[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Judge Gets Journalist Indicted For Literally Doing His Job and Seeking Public Records What is going on in a small rural Georgia town is almost so crazy, its unbelievable. In fact, I probably wouldnt believe it was true except for the fact I spent three and half years reporting in Georgia and know some of the players involved from my days investigating local issues there. Here are the basics. Local reporter Mark Thomason, publisher of the Fannin Focus, and his newspapers attorney were jailed on felony charges after they tried to obtain records about the North Georgia court. Im not kidding, thats pretty much all they did. Chief Judge Brenda Weaver was so incensed by Thomasons relentless pursuit of public records she took matters into her own hands and called up the local district attorney, who sought the indictment, according to The Atlanta Journal Constitution. Now Thomason, and the newspapers attorney, Russell Stookey, are out on bail and may even be forced to undergo drug tests as one of the conditions. Worse yet, Judge Weaver, who recommended the charges to the DA, chairs the state Judicial Qualifications Commission which is the very body that is supposed to investigate judges for judicial misconduct! What a mess. Thomason and Stookey were charged with felonies including identity fraud, making a false statement and attempted identity fraud. The AJC did an excellent job of summarizing what got the judge so mad that she went after these ridiculous charges: Thomason was trying to find records that might support rumors that some court funds were misspent. His open records request sought copies of checks that have not been deposited but cashed illegally. The legal saga is rooted in a fight Thomason was having with a local court reporter. He had filed suit to obtain audio tapes of a court proceeding tapes he thought would reveal information that was not in the court reporters transcript. The stenographer filed a counterclaim, saying Thomason had defamed her by questioning the accuracy of a court transcript. Thomasons suit was dismissed and the court reporter then withdrew her action. But she persuaded Judge Weaver to use a court account funded by taxpayers, to cover her attorney fees, which came to about $16,000. Thomason and Stookey then obtained subpoenas for copies of those checks. So get this, the criminal charges against Thomason stem from the fact that on a open records request, he requested a copy of the actual cleared checks which according to several banks, some of these checks appear to have been deposited but cashed illegally. The DA claims that cashed illegally was a false statement, and he got a grand jury to indict the journalist for that (remember the old saying, you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich? Well it happened here). As for the identity theft charges, Im having trouble making sense of the legal justification but it has something to do with the fact that Thomason and Stookey didnt get Judge Weavers approval before sending subpoenas to a bank where the Judge maintained accounts for office expenses. According to the AJC, Weaver suggested the Thomason and Stookey could be trying to steal banking information. Both Weaver and the DA are standing by the charges. Even based on Weavers own statements, you cant help but come to the conclusion that the charges are politically motivated. I dont react well when my honesty is questioned, she said, according to the AJC. Its clear this is a personal vendetta against me. I dont know how else to explain that. Since the charges surfaced last week, several legal organizations have strongly come out in the journalists defense. The Society of Professional Journalists has called for the Georgia Attorney General to look into the matter. In fact, several local attorneys have called for Weaver to resign from Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission. That would be an obvious first step for her to take. In Georgia, like many states, there are few checks on district attorneys and judges once they assume office. This is a clear example of why there should be more. Editors Note: An earlier version referenced Fannin County Superior Court, it was actually the Appalachian Judicial Court, which includes Fannin County. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
#13. To: cranky (#0)
Sounds to me that an official complaint needs to be filed against this judge and even sue her in her personal capacity. Also, some phone calls and letters need to be written to the State Representatives of that district.
There are no replies to Comment # 13. End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|