Title: Robin's Peoples Forum Found Supporting BABY KILLING and Cop who TAZERED HIS OWN SON!!! TAIPAN Source:
00-Hotherp Reports URL Source:http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi Published:Sep 3, 2008 Author:Taipan Post Date:2008-09-03 23:42:39 by Coral Snake Keywords:Wooten, Palen, Tazer, Abortion, depopulation Views:7059 Comments:26
I'm 100% against censorship. I'm against it even more when there's only 2 people regularly posting on a site with only another 2-3 doing drive-bys. My parting shot there was that if I was going to be censored it may as well be on a site with more traffic.
Chan was a known quantity anyway...a lot of sleight of hand...Ann Coulter's books are all well footnoted too.
I'm 100% against censorship. I'm against it even more when there's only 2 people regularly posting on a site with only another 2-3 doing drive-bys. My parting shot there was that if I was going to be censored it may as well be on a site with more traffic.
I don't begrudge Robin for some of her "censorship". She just want a forum where there isn't so much insults and cursing. I can respect that if she is consistent. I guess she isn't though.
There were neither insults nor cursing. Nolu stated that it was illegal for the CIA to operate drones. I told him that he had no proof that the person actually operating the drone was CIA and not USAF.
He accused me of engaging in a "cross forum" war and censored the comment. Meanwhile, my response addressed both the article that he had posted and his subsequent comments.
IN a word, he's a pussy who can't stand the thought of someone seeing through and thus questioning his bullshit.
He won't come here any more because he knows he'll get crushed. And, believe me, he would get crushed. He didn't even have the balls to allow my comment "Please delete my account" to remain posted.
Well...he does the old office lawyer trick of overwhelming you with information hoping that you'll capitulate. Unlike most of those with whom he argues, I actually took the time to read his stuff and at that point it became pretty easy to pick apart his arguments.
He and I first went at it over Lincoln blockading the Rio Grande on the US side of the border...he cited some treaty between the US and Mexico that had been signed years prior, by a Mexican government that no longer existed, and guaranteed Mexico free navigation of the Rio Grande but only on Mexico's side of the border which was a fact that was pointed out to him several times and ignored by him several times.