United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Stephen Hawking baffled by dynamics of Trump's popularity
Source:
AP
URL Source: http://elections.ap.org/content/ste ... led-dynamics-trumps-popularity
Published: May 30, 2016
Author: staff
Post Date: 2016-05-30 14:46:19 by buckeroo
Keywords: None
Views: 7530
Comments: 62
The British astrophysicist told ITV's morning show Monday that the presumptive Republican Party candidate for U.S. president "is a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator." Hawking also appealed to British voters to vote to keep the United Kingdom inside the European Union in a June 23 referendum. He said remaining within the EU provided essential support for British scientific research as well as its economy and security. He said: "Gone are the days we could stand on our own against the world. We need to be part of a larger group of nations, both for our security and our trade."LONDON (AP) — Stephen Hawking understands the workings of the universe — but says he cannot fathom the popularity of Donald Trump.
WoW! Even Hawking is baffled by the "Trump Black Hole."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: buckeroo (#0)
The British astrophysicist told ITV's morning show Monday that the presumptive Republican Party candidate for U.S. president "is a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator." Sounds to me like he perfectly understands the popularity of Donald Trump. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Just proves even book smart people don't know it all. Trump kicking everyone's butt is easy to explain and comprehend if you can be honest to yourself.
I can understand how he is ... It is hard to define truly amazing.
RUBBISH! Hawking should stick to what he knows and stay out of politics and economics. It is clear the freedom loving Brits find the EU regulation stiffling and if they want less of it they should not yield to scare tactics. Britain wants to protect its borders, it cannot do so from within the EU. Britain allowed migration from other parts of the empire and understands better than most the consequence. A nation can develop without political integration with other nations, a nation can successfully trade without political integration. If Britain wants to leave the greater german economic bloc they should do so
Absoloutly. Spot on. The people of this country are gonna see a win by a greater landslide than they've seen in over 100 years. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Hawking has no accomplishments save celebrity.
Greater than Harding's 1920 win by 60-34 over Cox, eh? I'm bookmarking this one. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Demagogue: a leader championing the cause of the common people. Yep. That's Trump.
Bookmark it shitbag. It's my prediction. I could be wrong...who knows. I'm confident that Trump will WIPE THE FLOOR WITH SLICK WILLYS WHORE.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
'In his work, and in collaboration with Penrose, Hawking extended the singularity theorem concepts first explored in his doctoral thesis. This included not only the existence of singularities but also the theory that the universe might have started as a singularity. Their joint essay was the runner-up in the 1968 Gravity Research Foundation competition.[155][156] In 1970 they published a proof that if the universe obeys the general theory of relativity and fits any of the models of physical cosmology developed by Alexander Friedmann, then it must have begun as a singularity.[157][158] [159] In 1969, Hawking accepted a specially created Fellowship for Distinction in Science to remain at Caius.[160] 'In 1970, Hawking postulated what became known as the second law of black hole dynamics, that the event horizon of a black hole can never get smaller. [161] With James M. Bardeen and Brandon Carter, he proposed the four laws of black hole mechanics, drawing an analogy with thermodynamics.[162] To Hawking's irritation, Jacob Bekenstein, a graduate student of John Wheeler, went further—and ultimately correctly—to apply thermodynamic concepts literally.[163][164] In the early 1970s, Hawking's work with Carter, Werner Israel and David C. Robinson strongly supported Wheeler's no-hair theorem that no matter what the original material from which a black hole is created it can be completely described by the properties of mass, electrical charge and rotation.[165][166] His essay titled "Black Holes" won the Gravity Research Foundation Award in January 1971.[167] Hawking's first book, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, written with George Ellis, was published in 1973.[168] 'Beginning in 1973, Hawking moved into the study of quantum gravity and quantum mechanics.[169][168] His work in this area was spurred by a visit to Moscow and discussions with Yakov Borisovich Zel'dovich and Alexei Starobinsky, whose work showed that according to the uncertainty principle rotating black holes emit particles.[170] To Hawking's annoyance, his much- checked calculations produced findings that contradicted his second law, which claimed black holes could never get smaller,[171] and supported Bekenstein's reasoning about their entropy.[172][170] His results, which Hawking presented from 1974, showed that black holes emit radiation, known today as Hawking radiation, which may continue until they exhaust their energy and evaporate.[173][174][175] Initially, Hawking radiation was controversial. However, by the late 1970s and following the publication of further research, the discovery was widely accepted as a significant breakthrough in theoretical physics.[176][177][178] Hawking was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS) in 1974, a few weeks after the announcement of Hawking radiation. At the time, he was one of the youngest scientists to become a Fellow.[179][180]' - https://en.wikip edia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking#Career A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. ROTFL! You backpedal faster than Lance Armstrong pedals forward. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Source? Dictionary.com defines it as "a person, especially an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people." A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Hawking isn't smart he is a f'n retard.
Tell us about your discoveries in general relativity and quantum physics, Brainiac. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Merriam-Webster
What Merriam-Webster actually says: 1 : a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power 2 : a leader championing the cause of the common people in ancient times A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. He believes if two monkeys fuck they make humans. A FUCKING RETARD!
Wasn't he the guy who walked close to the event horizon of a black hole and a chocolate bar melted in his pocket? And that led to the invention of the iPhone? So there's that.
There you go.
Theories with no applications are not accomplishments, especially when they have been refuted.
You gave as the definition a misleadingly truncated version of the secondary definition. There we go indeed.
A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. By your shabby 'logic' all of quantum chromodynamics, for example, contains no accomplishments. Not a refutation, boob: "peers have yet to have a go at assessing his idea". A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. His being Hawking's. He refuted himself. Bwahahaha!
I gave an old, yet valid, definition.
He's the G.R.R.M. of celebrity "scientists."
Still wrong, boob - he offered a hypothesis with only the supporting argument that it resolved an apparent paradox in a way arguably more satisfying than other proposed resolutions. And if later science shows earlier science to be incorrect, the earlier science remains no less an accomplishment, cf. Isaac Newton. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. His fame rests on that incorrect "science" (empty theorizing), which he now refutes. Therefore, you want people to support Hillary. Or Epstein. Or that naked sicko who was prancing about at the Libertine convention.
No, theorizing backed by rigorous calculation. Wrong no matter how often you repeat it. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Just like Global Warming. Just out of curiosity, what would you say was the single most useful application of the black hole theorizing Hawking now rejects?
Perplexing boobs like you. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. I figured you would punk out.
Quantum chromodynamics has no useful applications - dismiss it if you like, but your betters know better.
A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. You're such a craven coward. Let's try again: Just out of curiosity, what would you say was the single most useful application of the black hole theorizing Hawking now rejects?
Try putting 2 and 2 together, dimwit. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. And the coward flees again.
Ah, what the hell, I'll spoonfeed you: black hole theory has had no useful applications to date. So what?
A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Do you fuck monkeys?
Do you fuck monkeys? No, that's not the black holes we're talking about. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. The retard thinks he is the offspring of monkeys. So hawkingshithead thinks you fuck your monkey wife.
Stephen Hawking: “there are no black holes”
Comments (41 - 62) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latesthe cannot fathom the popularity of Donald Trump.
#2. To: buckeroo (#0)
Stephen Hawking understands the workings of the universe — but says he cannot fathom the popularity of Donald Trump.
#3. To: buckeroo (#0)
(Edited)
Stephen Hawking baffled by dynamics of Trump's popularity
#4. To: buckeroo (#0)
We need to be part of a larger group of nations, both for our security and our trade."
#5. To: Justified (#2)
Trump kicking everyone's butt is easy to explain and comprehend if you can be honest to yourself.
#6. To: buckeroo (#0)
Even Hawking is baffled
#7. To: GrandIsland (#5)
The people of this country are gonna see a win by a greater landslide than they've seen in over 100 years.
#8. To: buckeroo (#0)
#9. To: ConservingFreedom (#7)
#10. To: Roscoe (#6)
Hawking has no accomplishments save celebrity.
#11. To: GrandIsland (#9)
I could be wrong
#12. To: misterwhite (#8)
(Edited)
Demagogue: a leader championing the cause of the common people.
#13. To: Justified (#2)
#14. To: A K A Stone (#13)
Hawking isn't smart he is a f'n retard.
#15. To: ConservingFreedom (#12)
Source?
#16. To: misterwhite (#15)
Merriam-Webster
#17. To: ConservingFreedom (#14)
#18. To: Roscoe (#6)
"Hawking has no accomplishments save celebrity."
#19. To: ConservingFreedom (#16)
#20. To: ConservingFreedom (#10)
In 1970, Hawking postulated what became known as the second law of black hole dynamics, that the event horizon of a black hole can never get smaller.
published last week on arXiv, says: “there are no black holes”- SCIENCE & TECH 27 JANUARY 2014
#21. To: misterwhite (#19)
#22. To: Roscoe (#20)
Theories with no applications are not accomplishments,
especially when they have been refuted.
published last week on arXiv, says: “there are no black holes”- SCIENCE & TECH 27 JANUARY 2014
#23. To: ConservingFreedom (#22)
"peers have yet to have a go at assessing his idea".
#24. To: ConservingFreedom (#21)
"You gave as the definition a misleadingly truncated version of the secondary definition."
#25. To: misterwhite (#18)
Wasn't he the guy who walked close to the event horizon of a black hole and a chocolate bar melted in his pocket?
#26. To: Roscoe (#23)
He refuted himself.
#27. To: ConservingFreedom (#26)
if later science shows earlier science to be incorrect
#28. To: Roscoe (#27)
His fame rests on that incorrect "science" (empty theorizing),
which he now refutes.
#29. To: ConservingFreedom (#28)
theorizing backed by rigorous calculation
#30. To: Roscoe (#29)
what would you say was the single most useful application of the black hole theorizing
#31. To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
#32. To: Roscoe (#31)
#33. To: ConservingFreedom (#32)
Quantum chromodynamics
#34. To: Roscoe (#33)
Let's try again:
#35. To: ConservingFreedom (#34)
Try putting 2 and 2 together
#36. To: Roscoe (#35)
#37. To: ConservingFreedom (#36)
#38. To: A K A Stone (#37)
"black hole theory has had no useful applications to date."
#39. To: ConservingFreedom (#38)
#40. To: ConservingFreedom (#36)
black hole theory has had no useful applications to date
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]