Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Oakland Cops Uncover Dead Colleague's Fling With Underage Sex Worker, Make Sure to Get Her Number for Themselves
Source:
Reason
URL Source: https://reason.com/blog/2016/06/29/ ... ex-trafficking-when-cops-do-it
Published: Jun 29, 2016
Author: Elizabeth Nolan Brown
Post Date: 2016-07-01 09:53:13 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 9980
Comments: 49
The young woman at the center of a scandal shaking multiple California police departments has revealed new and damning facts about the situation. Celeste Guap, 18, claims to have had sex with more than 30 Bay Area police officers in exchange for cash, tips about upcoming prostitution stings, and protection from prosecution. Things allegedly started when she was still a minor and met Oakland officer Brendan O'Brien in the course of fleeing an abusive pimp. According to Guap, she and O'Brien began having sex in February 2015. "We [would] tell each other you're my only, you know, like that, but he knew what it was," she told ABC 7 in a recent interview. O'Brien's wife had died the previous year in what had been ruled a suicide but some suspected O'Brien of being involved in. Guap told the TV station that in September 2015, she celebrated her 18th birthday by traveling to Puerto Rico, where she found herself alone in a "rough area" and called O'Brien for help. He didn't pick up. She threatened to expose him for sleeping with her when she was still 17 and, when he still didn't respond, she did it, sending a text to a commanding officer at OPD detailing her relationship with O'Brien and several other OPD officers. She then sent a screenshot of the text to O'Brien. A few hours later, O'Brien committed suicide. "Guap appears to have some guilt about this, and perhaps some anger toward the dozens of other officers who contacted her for sex over the ensuing months," SFist reports. I don't know about you, but if my colleague had killed himself after being threatened with exposure by a teen sex worker, my impulse would be, at least, to avoid her. OPD officers, however, thought otherwise. Not only did those alerted to O'Brien and Guap's relationship not report it, they began allegedly contacting Guap—the daughter of an OPD dispatcher—for sex themselves. Guap said she eventually began sleeping with cops from neighboring areas, too, including Alameda County and San Francisco. She turned over an array of cell phone records to various departments to corroborate her claims. Since these allegations came out, two OPD officers resigned and three more were placed on administrative leave pending investigation. The Alameda County Sheriff's Office investigated four offiers, but determined that because Guap was 18 at the time they slept with her and they did not pay her in cash, no wrongdoing was involved. In total, Guap claims to have slept with 32 members of local law enforcement, although she claims only three paid her. The rest she slept with for information and protection from arrest, said Guap, who mostly did street-based sex work. I don't mean to deny Guap's agency, but when your choices are have sex with someone or get thrown in jail... It might not be rape as we commonly think of it, but it's sure as hell—if nothing else—an abuse of authority. It's coercion. And it's a direct result of the criminalization of prostitution, a system that seems to benefit no one but corrupt cops and violent sex traffickers. While all of this was happening with Guap, the Oakland and Alameda County police departments were very public crusaders against prostitution. In the first six months of 2014, Oakland police made 295 arrests related to prostitution and conducted 30 prostitution stings. "We don't have a lot of resources," said OPD Luitenenant Kevin Wiley at the time. "But the ones we have, we dedicate 110 percent." The city even ran billboards featuring the mugshots of men who were arrested for attempting to pay for sex. Another series of recent Oakland city billboards featured slogans such as: "Buying a teen for sex is child abuse. Turning a blind eye is neglect." "Buying a teen for sex is child abuse," warned Oakland city billboards as its police force passed around a teenager for sex.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.
#3. To: Deckard (#0)
Maybe the cops were all libertarians. What is the Libertarian party's stance on the statutory rape laws? True mixed age relationships seem weird & kinda wrong but it's okay for a 80 year old to have sex with a 18 year old so why cant it be okay for a 14-17 year old to willingly have sex with a adult? It's okay for a old man to take home a drunk 18 year old girl & sleep with her but it's not okay for a 15-16 year old guy to willingly have sex with a pretty 20 year old girl. Why is it okay for a old person to have sex with a drunk 18 year old but its not okay for a teenage minor to willingly have sex with a young adult? Anyways I was wondering if the other Libertarians agree with me. Do other Libertarians agree with my views? Does the Libertarian party support reforming the age of consent/statutory rape laws? do they support having a double standard with the age of consent laws where they only apply to girls but boys can have sex with adult women? If you completely agree with the current statutory rape laws then you are no libertarian, you are a draconian fascist.
The crap you reposted is not the official LP platform, but instead the opinion of a single person. BTW, are you a Democrat or Republican? I want to find some similar crap stated by someone from your party. I'll have an easier task than you. If you are serious about critiquing the official LP platform, here's a link: www.lp.org/files/2016%20LP%20Platform%20.pdf As in relates to the subject of this thread: Don't engage in libel, Gatlin. It's poor form.
I am an “Unaffiliated Conservative Voter.” Some folks like to say that means I am an “Independent Voter” … but I hate the “Independent” portion of the term, because what I vote on or whom I vote for is “dependent” on any number of strict considerations. Because I am a child of the depression born in the South, that is a starting point I can attribute it to, I hold closely to traditional conservative attitudes and values while viewing change and innovation with caution … especially in politics and religion. I embrace some aspects of the Republican Philosophy, the “sane” parts of the Libertarian Philosophy and none of the Democrat Philosophy that I can think of at this time. I have been described by those associated with me as “being objective to a fault.” I read and listen to all source of information from all sides of the political spectrum, for which I am often criticized for doing so while posting some of the liberal articles here. There have been “attempts” to ostracize me to Antarctica for reading and posting articles from SPLC by some narrow-minded individual who are closed-loop thinkers. One of the many things I learned during the year I spent at the USAF Air Command and Staff College (the second highest command and leadership school in the Air Force where only the top 10% of USAF officers are selected to attend) was to “know your enemy.” One of my favorite self-motivational phrases I use is from the move Patton where George C. Scott as Patton said during a tank battle: “Rommel...you magnificent bastard, I read your book!" I kinda vented here, but it was for a good cause … I wanted to give you all background (sans any personal information) you should have available to make your task of provoking me with “similar crap” as easy as possible for you. After all, I am a considerate person and full of empathy for those who strive to do a perfect job. I trust this information will be of some help to you and I wish you well. Good Day, Sir.
It's not the posting of articles from leftist sites that are a problem - it's the fact that you agree with the crap they post. The most recent example is the HuffPo "libertarians suck" screed that you posted. Oh, and who can forget you siding with the SPLC when you posted numerous anti-Ron Paul pieces and leftist propaganda condemning patriots penned by that reprehensible organization and stinking up Liberty Post in the process. Don't try and pretend you're objective - no one here is going to believe you.
There are no replies to Comment # 40. End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest I am a Libertarian & I am against the statutory rape laws. I think it is evil to arrest women for having sex with guys that are almost grown men. I understand arresting middle aged men for having sex with little kids but arresting adults for having sex with teens is just evil. Those laws are especially evil when a minor gets charged with statutory rape for example a 16 year old with a 12 or 13 year old.
#11. To: Gatlin (#3)
1.4 Personal Relationships
....
Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.
1.6 Parental Rights
Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs. This statement shall not be construed to condone child abuse or neglect.
#35. To: Pinguinite (#11)
BTW, are you a Democrat or Republican? I want to find some similar crap stated by someone from your party. I'll have an easier task than you.
#40. To: Gatlin (#35)
I read and listen to all source of information from all sides of the political spectrum, for which I am often criticized for doing so while posting some of the liberal articles here.
Replies to Comment # 40.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]