LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Black Outrage Over Gorilla Shot To Protect ‘White Privilege’. Just One Problem…
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/london/201 ... te-privilege-just-one-problem/
Published: May 30, 2016
Author: James Delingpole
Post Date: 2016-05-30 08:24:15 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 5336
Comments: 30
Well I do too. Especially when you realise – at least by some accounts – that the gorilla was actually trying to protect the child not kill it. But I don’t think in the outrage stakes any of us can quite compete with the angry black people in social media forums who have been blaming the incident on entrenched white privilege. That gorilla was taken from it’s homeland, put in captivity, and then killed to preserve White life. That sounds familiar. — Isa Ibn (@IsaIbnOfficial) May 29, 2016 That gorilla was black, unarmed and 17 — Kar L. Stine (@karyewest) May 29, 2016 Killing an endangered gorilla at a zoo for a white boy’s safety is white privilege. If the boy was black they would’ve found a tranquilizer. — Hood Intellect (@NelsonEmpowered) May 29, 2016 There’s just one flaw in this GorillaLivesMatter thesis. Can you guess what it is? Wait a minute so you guys spent all day talking about white parenting practices & the gorilla boy is black? Oh boy lol. — EdAsante (@EdAsante77) May 29, 2016
Do you feel strongly about Harambe, the hapless gorilla executed by Cincinnati zoo to protect the life of the four-year old child Isaiah whose stupid, irresponsible parents allowed him to crawl into the gorilla’s pen?
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#2. To: cranky (#0)
I like how the writer of this article, the filthy libtarded tree hugger he or she is, is so much more qualified to know how that gorilla will react when confronted with removal of the child. F' you, libtards and your warm fuzzy loving empathetic fantasy world you live in. Real Life doesn't always play out as WEAK as you've evolved.
From reported first person accounts, cell phone videos and statements from gorilla specialists that were all included in the news stories I've read, would be my guess.
Jim Fowler, you know - the animal guy was on this morning. His take on it was that they did the right thing killing the gorilla instead of trying to tranquilize it, mostly due to the unknown reaction from the gorilla when being shot by a dart. Plus it takes a while for the tranq to take effect. I agree. Apparently the mom only looked away for a few seconds, there's no evidence she was neglectful.
You mean other than her child ending up in the gorilla pit. But you're right. New rule. If the mother looks away less than, say, five seconds, she's not at fault if her child ingests poison, runs into traffic, sticks a paper clip into an electrical socket, pulls the trigger on a loaded gun, whatever.
Can you imagine if the mother was an off duty cop and she looked away for just one second... or if she was on duty and she looked away for one second... and OMG, an animal died. Can you imagine just how assholish Puckard would have been?
Apparently your reading comprehension is lacking. I already stated that they did the right thing killing the gorilla. No why don't you just calm down and think before you post?
There are no replies to Comment # 18. End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWell I do too. Especially when you realise – at least by some accounts – that the gorilla was actually trying to protect the child not kill it.
#3. To: GrandIsland (#2)
I like how the writer of this article, the filthy libtarded tree hugger he or she is, is so much more qualified to know how that gorilla will react when confronted with removal of the child.
#9. To: cranky (#3)
#11. To: Deckard (#9)
"Apparently the mom only looked away for a few seconds, there's no evidence she was neglectful."
#13. To: misterwhite (#11)
But you're right. New rule. If the mother looks away less than, say, five seconds, she's not at fault if her child ingests poison, runs into traffic, sticks a paper clip into an electrical socket, pulls the
#18. To: GrandIsland (#13)
your tree hugging, animal loving closet libtard bullshit
Replies to Comment # 18.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]