Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: New revelations show a nation for sale under Hillary Clinton
Source:
NY Post
URL Source: http://nypost.com/2016/08/23/new-re ... or-sale-under-hillary-clinton/
Published: Aug 24, 2016
Author: David Harsanyl
Post Date: 2016-08-24 08:44:02 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 705
Comments: 7
Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton The Democratic Party often warns us that mixing big money and politics will corrupt democracy. They must have nominated Hillary Clinton to prove it. The Clinton Foundation was ostensibly set up to solve the world’s most pressing problems. Though it’s done some fine work, its most fruitful program has been leveraging Clinton’s position in the State Department to enrich her family, friends and cronies. It’s against federal law for charities to act in the interests of private business or individuals. Yet the Clinton Foundation secured high-paying gigs for its namesakes and helped for-profit corporations with family ties set up lucrative deals. As it turns out, that’s probably the least corrupt part of the story. It is becoming clear the foundation was a center of influence peddling. Rock stars. Soccer players. Conglomerates. Crown princes. All of them paid in. All of them expected access to the US government. Want a seat on a government intelligence advisory board even though you have no relevant experience? The Clinton Foundation may be able to help. Recently released emails prove the charity’s officials had sought access to State Department personnel while Hillary was in charge. Folks like the prince of Bahrain, who donated $32 million to the foundation, needed to get in touch. An Associated Press investigation finds that more than half the private citizens who met or spoke with Clinton while she was secretary of state also happened to donate to her foundation. What are the odds? The New York Post’s front cover for Aug. 24, 2016 It’s implausible that a majority of the 154 citizens — people who’d kicked in at least $156 million to her charity — would also happen to catch Clinton’s ear as she toiled away at State. It’s also worth remembering this list doesn’t even include officials from the 16 governments — many of them autocrats — who threw the foundation another $170 million. Recently, the foundation announced it would ban donations from corporations and foreign countries if Hillary is elected president. The question is: If it’s a conflict of interest when Hillary will be president, why wasn’t it a problem when she was secretary of state? Let’s also not forget that during Clinton’s tenure at State, she failed to disclose that regimes across the world were giving her charity hundreds of millions. Because she needed to hide this, she ended up sending 110 emails containing classified information — eight of which had “top secret” information, according to the FBI. These days, Hillary brazenly goes on Jimmy Kimmel to clown around about her “boring” emails. Well, if they’re so irrelevant, why was she hiding them from the Justice Department? If it’s no big deal, why did it take four years and a lawsuit against the State Department to gain access to her planning schedules? Why did she lie to the American people? Erase tens of thousands of emails? Set up a private server in the first place? Hillary claims running the State Department gave her the experience and temperament necessary to be president. But if anything, it reminds us of the Clintons’ propensity for scandal and dishonesty. And if Clinton wins this year, she’ll become the most ethically compromised president in contemporary times. Perhaps ever. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Best NY Post cover, ever.
Im surprised the unions have not shut down the NYpost. They have been one of the few news outlets that actually attack Clinton's.
Occasionally, they have. And occasionally, they have praised Trump. But overall, they're in the bag for Clinton, imo. At least, so far.
No other MSM will say a bad thing(the Truth) about Clinton and go out of their way to bash those that say the truth. They were even going after wikileaks and group for posting Clinton's "lost" emails.
Thank the clinton crime machine and those thousands of fbi files craig livingstone delivered to it. Truly, a gift that keeps on giving.
Trump will continue to offer Hillary large sums of money, and she will continue to take it. It's The Art of the Deal. It's not in hildebeest's dna to turn down payola. How much has trump given her? And in exchange for what?
#2. To: cranky (#1)
#3. To: Justified (#2)
They have been one of the few news outlets that actually attack Clinton's.
#4. To: cranky (#3)
#5. To: Justified (#4)
No other MSM will say a bad thing(the Truth) about Clinton and go out of their way to bash those that say the truth.
#6. To: cranky, Trump an eager buyer, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#0)
Castle(C), Stein(G), Johnson(L)
#7. To: hondo68 (#6)
Trump will continue to offer Hillary large sums of money, and she will continue to take it.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]