[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Judge tosses Libertarian Frank Tamburri from U.S. Senate ballot
Source: Arizona Central
URL Source: http://www.azcentral.com/story/news ... rri-us-senate-ballot/86436176/
Published: Jun 28, 2016
Author: Mary Jo Pitzl
Post Date: 2016-06-28 21:28:23 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 8439
Comments: 48

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge John Hannah rejected arguments that Libertarians are subjected to unfair requirements for signatures on their nomination papers, and determined the naturopathic doctor lacked the required 3,034 signatures.

However, Tamburri is filing an appeal with the Arizona Supreme Court. If the lower-court ruling holds, there will be a primary only on the Republican ballot. Democrat Ann Kirkpatrick is running unchallenged.

If he's successful, Tamburri would be the sole Libertarian on his party's primary ballot, which means he would be on November ballot as the Libertarian standard-bearer.

Arizona Republican Party Chairman Robert Graham filed the complaint against Tamburri. Republicans suspected Tamburri was recruited by the Democrats to run, figuring he could pull votes away from the GOP nominee in what is expected to be a tough general-election race.

But Tamburri has maintained he is a genuine Libertarian, not a recent recruit to the party ranks. His defense in the petition challenge revolved around what he maintained were unfair signature requirements for minor parties. But Hannah cited a Georgia case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a signature requirement of 5 percent of registered voters in a given party. In Arizona, the requirement is one-quarter of 1 percent of voters — and that can include independents.

Remainder of the story is here.

Additional Comment:

The term “Libertarian” has long been synonymous with “Asshole” in my estimation, and I think it’s safe to say that Jacobin magazine editor Connor Kilpatrick probably feels the same way.

Today is the centenary anniversary of the birth of Libertarian icon, economist Milton Friedlman, so what better day for the publication of the most viciously hilarious takedpown of the Libertarian position that I think I’ve ever read?

Excerpted from the much longer “It’s Hip! It’s Cool! It’s Libertarianism!” which was cross-posted today at both Naked Capitalism and The Exiled:

Libertarianism isn’t some cutting-edge political philosophy that somehow transcends the traditional “left to right” spectrum. It’s a radical, hard-right economic doctrine promoted by wealthy people who always end up backing Republican candidates, no matter how often they talk about civil liberties, ending the wars and legalizing pot. Funny how that works.

It’s the “third way” for a society in which turning against capitalism or even taking your foot off the pedal is not an option. Thanks to our shitty constitution and the most violent labor history in the West, we never even got a social-democratic party like the rest of the developed world.

So what do we get? The libertarian line: “No, no: the problem isn’t that we’re too capitalist. It’s that we’re not capitalist enough!”

Genius.

At a time in which our society has never been more interdependent in every possible way, libertarians think they’re John fucking Wayne looking out over his ranch with an Apache scalp in his belt, or John fucking Galt doing…whatever it is he does. (Collect vintage desk toys from the Sharper Image?)

Their whole ideology is like a big game of Dungeons & Dragons. It’s all make-believe, except for the chain-mail–they brought that from home. Elves, dwarves and fair maidens for capital. Even with the supposedly “good ones”—anti-war libertarians—we’re still talking about people who think Medicare’s going to lead to Stalinism.

So my advice is to call them out.

Ask them what their beef really is with the welfare state. First, they’ll talk about the deficit and say we just can’t afford entitlement programs. Well, that’s obviously a joke, so move on. Then they’ll say that it gives the government tyrannical power. Okay. Let me know when the Danes open a Guantánamo Bay in Greenland.

Here’s the real reason libertarians hate the idea. The welfare state is a check against servility towards the rich. A strong welfare state would give us the power to say Fuck You to our bosses—this is the power to say “I’m gonna work odd jobs for twenty hours a week while I work on my driftwood sculptures and play keyboards in my a chillwave band. And I’ll still be able to go to the doctor and make rent.”

Sounds like freedom to me.

Standing ovation!

http://dangerousminds.net/comments/class_war_for_idiots_libertarianism_assholism

Read more of Connor Kilpatrick’s “It’s Hip! It’s Cool! It’s Libertarianism!” at either The Exiled or at Naked Capitalism. Trust me it’s a fantastic, totally worthwhile read.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

#14. To: Gatlin (#0)

A strong welfare state would give us the power to say Fuck You to our bosses—this is the power to say “I’m gonna work odd jobs for twenty hours a week while I work on my driftwood sculptures and play keyboards in my a chillwave band. And I’ll still be able to go to the doctor and make rent.”

Sounds like freedom to me.

Sounds like leftist horseshit to me - their typical distortion of "freedom" to mean "freedom from reality and from the consequences of one's own actions."

THIS is the "takedown of the Libertarian position" you elect to embrace?

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-29   14:15:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: ConservingFreedom (#14)

THIS is the "takedown of the Libertarian position" you elect to embrace?

I am presenting their viewpoint ... juat being "fair and balanced."

Surely you don't have a problem with fair and balanced ... or, do you?

Gatlin  posted on  2016-06-29   14:29:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Gatlin (#15)

juat being "fair and balanced."

Braying leftist morons have the same First Amendment rights as anyone else - but that doesn't obligate you, me, or LF to give them equal time.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-29   14:48:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: ConservingFreedom (#16)

juat being "fair and balanced."

Braying leftist morons have the same First Amendment rights as anyone else - but that doesn't obligate you, me, or LF to give them equal time.

You are absolutely correct, there is no obligation.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-06-29   15:08:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Gatlin (#17)

there is no obligation.

So why do it? Are you "fair and balanced" between God and the Devil?

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-29   17:54:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: ConservingFreedom (#18)

… there is no obligation.
So why do it?
That’s a “fair” question and I have often wondered why I have never been asked it before. While I appreciate your right to ask the question, you will need to respect my right to decline to answer.
Are you "fair and balanced" between God and the Devil?
That is an improbable analogy and I will explain why.

I use of the term “fair and balanced” to mean that fair is in accordance with the rules or standards; legitimate … while balance is taking everything into account, meaning fairly judged and equally presented.

To be fair and balanced between God and the Devil, I would need to fairly state the good and bad things about God and balance those with the good and bad things about the Devil.

Since I see God to have been conceived as being incorporeal, yet a personal being for the source of all moral obligations to the greatest conceivable existent … I therefore can only find good things about God.

While on the other hand the Devil is merely a name, among many other names, given to a supernatural entity who is the central embodiment of all evil … consequently, I can only find bad things about the Devil.

Ergo, there is the basis for your improbable analogy.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-06-29   21:50:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Gatlin (#22)

While on the other hand the Devil is merely a name, among many other names, given to a supernatural entity who is the central embodiment of all evil … consequently, I can only find bad things about the Devil.

Interesting - you believe in the existence of Satan, but you refuse to believe that there are evil people in high places, those with unlimited wealth and power who do his bidding.

How does one live with that kind of cognitive dissonance?

Deckard  posted on  2016-06-30   9:06:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Deckard (#31) (Edited)

Interesting - you believe in the existence of Satan, but you refuse to believe that there are evil people in high places, those with unlimited wealth and power who do his bidding.

I do NOT refuse “to believe that there are evil people in high places, those with unlimited wealth and power who do his bidding.” I need only to look no further than Obama, Hillary and Kerry to be fully aware that they have unlimited wealth and seemingly unlimited power to do, and are doing, the Devil’s bidding.

One of the many shortcomings you self-righteous Paultard shitheads have is that you not only try to tell people what to think, you believe you posses magical innate power to read someone’s mind and determine what they believe ... then become smugly moralistic and intolerant of the opinions and behavior or others.

How does one live with that kind of cognitive dissonance?

Oh, my sides … I cannot stop laughing at the irony of how you of all people can judge someone to have cognitive dissonance when your hyper tense anxiety constantly holds such a contradictory and incompatible attitude to the norm and lets you think you can decide what is right for all Americans and control how they think.

I have lived through a world where Obama leads and controls … I have survived. I could never live in a world where you Paultard libertarians would try to control all actions and thinking by free people. You Paultards can take your libertarian belief that you can determine when someone cannot think well and that you will do their thinking for them and shove it up your liberal asses.

Hmmm … I just remembered that someone the other day asked me why I have such great disdain for libertarians.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-06-30   10:31:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Gatlin, Deckard (#32)

your libertarian belief that you can determine when someone cannot think well and that you will do their thinking for them

When has Deckard or any libertarian proclaimed an intention to do anyone's thinking for them?

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-30   11:58:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: ConservingFreedom (#36)

your libertarian belief that you can determine when someone cannot think well and that you will do their thinking for them
When has Deckard or any libertarian proclaimed an intention to do anyone's thinking for them?

"Proclaimed - announce officially or publicly."

It is not necessary for someone to publically announce something in order to do it.

Get real ...

I know ... here comes the "rephrased question."

Gatlin  posted on  2016-06-30   12:10:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Gatlin (#37)

here comes the "rephrased question."

There went the semantic hairsplitting.

When has Deckard or any libertarian stated an intention to do anyone's thinking for them?

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-30   12:14:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 38.

#40. To: ConservingFreedom (#38)

There went the semantic hairsplitting.

"Words have meanings."

When has Deckard or any libertarian stated an intention to do anyone's thinking for them?
If you expect me to go back to various posts to parse sentences and point this out, then I must inform you that I will not take time to do that.

There have been instances where it was obvious to me that he was trying to channel my thinking.

Being "fair and balanced" ... I will, however, have no dispute with you should you interpret his phraseology differently while reading his posts to me.

Gatlin  posted on  2016-06-30 15:03:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com