[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: How the French learned to love their police
Source: bbc,com
URL Source: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-36081915
Published: Apr 21, 2016
Author: John Laurenson
Post Date: 2016-07-01 00:05:00 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 507
Comments: 6

A record number of people have applied to join the French police force over the past year. Many new recruits say the recent attacks in Paris inspired them to sign up. It also seems that the shootings have made the country rethink its attitude towards the police.

Audrey is taking part in a self-defence class at the police training school in Sens, eastern France, having signed up after gunmen attacked the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish supermarket at the start of 2015. "Since the [Paris] terror attacks in January and November last year, the danger confronting us is clear," she says. "Any one of us can be a victim. Every one of us needs protection. And we all want to help somehow. That's why I'm here. To help make this country safer."

In March this year, a record 35,000 people sat the exam to join the police - 50% more than last year. Only 8% of those who took the test passed - the same success level as for the entrance exam for the elite Science-Po political science school in Paris.

"I was really shocked by the video from the Charlie Hebdo killings of the policeman who was on the ground, asking for mercy, who they shot in cold blood," says another recruit, Perez, when I ask him why he joined the police. I think these young people are discovering a sense of duty and the desire to help their fellow human beingsJacques Richard, Director of police training college

"That made me want to defend our republic, defend our nation even more. In the morning we'll wake up and know that maybe today we'll risk our lives but we're more motivated than ever," he says. The policeman Perez is talking about was called Ahmed Merabet, and the next recruit I talk to shares the same first name.

"I'm of Algerian origin," he says. "We had a lot of terrorism in Algeria when I was growing up. I remember the curfews when we went there on holiday. When the Bataclan happened in November I remembered Algeria, and in December I joined the police."

Three of the victims in the Charlie Hebdo and kosher supermarket attacks were police officers, and the live TV coverage of their colleagues storming the shop to save hostages led many to see them as heroes.

Then, in November, the first man to confront the attackers inside the Bataclan concert hall in Paris was an off-duty police officer who happened to be passing. He entered the building and shot one of the gunmen dead with his service revolver. A few days later police stormed a flat in St Denis, just north of the city, killing the suspected ringleader. "The terror attacks are a decisive factor for many in our new intake," says the director of the training college, Jacques Richard.

"I think these young people are discovering a sense of duty and the desire to help their fellow human beings. "When something like this happens, people pull together. Everyone wants to make their own contribution. There's been a big increase in the number of people volunteering to give blood, for example. And more people have wanted to join the emergency services and the police. It's had a big influence on the way people think." Image copyright EPA Image caption Policeman Ahmed Merabet was shot outside the Charlie Hebdo offices The image of the police in France has changed significantly over the past 20 years. The 1995 film La Haine, a hit both at the box-office and with the critics, portrayed the police as sadistic and racist. "It's an anti-police film," explained Mathieu Kassovitz, who won the best director prize for the movie at Cannes that year. When the cast climbed the famous festival steps, the police on duty there turned their backs in protest. The police have had an extremely negative image in France for centuries, says historian Jean-Marc Berliere, who's written several books about them.

"Even in Louis XIV's time the people loathed the police," he says. "In the public imagination the police meant repression and the limitation of freedom." A defining moment was May 1968 when police and rioting students fought pitched battles around Paris's Sorbonne University. That revolutionary movement spread to workers bringing the French economy to a virtual standstill for two weeks. Violence erupted when President Charles de Gaulle tried to sort things out by sending in the police. I couldn't believe it - here was a young, urban, intellectual crowd applauding the policeJean-Marc Berliere, Historian But the media always had a soft-spot for the paving-stone-hurling students. But four days after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, something extraordinary happened. People filled the streets of Paris to show their sympathy for the the victims and demonstrate their support for the police. A video posted on YouTube captures the moment.

The crowd parts. There are women running - some of them laughing. "What's going on?" says the man filming with his smartphone. And then, police - in vans and on foot. Their black rubber shoulder protection giving them the kind of silhouettes usually associated with science fiction heroes. And the crowd starts to chant, "Merci, merci" - Thank you, thank you.

"I couldn't believe it," says Jean-Marc Berliere who was there. "Here was a young, urban, intellectual crowd applauding the police! I saw women giving them flowers. I saw people shaking their hands. I saw women kissing them. And you could see how moved the police were. It was so unexpected."

For Audrey, it made her realise that "this job is, in fact, fantastic".

Something like this had happened only once before, says Berliere, at the liberation of Paris in August 1944. The police were the first to rise up against the Germans before the Allies got there. "Afterwards, when they marched, the crowds shouted 'Vive les flics!' - Long live the cops!" he says.

It's not clear if the police's popularity will last, or if it will sag like a souffle in a police canteen. A video of a police officer hitting a young black demonstrator at a recent demonstration against labour reforms has not helped their image. Neither has a book by renowned anthropologist Didier Fassin, La Force de l'Ordre (Security Forces). He was allowed to follow the police in one part of the Paris region from 2005 to 2007 and reports widespread brutality and racism.

But, for the time being at least, a significant part of the French population is seeing the police in a new way. As heroes.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Gatlin (#0)

The answer to this is obvious. The police are necessary to combat terrorism and violence, and people are inclined to appreciate and respect them for that, to change their view of them because of that.

The police are also known for their racism and tendency towards oppression. And the police need to stop acting that way.

It isn't an "accept the police as they are and change your mind" thing. It's an "accept the concept of the police and what they do at their best, and support that, while the police have to police themselves to be sure they meet the expectations of their people" thing.

Because traditionally the police were drawn from the less educated, working class types, they have tended to bring their native racism with them into the jobs and act it out there, under color of authority. THAT needs to be trained out of them. Because of the terrorism, the police are held in higher esteem than before. To keep that esteem high, they need to turn a page on the racism and petty oppression. The blacks, for example, are simply not the terrorists, So stop beating on them and giving them such a visibly hard time for incidents that amount to insults of honor.

Vicomte13  posted on  2016-07-01   7:41:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

You like the blacks and hate the Muslims. So who will support you more? The far left youth or the far righties here at LF?

goodnessmarlok  posted on  2016-07-01   8:17:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: goodnessmarlok (#2)

You like the blacks and hate the Muslims. So who will support you more? The far left youth or the far righties here at LF?

I don't hate "the Muslims", just like I never hated the Russians.

I hate Islam, just as I hated Soviet-style dictatorial Communism.

The problem is not the people. The problem is the ideas that motivate the people. Unfortunately, people raised with an idea tend to embody that ideal, because it infects them.

Muslims are infected with an idea, just as Germans were in the 1940s. The idea is rooted in utter evil. The terms of Islam are as grotesque as anything in Mein Kampf. And Muslims believe in that ideal, they think it's good.

Christians were once this way, back in the "burn witches" era. But Christians outgrew it, changed their theology and belief systems. Muslims have changed nothing, and believe that any attempt to change what has been handed down is ITSELF evil. The cultural, political, economic and violent control of all are fundamentally unified in Islam. It's an internally consistent self-reinforcing system. You cannot negotiate with it. When it is weak, it will pretend to be peaceful and kind and like you. The instant that it is strong, it will overthrow you and put you on your knees in chains.

It ALWAYS HAS, it ALWAYS WILL, and it WILL NOT, and CANNOT change, not ever. Nor do its people WANT it to change.

Muslims are religious Nazis. Swarming, breeding religious Nazis. They may conquer the world some day, and if they do, I may well practice my own form of Taqiyya. I also think that deception is a legitimate tactic in warfare.

Who will support ME more? I've never found anybody who supports me. I actually believe in the Declaration of Independence's proclamation that "All men are created equal", I don't hang an asterisk on that to tidy it away, and actually fight all efforts to do so, because I believe it.

In this, I am as radical as any of the American revolutionaries or St. Paul.

On the Right, I've never met anybody who really believes this. And on the Left they press for baby murder as the solution to sexual libertinism. Neither of them will support me, because they will not compromise on their evil alpha values.

So the question then is who I will support, since they will never come to me.

The answer is that I support those who look the most likely to advance something important in the immediate future.

I support Trump because he's angling at peace with Russia, which is something that a President can actually DO. I recognize that military spending is the biggest part of discretionary spending, and that the only way to bring the budget into line and start reducing debt is to slash the military budget, which means we need an environment in which we can do that, which means we need to come to good terms with the Russians, for both we AND they to be able to invest in something other than an endless arms race.

That's the truth. The best way to materially help the USA - that can actually be DONE - is a rejiggering of the relationship with Russia. Trump's the only one who will do that. So I'm with him. Now, I recognize that the Trump supporters are generally with him for other reasons, but I know that even if they win, they will be frustrated in their ability to enact those things. Let's look at the Hillary side. I know that substantively, if she wins, the Cold War continues and we plunge further along the road of debt towards eventually collapse. That's bad. On the other hand, I know that she will shore up universal health care, doing whatever it takes, and that's good (even though we will eventually go bankrupt from it unless we get the Russian situation right). So I support Trump more than Clinton, because Trump has aimed right at the changeable Alpha issue - the thing that CAN be adjusted to change course enough for long-term survival. But if Trump loses, I will not leave the country because of Clinton. Like Obama, she will do some things that I think are, on balance, good. I see the Right bleed out their eyes about things like Obamacare, and the Left bleed out their eyes over gays, and I roll my eyes and stay focused on what is most important. Ultimately, abortion is the moral alpha issue, but the only way to win on that is to get a President who will appoint strict pro-life justices who are activists. "States Rights" federalists will just throw the issue to the states, and we'll still have abortion, just as a matter of state law instead of federal. We need justices who understand that abortion is a fundamental human rights violation, who will smash it down constitutionally just as Roe imposed it constitutionally. Trump's list of judicial nominees might get us there. I think it will get us closer, which is another reason I support Trump. But if the Right stays home because they hate Trump over Trade, then the Left will win, and the Right will lose EVERYTHING under her. The Right will lose everything, but I won't, because I strongly support comprehensive social welfare. The Left supports that, the Right hates it. Whoever wins, I'll get some of what I support, and a lot of what I don't. I'm with Trump because he will move the BIGGEST pieces. But if he loses it's the end of the Right's world, not mine.

Vicomte13  posted on  2016-07-01   11:56:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#3) (Edited)

Alright, before I read this. I want to say my post was entirely tongue-in- cheek.

goodnessmarlok  posted on  2016-07-01   12:00:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#3)

Taqiyya is a Shiite concept, I want to say. and Sunnis dont believe in it. Neither do Salafists/Wahhabist(the dangerous Muslims)..

Good post however

goodnessmarlok  posted on  2016-07-01   12:05:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: goodnessmarlok (#5)

Sunnis believe it and practice it. And when they tell you they don't, they are practicing Taqiyya.

Vicomte13  posted on  2016-07-01   17:50:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com