[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Refusing a search is a right, not a provocation (This is just incredible)
Source: Blacklisted News/Washington Post
URL Source: http://www.blacklistednews.com/Refu ... ocation/52820/0/38/38/Y/M.html
Published: Jul 19, 2016
Author: Radley Balko
Post Date: 2016-07-20 10:26:24 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 610
Comments: 8

[Waterbury Conn.] Police Chief Vernon L. Riddick Jr. brought a message of cooperation with police to a mostly African-American crowd of more than 200 people at Mount Olive A.M.E. Zion Church on Wednesday night.

If an officer stops your car, if they ask to search your person or vehicle, if they demand entry into your home, comply and then complain later to the department’s internal affairs office and police chief’s office if you feel your rights have been violated, Riddick said.

I understand the argument that you shouldn’t mouth off to cops. I get the argument that you shouldn’t needlessly provoke them. I certainly agree that you shouldn’t physically resist them. It could get you killed.

But this is a police chief who, in a town hall meeting spurred by a rash of shootings both by and of police officers, is asking that citizens submit without question if an officer requests to search a vehicle, home or person. In the interest of “cooperation,” he’s asking a black audience to give up their Fourth Amendment rights.

We empower the police to protect our rights. Much of the time, that involves protecting us from others who would do us harm. But it also means respecting our rights and refraining from violating them. The Fourth Amendment gives us the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The intent behind the amendment was to protect us from the indignity and violation of our privacy when we’re subjected to a search that’s based on little more than a hunch — the intent was not to protect our right to later complain to internal affairs.

I realize things are tense right now. We should certainly respect and be aware of that when interacting with law enforcement officers. But to verbally refuse a request to search is an exercise of one’s rights. It isn’t a provocation. That Riddick and other police officials seem to see it as the latter is telling — and a big problem.

*****

Poster comment : He's not just asking blacks to give up their rights - look at the crowd.

Alternate text if image doesn't load(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

There is no doubt that you do not allow police to search your vehicle or your home without a warrant. I don't even understand the part where I am watching cops, and they stop someone for what they deem "suspicious activity" and begin by patting down a driver, and end with searching the car. This does not sit well with me. What right do they have to search the driver of a car that they pull over for say expired tabs, or failure to use a turn signal?

Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.

jeremiad  posted on  2016-07-20   10:32:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0)

If an officer stops your car, if they ask to search your person or vehicle, if they demand entry into your home, comply and then complain later to the department’s internal affairs office and police chief’s office if you feel your rights have been violated

If you comply, then you can't complain later that your rights have been violated, because you complied.

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-07-20   10:37:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#0)

If an officer stops your car, if they ask to search your person or vehicle, if they demand entry into your home, comply and then complain later to the department’s internal affairs office and police chief’s office if you feel your rights have been violated, Riddick said.

If asked you deny them permission.(and best to record the conversation)

If they still force their way in not a good idea to try to physically stop them, unless you want to die or be hurt badly.

Over at FR are always nutbags who will post that they would stop police.

TrappedInMd  posted on  2016-07-20   11:00:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: jeremiad (#1)

"What right do they have to search the driver of a car that they pull over for say expired tabs, or failure to use a turn signal?"

Search or pat down?

"Once a law enforcement officer has lawfully stopped a person, the officer may conduct a patdown for firearms or other dangerous weapons when the officer reasonably suspects that his or her personal safety requires it. Consent is not a necessary prerequisite to an officer-safety patdown for weapons."

misterwhite  posted on  2016-07-20   12:04:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite (#4)

Right, looking for weapons when they come upon a small baggie with a gram of MJ. If police are allowed a "pat down" of everyone they stop, it gives them carte blanche to search everyone.

Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.

jeremiad  posted on  2016-07-21   1:44:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: jeremiad (#5)

"If police are allowed a "pat down" of everyone they stop, it gives them carte blanche to search everyone."

Set up that straw man and knock him down. I never said "everyone".

The courts have ruled that the officer may conduct a patdown for firearms or other dangerous weapons when the officer reasonably suspects that his or her personal safety requires it.

You're saying that shouldn't be allowed?

misterwhite  posted on  2016-07-21   9:07:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#6)

Define reasonable. To me it would mean a history of arrests, a gun or knife shaped bulge in clothing, or drug products in direct line of sight. The arrest history would be available to the police as soon as they entered license plate information, it would be totally filled in as they enter the drivers license info into the computer. Many times I see people pulled over for trivial things, end up being spread eagle on the hood of the car. It is not good public relations for policing, and is usually someone with a suspended sentence for not paying mandatory insurance times a few times.

Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.

jeremiad  posted on  2016-07-21   11:11:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: jeremiad (#7)

"Define reasonable."

That's up to the jury.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-07-21   11:16:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com