.S.C. § 812 without textual change.

SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES

SEC. 202. (a) There are established five schedules of controlled substances, to be known as schedules I, II, III, IV, and V. Such schedules shall initially consist of the substances listed in this section. The schedules established by this section shall be updated and republished on a semiannual basis during the two-year period beginning one year after the date of enactment of this title and shall be updated and republished on an annual basis thereafter.

(b) Except where control is required by United States obligations under an international treaty, convention, or protocol, in effect on the effective date of this part, and except in the case of an immediate precursor, a drug or other substance may not be placed in any schedule unless the findings required for such schedule are made with respect to such drug or other substance. The findings required for each of the schedules are as follows:

(1) SCHEDULE I.—

(A) The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse.

(B) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.

(C) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.

nolu chan  posted on  2016-08-25   18:58:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: nolu chan (#22)

It appears they became sensitive to the fact that their phrasing did not comport with the Schedule I definition at 84 Stat. 1247 (1970).

Yes, "became sensitive" after at least 45 months of having that text on that page, just at the time when their decision to not reschedule was drawing attention to that page.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-08-25   19:14:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: ConservingFreedom (#23)

Like the commies of the past you want America drugged and stupid.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-08-25   19:41:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: A K A Stone (#24)

Like the commies of the past you want America drugged and stupid.

Was it commies who ended the Prohibition of the stupid-making drug alcohol?

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-08-25   20:21:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: ConservingFreedom (#25)

Your changing subject. The commies like you want America drugged and stupid so that we fall as a nation. Your position is immoral.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-08-25   20:25:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: A K A Stone (#26)

"Was it commies who ended the Prohibition of the stupid-making drug alcohol?"

Your changing subject.

Nope - the subject was drugs and their unbanning.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-08-25   20:27:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: ConservingFreedom, A K A Stone (#27)

Nope - the subject was drugs and their unbanning.

Marijuana has not passed the tests that every drug must pass. Anecdotal evidence from the illegal use of marijuana does not suffice.

For medical use, Medical marijuana requires that the product be of a known strength and purity.

Even grandpappy making perfectly good shine, if he wants to go legal and get licensed, probably would have to do some things that he does not do when making his shine.

And to get a schedule change, there nothing like reading who does it according to federal law.

The Attorney General requests from the Secretary (not DEA but DHHS) a scientific and medical evaluation, and recommendations. The Attorney General considers and acts upon schedule changes. DEA is an enforcement agency, not a medical or scientific department. It is part of the Department of Justice.

In the case of an applicable treaty, and there is one, removing a drug from the schedule would require a change in the treaty or federal law.

http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2014/title-21/chapter-13/subchapter-i/part-b/sec.-811/

(b) Evaluation of drugs and other substances

The Attorney General shall, before initiating proceedings under subsection (a) of this section to control a drug or other substance or to remove a drug or other substance entirely from the schedules, and after gathering the necessary data, request from the Secretary a scientific and medical evaluation, and his recommendations, as to whether such drug or other substance should be so controlled or removed as a controlled substance. In making such evaluation and recommendations, the Secretary shall consider the factors listed in paragraphs (2), (3), (6), (7), and (8) of subsection (c) of this section and any scientific or medical considerations involved in paragraphs (1), (4), and (5) of such subsection. The recommendations of the Secretary shall include recommendations with respect to the appropriate schedule, if any, under which such drug or other substance should be listed. The evaluation and the recommendations of the Secretary shall be made in writing and submitted to the Attorney General within a reasonable time. The recommendations of the Secretary to the Attorney General shall be binding on the Attorney General as to such scientific and medical matters, and if the Secretary recommends that a drug or other substance not be controlled, the Attorney General shall not control the drug or other substance. If the Attorney General determines that these facts and all other relevant data constitute substantial evidence of potential for abuse such as to warrant control or substantial evidence that the drug or other substance should be removed entirely from the schedules, he shall initiate proceedings for control or removal, as the case may be, under subsection (a) of this section.

(c) Factors determinative of control or removal from schedules

In making any finding under subsection (a) of this section or under subsection (b) of section 812 of this title, the Attorney General shall consider the following factors with respect to each drug or other substance proposed to be controlled or removed from the schedules:

(1) Its actual or relative potential for abuse.

(2) Scientific evidence of its pharmacological effect, if known.

(3) The state of current scientific knowledge regarding the drug or other substance.

(4) Its history and current pattern of abuse.

(5) The scope, duration, and significance of abuse.

(6) What, if any, risk there is to the public health.

(7) Its psychic or physiological dependence liability.

(8) Whether the substance is an immediate precursor of a substance already controlled under this subchapter.

(d) International treaties, conventions, and protocols requiring control; procedures respecting changes in drug schedules of Convention on Psychotropic Substances

(1) If control is required by United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on October 27, 1970, the Attorney General shall issue an order controlling such drug under the schedule he deems most appropriate to carry out such obligations, without regard to the findings required by subsection (a) of this section or section 812(b) of this title and without regard to the procedures prescribed by subsections (a) and (b) of this section.

[snip]

nolu chan  posted on  2016-08-26   0:01:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 30.

#31. To: nolu chan (#30)

Despite all the legalese you applaud, did you ever realize marijuana is a backyard weed?

Or are you really understanding and knowing the goddamned concept that: GOVERNMENT CAN NOT ENFORCE MARIJUANA LAWS?

buckeroo  posted on  2016-08-26 00:33:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com