[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Remember when Rand Paul was the only person in Washington who opposed James Comey?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://rare.us/story/remember-when- ... ngton-who-opposed-james-comey/
Published: Jul 6, 2016
Author: Jack Hunter
Post Date: 2016-07-06 12:59:00 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 458
Comments: 3

When FBI Director James Comey announced Tuesday that Hillary Clinton wouldn’t be charged for sharing classified emails on her private server, many wondered if she was getting preferential treatment from the FBI. Some raised questions about Comey’s interpretation or perhaps even evasion of the law.

This wasn’t the first time his legal judgment has been questioned.

In 2013, Senator Rand Paul single-handedly held up Comey’s entire confirmation process, demanding the FBI answer a question about drones and warrantless surveillance.

Paul wanted to know if the government had used drone to surveil citizens without a warrant. The senator would not let Comey’s confirmation proceed until the FBI answered his questions.

The FBI responded that it had carried out exactly ten of the types of surveillance missions Paul was concerned about, explaining that in their view, the Fourth Amendment did not apply in those missions’ circumstances.

“I disagree with this interpretation,” Paul said. “However, given the fact that they did respond to my concerns over drone use on U.S. soil, I have decided to release my hold on the pending FBI director nominee.”

Vice’s Grace Wyler wondered about the questions Paul had raised in a story titled “What the FBI’s Letter to Rand Paul Says About the Bureau’s Domestic Drone Use”:

Like most explanations of the government’s drone policies, the letter raises more questions than it answers, namely: How many times did the FBI fly drones in each of these cases? For how long? What information was gathered from these drone flights? What kind of drones did its agents use, with what kind of cameras? And why were drones, rather than regular old manned aircraft, used in these cases?

[…]

Presumably, some of these questions are answered in the classified addendum provided to Sen. Paul. But for now, the public still knows relatively little about how, why or when the FBI uses drones.

“One thing we do know, however, is that the FBI doesn’t need a warrant to use drones for domestic surveillance,” Wyler also noted.

Related: The FBI’s refusal to prosecute Hillary Clinton is a travesty of justice

Some wondered if the senator famous for filibustering over civil liberties would filibuster Comey too. He didn’t.

The U.S. Senate voted to confirm Comey as FBI director on July 29, 2013. The vote was 93-1.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

At first I was upset at Comey, especially since he is a Republican. But after lengthy consideration, I think he knew exactly what he was doing all the time and handled this the best way.

If he had recommend an indictment, she would have been pulled and Biden would have run. I don’t think Trump could have beaten Biden. Biden would have been a less flawed candidate and with the majority of voters going with the Democrats in the past, then he would have won.

Again, I see Comey as “knowing exactly what he was doing and for a reason.” He laid the case out so specifically, point by point. Then I see him as “thinking”….I am giving you anti-clintonistas all the ammunition you need and it is more than enough. Now, Donald and you Pubs, take it and use it. Have at her …

Comey did not take questions, which he normally does. He has been invited to the House tomorrow to answer questions. He immediately responded that he would be there. So, instead of answering questions to a few reports and that being shown on TV….he will now have a much better platform to “lay it all out again.”

Comey will take a beating for what he did, but I do believe what he did was to Trump’s advantage and Hillary’s extreme disadvantage.

At this time, I go with Newt as second on the ticket. I think that would be one ass kicking combo.

Just my thoughts….what do you think?

Gatlin  posted on  2016-07-06   15:58:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Gatlin (#1)

Just my thoughts….what do you think?

I think you believe the FBI should base its decisions on how they'll benefit one politician over another, rather than enforce the law after enumerating dozens of felonies committed by the old hag, and that you're happy they chose to support YOUR politician.

Hank Rearden  posted on  2016-07-07   17:28:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Gatlin, and all his canary dupes, -- Y'ALL (#1)

At first I was upset at Comey, especially since he is a Republican. But after lengthy consideration, I think he knew exactly what he was doing all the time and handled this the best way. ---- If he had recommend an indictment, she would have been pulled and Biden would have run. I don’t think Trump could have beaten Biden. Biden would have been a less flawed candidate and with the majority of voters going with the Democrats in the past, then he would have won.

It's very amusing that you imagine Biden would beat Trump. -- Hillary has millions of near fanatical followers, -- Biden does not, as he can barely inspire even Bernies buffoons.

Again, I see Comey as “knowing exactly what he was doing and for a reason.” He laid the case out so specifically, point by point. Then I see him as “thinking”….I am giving you anti- clintonistas all the ammunition you need and it is more than enough. Now, Donald and you Pubs, take it and use it. Have at her … --- Comey did not take questions, which he normally does. He has been invited to the House tomorrow to answer questions. He immediately responded that he would be there. So, instead of answering questions to a few reports and that being shown on TV….he will now have a much better platform to “lay it all out again.”

And all he did was repeat his ludicrous concept that while he could recommend NO prosecution, he could not recommend ANY OTHER resolutions.

Comey will take a beating for what he did, but I do believe what he did was to Trump’s advantage and Hillary’s extreme disadvantage.

Comey gave Hillary and the administration the perfect excuse to attempt to sweep this under a rug. -- He, and they, and dupes like you will fail.

Just my thoughts….what do you think?

I think you're one of the neo-conservative clowns that will do damn near anything to 'get along'. Thinking like yours has lead us down the road to socialism.

tpaine  posted on  2016-07-07   18:23:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com