LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Black Outrage Over Gorilla Shot To Protect ‘White Privilege’. Just One Problem…
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/london/201 ... te-privilege-just-one-problem/
Published: May 30, 2016
Author: James Delingpole
Post Date: 2016-05-30 08:24:15 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 5341
Comments: 30
Well I do too. Especially when you realise – at least by some accounts – that the gorilla was actually trying to protect the child not kill it. But I don’t think in the outrage stakes any of us can quite compete with the angry black people in social media forums who have been blaming the incident on entrenched white privilege. That gorilla was taken from it’s homeland, put in captivity, and then killed to preserve White life. That sounds familiar. — Isa Ibn (@IsaIbnOfficial) May 29, 2016 That gorilla was black, unarmed and 17 — Kar L. Stine (@karyewest) May 29, 2016 Killing an endangered gorilla at a zoo for a white boy’s safety is white privilege. If the boy was black they would’ve found a tranquilizer. — Hood Intellect (@NelsonEmpowered) May 29, 2016 There’s just one flaw in this GorillaLivesMatter thesis. Can you guess what it is? Wait a minute so you guys spent all day talking about white parenting practices & the gorilla boy is black? Oh boy lol. — EdAsante (@EdAsante77) May 29, 2016
Do you feel strongly about Harambe, the hapless gorilla executed by Cincinnati zoo to protect the life of the four-year old child Isaiah whose stupid, irresponsible parents allowed him to crawl into the gorilla’s pen?
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#2. To: cranky (#0)
I like how the writer of this article, the filthy libtarded tree hugger he or she is, is so much more qualified to know how that gorilla will react when confronted with removal of the child. F' you, libtards and your warm fuzzy loving empathetic fantasy world you live in. Real Life doesn't always play out as WEAK as you've evolved.
From reported first person accounts, cell phone videos and statements from gorilla specialists that were all included in the news stories I've read, would be my guess.
#4. To: cranky (#3)
(Edited)
That makes all you libtards experts, huh Cranky? Your witnesses watch it first hand and by God, they must know more than the animal handlers how this gorilla will react to actual confrontation. Keep posting your libtarded articles to carry forward your closet libtarded views of (D) platform animal rights. This article was written to promote an equality idiology amongst the weak minded sheeple of today... by inflaming those that haven't a clue.
Jim Fowler, you know - the animal guy was on this morning. His take on it was that they did the right thing killing the gorilla instead of trying to tranquilize it, mostly due to the unknown reaction from the gorilla when being shot by a dart. Plus it takes a while for the tranq to take effect. I agree. Apparently the mom only looked away for a few seconds, there's no evidence she was neglectful.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWell I do too. Especially when you realise – at least by some accounts – that the gorilla was actually trying to protect the child not kill it.
#3. To: GrandIsland (#2)
I like how the writer of this article, the filthy libtarded tree hugger he or she is, is so much more qualified to know how that gorilla will react when confronted with removal of the child.
Replies to Comment # 3. From reported first person accounts, cell phone videos and statements from gorilla specialists that were all included in the news stories I've read, would be my guess.
#9. To: cranky (#3)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]