[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: US Marine and Navy Vet Sends HARDCORE Letter To Muslim Father Who Slammed Trump
Source: thefederalistpapers.org
URL Source: http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/ ... uslim-father-who-slammed-trump
Published: Aug 3, 2016
Author: C.E. Dyer
Post Date: 2016-08-03 03:48:37 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 568
Comments: 3

Khizr Khan, the father of Captain Humayun Khan who was killed in Iraq in 2004, gave a speech at the Democrat National Convention last week where he slammed GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump. In response, U.S. Marine and Navy veteran Chris Mark wrote an incredible letter that dismantled Khan’s charge that Trump has “sacrificed nothing and no one,” among other brilliant points.

The letter is included below in it’s entirety and it is, undoubtedly, a must read:

“Dear Mr. Khan,

I want to preface this letter by stating that I respect your son’s sacrifice for this great nation. By all accounts, he is a true hero that sacrificed himself in service to our country. For that I am thankful. As a veteran, I watched your comments at the Democratic National Convention with a mixture of sadness, and anger. The United States has a military comprised of volunteers. Every single member has made the conscious choice to join the military and serve. There is not a single service member who has been forced into service. It is important for all service members (and apparently, their families) to understand that service to this great nation does not imbue one with special privileges or rights. I found your comments troubling when you said: “Have you ever been to Arlington cemetery? Go look at the graves of brave patriots who died defending the United States of America. You will see all faiths, genders and ethnicities. You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”

Does it matter whether Mr. Trump has sacrificed “…nothing and no one?”…has Ms. Clinton “..sacrificed” for this nation? How about Mr. Obama? Your comment stating that Mr. Trump “…has sacrifice no one” is alarming. Are you intimating that YOU sacrificed? Sir, your son willingly sacrificed himself. As a father I cannot imagine the pain you must feel but his sacrifice is his own. He was not forced to serve.

I am troubled that you would allow a party that has little more than contempt for the US Service Member to parade you into the DNC to denounce Donald Trump. Did you watch when protesters at the DNC booed and heckled Medal of Honor recipient Capt. Florent Groberg? Did you notice your party interrupting the moment of silence for slain police officers? Your own hypocrisy in not denouncing these acts and instead using the DNC as a platform to make a political point is disgraceful. The simple fact is that whether one served or sacrificed does not give greater power to their statements. One vote is as valuable as another. That sir, is why our Country is great. Your condemnation of one person for a statement while standing idly as your party disparages veterans and police officers is the height of hypocrisy.

To conflate the need to prevent potential terrorists from entering our country with the belief that ‘all Muslims’ should be banned is simply wrong and disingenuous. As a reminder, Mr. Trump said: ” “Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life,” The irony of your son’s own death at the hands of these very people in Iraq should not be ignored. I have little doubt that your son would have recognized the need to protect our country from these very people. In fact, he held is own troops back so that he could check on a suspicious car. Your son understood sacrifice and how to protect “his people”…’his soldiers’….’his fellow Americans’…

As you continue to make the media circuit and bask in the glow of affection cast upon you by a party that has little regard for your son’s own sacrifice, and veterans in general, I would ask you to consider your comments and your position more closely.

Respectfully,
Chris Mark
US Marine and Navy Veteran.”

Mark’s crucial point that Trump’s position on protecting our country from terrorism cannot be stressed enough. The left has attempted to twist it, but Trump’s common sense position on terror is rooted in a simple idea: keep Americans safe.

As Mark said, “Your son understood sacrifice and how to protect “his people…his soldiers…his fellow Americans…”; while adding that Khan’s son died at the hands of jihadis — the very people Trump’s common-sense policies are designed to protect Americans from.

Khan held up his copy of the Constitution and urged Trump to read it. Perhaps Khan himself should take a moment to read and understand the Constitution his heroic son fought and died to protect. Khan would quickly find that Trump’s positions are well within the bounds of the Constitution. He would also find that, contrary to his erroneous statement, Trump’s measures would keep Americans at home safe without sacrificing “liberty” or “equal protection of law.”

Mark’s letter was an eloquent rebuttal to Khan. Hopefully Khan will take a moment to read it and really think about what his son’s heroic sacrifice stood for.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Gatlin (#0) (Edited)

Trump’s common sense position on terror is rooted in a simple idea: keep Americans safe

DNC
... jihad

DNC
shariah
... waffen
SS *
storm
troopers

DNC
shangri
... lala
land

Make
America
normal
great
again

love
boris


* Schutz•staf•fel

(ȃŠts̃tQ fYl)

n.

German.

an elite military unit of the Nazi Party that served as Hitler's bodyguard and as a special police force.

Abbr.: SS

[literally, defense echelon]

Random House Kernerman

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Schutzstaffel

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2016-08-03   7:11:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Gatlin (#0)

" Mark’s letter was an eloquent rebuttal to Khan. Hopefully Khan will take a moment to read it and really think about what his son’s heroic sacrifice stood for. "

Yes, a most excellent letter. I would hope that Mr. Khan would wake up and realize that the Demonrat party has used him as a useful idiot.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't

Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.

if you look around, we have gone so far down the the rat hole, the almighty is going to have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah, if we don't have a judgement come down on us.

President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood

"I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur

Stoner  posted on  2016-08-03   7:39:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Gatlin (#0)

Khan held up his copy of the Constitution and urged Trump to read it. Perhaps Khan himself should take a moment to read and understand the Constitution

Khan was deliberately wrong when slinging immigration accusations at Trump, and waving his copy of the Constitution, and he cannot be given the benefit of any doubt about knowing the actual law. Khan is an attorney whose lawfirm website claimed he worked in the immigration field.

Lawfirm Homepage and International Business page as captured at Wayback.

Khan's firm worked on EB5 visas.

Wikipedia states:

The EB-5 visa provides a method of obtaining a green card for foreign nationals who invest money in the United States. To obtain the visa, individuals must invest $1,000,000 (or at least $500,000 in a Targeted Employment Area - high unemployment or rural area), creating or preserving at least 10 jobs for U.S. workers excluding the investor and their immediate family. Initially, under the first EB-5 program, the foreign investor was required to create an entirely new commercial enterprise; however, under the Pilot Program investments can be made directly in a job-generating commercial enterprise (new, or existing - "Troubled Business"), or into a "Regional Center" - a 3rd party-managed investment vehicle (private or public), which assumes the responsibility of creating the requisite jobs. Regional Centers may charge an administration fee for managing the investor's investment.

If the foreign national investor's petition is approved, the investor and their dependents will be granted conditional permanent residence valid for two years. Within the 90 day period before the conditional permanent residence expires, the investor must submit evidence documenting that the full required investment has been made and that 10 jobs have been maintained, or 10 jobs have been created or will be created within a reasonable time period.

As for his claim that his son would not have been in the country, while waiving a copy of the Constitution, and asking if Trump had ever read it, I heard Rush Limbaugh today assert that it was Khan who did not read it. But as in immigration lawyer, Khan certainly read the Constitution and immigration law.

Immigration law is clear. The President may exclude any class of aliens by proclamation.

http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2013/title-8/chapter-12/subchapter-ii/part-ii/section-1182/

Inadmissible aliens - 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (2013)

8 U.S.C. § 1182(f) (2013)

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.

The Religious Test clause (Article 6, Clause 3) has nothing whatever to do with immigration. It is explicitly confined to qualifications to any office or public trust.

no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Some writings by Khan.

https://www.scribd.com/document/320016152/Khizr-Khan-Juristic-Classification-Islamic-Law

JURISTIC CLASSIFICATION OF ISLAMIC LAW

Khizr Muazzam Khan

https://www.scribd.com/document/320016178/Khizr-Khan-Human-Rights-Islam

BOOK REVIEW

HUMAN RIGHTS IN ISLAM. By the International Commission of Jurists. Geneva, Switzerland: International Commission of Jurists 1982.

Review by Khizr Khan

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/01/just-joking-media-apoplectic-khizr-khan-attack-donald-trump-goes-flames/

Khizr Khan has all sorts of financial, legal, and political connections to the Clintons through his old law firm, the mega-D.C. firm Hogan Lovells LLP. That firm did Hillary Clinton’s taxes for years, starting when Khan still worked there involved in, according to his own website, matters “firm wide”—back in 2004. It also has represented, for years, the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States. Saudi Arabia, of course, is a Clinton Foundation donor which—along with the mega-bundlers of thousands upon thousands in political donations to both of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2016—plays right into the “Clinton Cash” narrative.

If Khan's Constitution-waving legal claims were known by him to have no legal basis, it is difficult to see him as doing anything but shilling for Hillary and the Democratic Party.

nolu chan  posted on  2016-08-03   16:26:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com