[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: WashPost: America Can’t Declare Economic Independence Because Not Enough Whites
Source: Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi ... ndependence-not-enough-whites/
Published: Jun 24, 2016
Author: Julia Hahn
Post Date: 2016-06-25 10:07:27 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 2675
Comments: 20

The Washington Post is reporting that U.S. might not be able to follow in the U.K.’s footsteps in reclaiming its economic independence because of the nation’s demographic makeup, which is the result of four decades of record high green card issuances to foreign nationals.

In a piece entitled, “No, Brexit Isn’t A Good Sign For Trump,” Washington Post’s Kim Soffen writes:

“There are certainly similarities between the referendum and the [Trump] campaign. Both are largely driven by immigration… Both are nationalist movements. Both are an instance of the will of the people going against the wishes of the elite… And their demographic support looks quite similar too.”

Yet Soffen writes that Brexit may not be a harbinger for Donald Trump’s future electoral success because the U.S. does not have as many white voters as Britain does.

“Largely at issue here is demographics. The British electorate is overwhelmingly white – 87 percent of its population is, according to its 2011 census. That’s compared to the United States’ 74 percent in 2014. That difference is significant for what direction each country votes.”

Indeed, while establishment media has pushed the narrative that immigration is a much more significant issue in Europe than it is the U.S., the facts do not bear this out. The U.S. has accepted 10 million more migrants from outside its borders than the European Union has absorbed from outside its borders, even though the EU has 200 million more people than the United States. Indeed, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, minority babies now outnumber white babies in the United States.

Soffen reports that polling data suggests non-whites tended to support the globalist position over the nationalist policy.

“Just like more minority-dense areas in the United States, like cities, tend to vote Democrat, minority-dense areas in the United Kingdom tended to vote to stay in the EU. In London, where 60 percent of citizens are non-white according to the 2011 Census, 60 percent of votes went against Brexit, compared to 48 percent nationwide.”

“Since the U.S. is far more diverse than the U.K., Brexit’s predictive power is even weaker,” Soffen concludes.

The Washington Post suggests that in order to have nationalist policies, the U.S. has to have a large population of whites in its country. Perversely, the Washington Post is essentially arguing that foreign nationals do not seem to have a strong enough allegiance to their new country to support a nationalist agenda over a more global, internationalist agenda — an argument, which dramatically undercuts the Washington Post’s general narrative on immigration and contradicts a core theme of its human interests stories, which seem designed to advance legislation that would expand U.S. immigration.

The demographic makeup the United States—which the Washington Post posits is the reason the U.S. could perhaps be incapable of voting in favor of reclaiming its national sovereignty—is the result of a Ted Kennedy-backed 1965 immigration rewrite, which opened up America’s borders to the world.

Kennedy’s immigration law lifted the immigration caps that had been place and opened up U.S. visas to migrants all across the globe.

While about nine in ten of the immigrants who came to the United States during the 19th and 20th century hailed from Europe, the 1965 law inverted that figure. Today about nine out of every ten new immigrants brought into the country on green cards come from non-Western countries in Latin America, Africa, Asia or the Middle East.

Following the law’s passage, 59 million immigrants entered the United States. Including their children, it added 72 million new residents to the U.S. population.

In 1965, according to Pew, the country was 84 percent white, 11 percent black, 4 percent Hispanic and less than 1 percent Asian– i.e. it had a white population that very similar in size to the white population of the U.K. today.

Unless Congress proposes legislation to curb the U.S. autopilot visa issuances, Pew projects that in forty years time as a result of large-scale immigration, “no racial or ethnic group will constitute a majority of the U.S. population,” as “whites are projected to become less than half of the U.S. population by 2055.” Therefore, by 2065, the nation would be 46 percent white, 24 percent Hispanic, 14 percent Asian and 13 percent black.

However, members of the globalist caucus in Washington including House Speaker Paul Ryan, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and President Barack Obama, have all pushed to accelerate this demographic transformation and have championed proposals to dramatically expand the nation’s record high immigration admissions. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: cranky (#0)

"Yet Soffen writes that Brexit may not be a harbinger for Donald Trump’s future electoral success because the U.S. does not have as many white voters as Britain does."

I find it hard to believe that a legal Mexican-American working to support a family is happy with an illegal who takes his job.

He may face peer pressure in public to be anti-Trump, but in the privacy of the voting booth common sense (and self-preservation) will prevail.

misterwhite  posted on  2016-06-25   10:47:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: cranky (#0)

Only real Americans should be to vote. Not these foreifn3ers who mistakenly think they are citizens. Us real americans call them foreigners.

A K A Stone  posted on  2016-06-25   11:25:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#1) (Edited)

I find it hard to believe that a legal Mexican-American working to support a family is happy with an illegal who takes his job.

Regardless how the libtard media reports poll numbers, everyone will be surprised (like Britain was) after November when the millions of independent registered voters, who haven't been heard in the polls yet, make it loud and clear the we want diaper heads policed and deported, borders SECURED and capitalism to continue.

I can't wait to hear our Paultards cry after the election. lol

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2016-06-25   11:47:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite, A K A Stone (#2)

I find it hard to believe that a legal Mexican-American working to support a family is happy with an illegal who takes his job.

He may face peer pressure in public to be anti-Trump, but in the privacy of the voting booth common sense (and self-preservation) will prevail.

Only real Americans should be to vote. Not these foreifn3ers who mistakenly think they are citizens. Us real americans call them foreigners.

Demographics is destiny, as they say.

America will never again be 'one nation, under God'.

jmo.

There are three kinds of people in the world: those that can add and those that can't

cranky  posted on  2016-06-25   12:27:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: A K A Stone (#2)

Only real Americans should be to vote. 

Hispanics are a mixture of real Americans and whites. So all will be well in the garden.

A Pole  posted on  2016-06-25   12:34:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: cranky (#0)

Yet Soffen writes that Brexit may not be a harbinger for Donald Trump’s future electoral success because the U.S. does not have as many white voters as Britain does.

many
immigrants

especially
east
European
Cuban

are
virulently
anti
... liberal

they
had
enough
of
them
in
soviet
countries

I
would
say
the
same
for
most
Asian
countries
too

korea
Vietnam
loas
Cambodia
china

make
America
great
again

love
boris

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2016-06-25   13:10:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: cranky (#0) (Edited)

is the result of a Ted Kennedy-backed 1965 immigration rewrite, which opened up America’s borders to the world.

Yes, Kennedy backed it ... but "In total, 74% of Democrats and 85% of Republicans voted for passage of this bill." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality _A ct_of_1965#Legislative_history

Even back then, the GOPe was selling out America to give its corporate masters "cheap" (for them) labor.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-25   18:05:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: ConservingFreedom (#7)

What created such impetus for so much enthusiasm of opening the national borders?

buckeroo  posted on  2016-06-25   18:12:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: buckeroo (#8)

What created such impetus for so much enthusiasm of opening the national borders?

Like I said, one significant factor was: Even back then, the GOPe was selling out America to give its corporate masters "cheap" (for them) labor.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-25   18:25:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: ConservingFreedom (#9)

In 1965, America was at its zenith from an economics perspective as America was bustling with international trade. Today, America is at its lowest point in history for international trade, that is to say, USA marketable products shipped to over-sea markets.

Why do we need the same enthusiasm for immigration?

buckeroo  posted on  2016-06-25   18:38:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: buckeroo (#10)

Why do we need the same enthusiasm for immigration?

We don't need it - corporate globalists with no love for this country want it.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-25   18:51:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: ConservingFreedom (#11)

How can it be stopped?

buckeroo  posted on  2016-06-25   18:53:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: buckeroo (#12)

Be nice if we could do it by voting corporate lapdogs out of office - failing that, some might suggest shooting the bastards.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-25   20:25:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: ConservingFreedom (#13)

In both presented cases, I think there is a word for it ... dreamland. Any other choices?

buckeroo  posted on  2016-06-25   20:32:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: cranky (#0)

So, it takes whites to provide economic security according to the Washington Post? Okay. I know that Africa is pretty much a hell hole. Whatever.

Psalm 37

Don  posted on  2016-06-26   11:48:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: buckeroo (#14)

Any other choices?

Nothing leaps to mind. You have any suggestions?

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-26   14:15:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: ConservingFreedom (#16)

Nothing leaps to mind. You have any suggestions?

Voting for a third party candidate does not exactly get us any closer.

redleghunter  posted on  2016-06-27   16:55:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: redleghunter (#17)

Voting for a third party candidate does not exactly get us any closer.

What's a better answer?

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-27   17:06:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: ConservingFreedom (#18)

What's a better answer?

You and I both know all the choices stink. Some more than others.

redleghunter  posted on  2016-06-27   17:09:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: redleghunter (#19)

My choice is to vote for the policies I prefer, knowing that those will not be the policies of the winning candidate ... this cycle.

A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.

ConservingFreedom  posted on  2016-06-27   17:26:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com