LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: 11 Dallas Officers Shot, 3 Dead in Shooting as Protest Ended
Source:
NBC News
URL Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news ... police-shootings-black-n605686
Published: Jul 8, 2016
Author: Phil Helsel
Post Date: 2016-07-08 00:22:19 by Roscoe
Keywords: None
Views: 18243
Comments: 155
Eleven Dallas law enforcement officers were shot, three fatally, by what is believed to be two snipers who opened fire during a demonstration downtown over recent police shootings in Minnesota and Louisiana, the Dallas police chief said. The snipers fired from an elevated positions on police officers minutes before 9 p.m., Dallas Police Chief David Brown told reporters. "We believe that these suspects were positioning themselves in a way to triangulate on these officers from two different perches in garages in the downtown area, and planned to injure and kill as many law enforcement officers as they could," he said. Some were shot in the back. Three of the 11 officers died, two are in surgery and three are in critical condition, Brown said.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 140.
#16. To: Roscoe (#0)
This is what happens when you let shit run the country! This is what happens when you have an distorted apologist for a president! Innocent people die because we have a shit president ruining this country from head to toe!
Obungholes terms are the bloodiest of any prez. The great divider. I'll bet that after info gets released, the shooters will be Decktard thinking domestic terrorist. Weak minds that have been subjected to Paultard fear mongering for too long. Time will tell... Texas has its share of the Bob Molests 3% hero's.
It's going to be New Black Panthers, Black Liberation Army or a splinter from either one. The cameras should be in front of Louis Farrahkan today. He foments this crap often.
Really? And what about shining the light on those cops who shot that lady's fiance in Minnesota several days ago see here: and not also to exclude the fact about those recent shootings in Baton-Rouge, Lousiana.
Yeah, that something that is missing is the officer's camera that should have been recording the event at traffic stop. Unfortunately, in Minnesota police don't wear body cameras.
No, that's not what the article said about the drug-dealing armed robber.
I read the article you posted. But the point in mine posting that video was to inquire several things: 1) Everybody commenting on that video from that site, seems to want to discredit the woman. But my question is, where is that officer's body camera to dispute what she recorded? (2) The cop pulled the couple over for one thing which was a broken tail light. So why did the officer use such brazen moves to get her fiance to turn over his id? It's insane just watching what that officer did.
I read somewhere that Wisconsin police don't have body cams. At least not yet. In comparison with the woman who in initially very stoic, the cop seems to be in a state of hysteria.
That may be true, but this took place in Minnesota. Speaking of cameras, do you find it odd that she started recording after the shots? Could it be there's more video before the shots which would negate her story and justify the shooting?
Then I'll amend to say the state where the incident took place does not have body cams for police. No, it is not "odd" at all. Until shots were fired, there would have been minimal reason to record anything. The possibilities are endless, aren't they? Except that if the guy wanted to do a shootout with the cop who stopped him for a broken tail light with his 4 year old in the back seat, and his girlfriend in the passenger seat, he'd need a pretty good motive.
From what I've read elsewhere, I'm not sure it's his 4-year-old or his girlfriend. Be that as it may, certainly if she started recording as soon as they were pulled over -- and if her story was true -- it would be damning evidence against the police version of events, right? What possible good is a video after the shots were fired?
Your powers of deduction are incredible. Well it does show the cop in a state of hysteria, screaming and such, while she remained respectful and calm. It also shows the cop not seeking to administer first aid to try to save the guy, and not immediately calling for an ambulance. All in all, the cop seems very...... paranoid.
It's not paranoia if they're really after you. If you're any example, this cop will be lucky if he keeps his job. His "side bitch" is calm because she knows she'll continue to get her welfare, housing and food stamps.
Oh, he'll probably not be criminally penalized or fired, because there are no body cams or audio recordings to back up the woman's claim of events. He will be taken at his word that he told the guy not to reach for his license while her contradictory testimony will not be considered reliable. AS for paranoia, it is a feeling of fear that others want to harm you, regardless of whether it is true or not. One can be justly paranoid. It's another word for you to learn about, after "mock".
Whoa! Who said the cop asked for his license? Yeah. The girl. Who said he told the cop he had a concealed carry license. Again. The girl. Who said they were pulled over for a busted taillight? The girl. That's a lie and I suspect the other statements are also.
I wonder if Pinguinite was an OJ juror?
Oh yes, I was.
Right on!
#151. To: Roscoe (#140)
Poster boy for the black, unbiased juror.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#17. To: Justified (#16)
#62. To: GrandIsland (#17)
#86. To: redleghunter (#62)
(Edited)
The cameras should be in front of Louis Farrahkan today. He foments this crap often.
#90. To: goldilucky (#86)
exclude the fact about those recent shootings in Baton-Rouge, Lousiana.
#92. To: Roscoe (#90)
Upon further evaluation something is missing. We believe we have identified a very important missing element.
#94. To: goldilucky (#92)
Yeah, that something that is missing is the officer's camera
#114. To: Roscoe (#94)
#115. To: goldilucky (#114)
But my question is, where is that officer's body camera to dispute what she recorded? (2) The cop pulled the couple over for one thing which was a broken tail light. So why did the officer use such brazen moves to get her fiance to turn over his id? It's insane just watching what that officer did.
#117. To: Pinguinite (#115)
"I read somewhere that Wisconsin police don't have body cams. At least not yet."
#120. To: misterwhite (#117)
That may be true, but this took place in Minnesota.
Speaking of cameras, do you find it odd that she started recording after the shots?
Could it be there's more video before the shots which would negate her story and justify the shooting?
#121. To: Pinguinite (#120)
"with his 4 year old in the back seat, and his girlfriend in the passenger seat"
#122. To: misterwhite (#121)
certainly if she started recording as soon as they were pulled over -- and if her story was true -- it would be damning evidence against the police version of events, right?
What possible good is a video after the shots were fired?
#123. To: Pinguinite (#122)
"All in all, the cop seems very...... paranoid."
#124. To: misterwhite (#123)
It's not paranoia if they're really after you. If you're any example, this cop will be lucky if he keeps his job.
#132. To: Pinguinite, Roscoe (#124)
"He will be taken at his word that he told the guy not to reach for his license"
#136. To: misterwhite (#132)
That's a lie and I suspect the other statements are also.
#139. To: Roscoe (#136)
I wonder if Pinguinite was an OJ juror?
#140. To: Pinguinite (#139)
Replies to Comment # 140.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 140.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]