[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: It’s Our “Freedom” They Hate — US Coalition Air Strikes Kill 77 Civilians, Including Children On Monday, airstrikes, believed to be led by US coalition forces, killed 21 innocent civilians in Manbijs northern Hazawneh quarter in Syria, according to the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. On Tuesday, additional strikes in the region killed 56 more, including multiple children, according to Reuters. Prior to the strikes on Tuesday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights noted that more than 100 civilians have been killed in Manbij in only a short time nearly half of them children. The deaths of these innocent men, women, and children will, and likely already have been, written off as collateral damage in the war on terror. The US military will claim that Islamic militants hide among the population to deliberately cause civilian casualties during coalition strikes. However, they conveniently ignore the fact that it is coalition bombs killing the civilians. Prior to the assault on Syria from the west, Syria had vibrant, bustling marketplaces in the old cities of Damascus and Aleppo. The country boasted its own innovative IT industry despite economic sanctions imposed by the west. Terror attacks were all but non-existent and the people certainly never feared bombs falling from the sky. However, all that changed after the ambitions of the military industrial complex became reality. In depressing irony, the west continues to fail to realize the cause of terrorism. Americans, especially, continue to buy into the notion that the terrorists hate our freedom. The mainstream media and politicians alike fail to ever mention blowback as the real cause of terrorism. As Americans cower in fear over the perceived threat from men, women, and children attempting to escape ISIS from war-torn Syria, the majority of people are ignoring the reason there are refugees in the first place. The US created and funded the terrorist regime in Syria that would be used to destabilize the region and create a specific advantage for American interests over China and Russia. Prior to 2012, ISIS, as we know them, did not exist. So how did this unknown group of psychopathic killers gain such notoriety so quickly? Leaked Pentagon documents and News Anchor Ben Swann from WGCL Atlanta, explain exactly what happened. A plan to create and arm an active resistance to the Assad regime was put in place four years ago, and the result was a radical group of jihadists who, in turn, morphed into ISIS, all thanks to the United States. These leaked Pentagon documents are not the only evidence that the United States created and aided ISIS either. Just last year, renowned journalist Seymor Hersh interviewed members of the DoD who confirmed the establishment knew about the monster they were creating but chose to conveniently ignore it. According to the report: Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, director of the DIA between 2012 and 2014, confirmed that his agency had sent a constant stream of classified warnings to the civilian leadership about the dire consequences of toppling Assad. The jihadists, he said, were in control of the opposition. Turkey wasnt doing enough to stop the smuggling of foreign fighters and weapons across the border. If the American public saw the intelligence we were producing daily, at the most sensitive level, they would go ballistic, Flynn told me. We understood Isiss long-term strategy and its campaign plans, and we also discussed the fact that Turkey was looking the other way when it came to the growth of the Islamic State inside Syria. The DIAs reporting, he said, got enormous pushback from the Obama administration. I felt that they did not want to hear the truth. But thats not all. When Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter testified in a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee in December concerning the U.S. strategy for fighting ISIL, his inept attempt to keep knowledge of the ISIS oil convoy under wraps backfired in a most comical way. John McCain addressed the Defense Secretary in a state of facetious disbelief about the US-allowed and Turkish-protected oil routes from which ISIS earned a large portion of their funding: Secretary, you may want to correct the record. We all knew those fuel trucks were moving back and forth. Weve seen them. We knew it. The decision was not made by the White House to attack them. I think you may want to correct the record, he added, because I certainly knew. But it doesnt end there either. The US foreign policy of destabilizing the Middle Eastern region over past decades has led to resentment and hate toward the West. Subsequently, ISIS has no problem filling its ranks with the family members of the victims of the Wests brutal oppression in the region. As we reported last year, the United States foreign policy of drone warfare, killing thousands of children, has created a million Osama bin Ladens. Former Marine Vincent Emanueles acknowledgment of responsibility comes in an article that was posted on TeleSURs English website, in which he hoped to answer the often raised question of Where did ISIS come from? Only through educating ourselves and others about who is behind this theater of constant war and terror, will we ever begin to stop it. Continued dehumanization of Middle Eastern people and more war will only serve to fuel the flames of terrorism. Its high time American citizens stand up and bravely say no more war. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
There are no innocent muslims. They are all guilty.
Simpleton. You do realize that the U.S. created ISIS, right? Why is ISIS killing tens of times more muslims than westerners? Answer that. I'll just write you in as another "bomb the shit out of them" war mongering idiot. So ... maybe not? Maybe it Russian led forces? They don't know. How about a headline, "Someone Dropped Bombs" or "Maybe It Was Artillery". "Or Mortars".
The less muslims the better the planet is. How could we get a world with zero muslims? That would be paeadise on earth.
What is difference between you and them? That you are more bloodthirsty?
I work with two muslims. You're xenophobic. On Monday, airstrikes, believed to be led by US coalition forces... They don't know? Which nation's aircraft were used? Saudi? Jordanian? US? The US military will claim that Islamic militants hide among the population to deliberately cause civilian casualties during coalition strikes. Not a claim but a fact. I know so. However, they conveniently ignore the fact that it is coalition bombs killing the civilians. How does the author know this? Here's a fact. No dual use facility (that means even something that could contain civilians and military) will be bombed, according to LOAC and ROE, without ascertaining the civilian pattern of life. By the current basic ROE from this administration, in order to strike such a target with known civilians would require POTUS approval. Now the article said "coalition forces." Saudi Arabia and Jordan do not operate under our ROE but are signatories to the Geneva protocols (LOAC). I consider this article pure eisegesis.
So ... maybe not? Maybe it Russian led forces? They don't know. How about a headline, "Someone Dropped Bombs" or "Maybe It Was Artillery". "Or Mortars". Have you not learned never let facts or the lack there of, get in the way of spreading propaganda?
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|