United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Cops Murder Woman’s Three Dogs, Shooting One Through a Locked Door — To Look for Pot
Source:
Free Thought Project/Dailyu News
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/i- ... -cannabis/#T7WwMaO2T5HyyBFJ.99
Published: May 28, 2016
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2016-05-28 18:26:54 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 21033
Comments: 118
Detroit, MI — Three of Detroit’s finest, Officer Gaines, Officer Paul, and Officer Morrison, are named in a recent lawsuit after they entered a woman’s home, hunted down her dogs, and murdered them all. The officers were serving a search warrant in search of one of the most beneficial plants on the planet which is currently outlawed in the state of Michigan. After cops murdered all the dogs, they came to the owner of the home, Nikita Smith, and said, “I should have killed you too,” according to the lawsuit. According to Smith, when the cops came to the door to tell her they had a warrant to look for marijuana, she asked them if she could secure the dogs. Smith put two dogs in the basement and locked one in the bathroom. But the fact that the dogs were secured, did not matter to these cruel officers. “They went around and killed them. Like a death squad,” Smith’s lawyer Chris Olson told the Daily News on Thursday. As the Daily News reports: After officers entered the home, one of the dogs was able to get out of the basement, and harmlessly sat next to Smith. As Smith reached for the dog, officers shot the animal “multiple times,” the lawsuit charges. Smith watched from less than 10 feet away as the dog, named Debo, died on the floor. Three officers then went to the basement and fatally shot a dog named Mama, who was pregnant. Mama was quiet and not attacking the cops at the time, according to the lawsuit. When the sadistic cops found the last dog in the bathroom, according to the suit, they discussed if they should kill it or not. It was locked in a bathroom. “Should we do that one too?” one cop asked. “Yes,” replied the other as Officer Gaines and Officer Paul opened fire, shooting through the door multiple times killing the dog on the other side, named Smoke. “Did you see that? I got that one good!” Officer Gaines said as he laughed, according to the lawsuit. According to Smith, after the officers killed all of her dogs, one of them walked up to her and said, “I should have killed you too.” Then, another officer told her, “you could have been killed.” Pictures from the scene show Smith’s home riddled with bullet holes. They also show the tragically brutal aftermath of Smoke flailing around the bathroom as officers shot through the door. Blood quite literally painted the walls. “I couldn’t believe my eyes,” Olson said. Cops incorrectly believed that Smith’s home was a drug house and during the raid, they found only marijuana. “They had a warrant to search the house,” Olson said. “That we don’t really quarrel with. But when you search the house, you can’t go in the house and kill all the dogs.” Smith was arrested on charges of possession of marijuana — a misdemeanor. For possessing a plant, police officers felt it was just to break into Smith’s home, kill her dogs, kidnap her, and throw her in a cage — and this is called ‘Justice’ in the land of the free. The charges against Smith, however, were later thrown out as the cops who broke into her home and murdered her dogs never bothered to show up to court. Cannabis has been shown to kill cancer cells, save the lives of countless epileptic children, treat PTSD, heal bones, treat brain trauma, and a slew of other uses science is only beginning to understand. And yet, the only thing dangerous about this seemingly miraculous plant is that police will kidnap, cage, or kill you or your pets for possessing it. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-27) not displayed.
.
.
.
#28. To: nolu chan (#3)
Murder. The unlawful killing of a human being by another with malice aforethought, either express or implied. It is legally impossible to murder a dog. Does that include Police Dogs? If not, how is there an exception? The womb, the most dangerous place on earth.
The word is Ratsach, and it means the taking of defenseless human life. Thou shalt not kill (ratsach). Such as the baby in the womb and euthanasia such as the murder of Terri Schiavo. The womb, the most dangerous place on earth.
Tranquilizer darts.
The womb, the most dangerous place on earth.
We may disagree there old friend. The womb, the most dangerous place on earth.
They shoot back. The womb, the most dangerous place on earth.
Why do you ask such ignorant questions? There is no state that charges the offender with murder for the intential killing of ANY ANIMAL including a police K9. Most people with a half of brain would already know without paging through a states penal code that EVERY state that desires charges be filed against a person that injures or kills a police animal has MADE A SEPARATE CHARGE FOR THAT PARTICULAR CRIME because no state could possibly prove "murder" when talking about an ANIMAL as a victim. No animal equals human life, no, not even a police K9, the Kentucky Derby winning horse or even Lasy himself... the idea that an animal is on the same "equal" status as a human being IS A LIBTARD IDEAL... you show your colors. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
HOW do you KNOW this to be a fact? Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. if you look around, we have gone so far down the the rat hole, the almighty is going to have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah, if we don't have a judgement come down on us. President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood "I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
Your dog is not worth one human life. We'll have to agree to disagree. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Dog owner? :)
A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. HOW do you KNOW this to be a fact? How do you KNOW the author, Matt Agorist, stated FACTS in the article? That would be the first question an intelligent person with general cognitive problem-solving skills would ask … est-ce pas droit ?
They shoot back. Exactly. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Even IF that was true, the does not excuse the cops shooting THROUGH the LOCKED DOOR to kill the dogs. Being locked in the bathroom they posed NO THREAT! You know, when you post shit like this in an absurd attempt to defend this kind of psychopathic behavior, I can't help but believe that you are just as mentally fucked up as these sadistic cops are. How do you know the dogs were in a locked bathroom? Speaking of posting shit, it is you who posted a shit article containing only hearsay and opinions ... then you believe it's the Gospel. I am not defending the cops ... I am merely trying to point out that we don't know what happened and have no basis on which to form opinions.
You don't seriously expect Matt Agorist to have included in his yellow journalism article that they did ... do you? No mention of it in the Daily News story either. You do know how to click on a link, don't you? No mention of it in the Daily News story either. Oh, since there was "no mention" of it ... then we should take it as a fact that the dogs did not threaten the cops. No Mention = Valid Confirmation? Are you that stupid ... and that is not a rhetorical question. Do you know how to have an open mind and look objectively at anything? The answer to that "be" NO!!!
Did you see the fucking picture, or are you blind? I'm done with you here asshole. It's the same bullshit with you every time. You have displayed on numerous threads like this one that you're a sick and sadistic man with no moral compass - a disturbed individual with a deep seated authority fetish. You have a mindset that says cops are gods and nothing they do may be questioned and frankly, you and your repulsive ilk sicken me. I'm done with you here asshole. It's the same bullshit with you every time. You have displayed on numerous threads like this one that you're a sick and sadistic man with no moral compass - a disturbed individual with a deep seated anarchy fetish. You have a mindset that says criminals and drug addicts are gods and nothing they do may be questioned and frankly, you and your repulsive ilk sicken me. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
You don't even have the intelligence to post something original? Yep - typical room temperature IQ cop. Maybe you and Gatslime should get a room and blow each other. Did you steal Deckard's post contents just above?
Ordinarily I would have to agree with you. But in certain cases, I must say that it depends strongly on the human(s) and the particular animal. There is a breed of dog know as the Rough Collie. Like Lassie in the movies and on TV, the Rough Collie is a friendly dog that is intelligent, active and good with children, people and other animals. Rough collies have a history of being incredibly loyal and protective of their owners, making them excellent family dogs and compatible with people when out and about mingling with society. Take the case of a Rough Collie named Sassy. She is a therapy dog with some pretty amazing skills. In addition to being trained to perform typical tasks for a therapy dog, Sassy is able to tell if someone is going to have a seizure using her sense of smell. A family is hoping to adopt Sassy for their son who suffers from an unusual form of epilepsy, which can cause him to have several seizures a day. Now, if Buckard and Pukard could be trained to do the same as Sassy and become as intelligent, active and good with people as a Rough Collie … then I would agree with you that no animal equals a human life. Until then, we will just have to agree to disagree … with respect to these two Paultards.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
My intent wasn't originality, it was to show how much of an asshole you are by just changing a few of your own words. Douche I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Seeking facts before making a firm opinion is NOT bullshit. I have a mindset that searches for factual information and I will not "shoot from the hip" like you do after reading an article that obviously presents only one side and therefore must be determined to be biased. You are done here because you have tunnel vision that only sees what you want to see and "you can't handle facts." You are frighten of me standing up to you and challenging you to consider all aspects of a situation ... so you are running away.
YOu use this same thing over ... and over ... and over. Get something new. Wait, that's an impossible task for you.
Try to improve your reading comprehension, dummy. He is paraphrasing to make a point. You didn't even read the whole post before you commented. That is so typical of you ...
I got it right away. These idiots never read for comprehension.
That wasn't paraphrasing, dummy. It was "parroting."
I'd call it intellectual laziness and lack of originality. But what do you expect from a guy who spent his career as a mindless enforcement drone for the State? Call it whatever your warped mind wishes to call it ... it carried a real meaning.
Being a file clerk at a TV station spreading main stream lies is a mindless and meaningless job ...
How could Deckard's post, which was plagerized by GrandIsland, have any meaning for GrandIsland or to the readers? The "meaning" was completely removed just because of the vulgar author: GrandIsland.
Only removed from the warped and diseased mind of a Paultard. You have a problem with that ... and this is not a question.
I have a problem with everything about the infamous and irreputable kanary klub klan performs for word, thought and deed.
Then I will be glad to help you with that. First, take a large 2-foot square piece of old dirty rough cardboard and write on it: Then, roll it into a large diameter tube and jam it up your Paultard ass. Now, Problem gone "BYE-BYE" and will no longer be a bother to little Bucky boy.
Whoa! Tater is getting pissed! The invectives are quickly streaming to cover up his earlier tirades.
I am never pissed. I just have a unique way of expressing things in a manner that Paultards can comprehend. Try the remedy for your problem ... but promise not to sigh and smile while performing the task.
How do you know that he did not? And what is the source of your info: " " With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door " " " That would be the first question an intelligent person with general cognitive problem-solving skills would ask … est-ce pas droit ? " Take your own advice. Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. if you look around, we have gone so far down the the rat hole, the almighty is going to have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah, if we don't have a judgement come down on us. President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood "I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
pissed
" How do you KNOW the author, Matt Agorist, stated FACTS in the article? " How do you know that he did not? I don’t know if Matt Agorist presented “facts” or “judgments” in the article. I do however know that I go through a thought process each time I read an article to ask myself, “Can I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that this is true?” If the answer is yes, then it’s a fact, and I begin the process of acceptance. On the other hand, if there is even a tiny bit of doubt and wiggle room … then it’s a judgment. Unlike a fact, a judgment is open to interpretation and can be questioned, challenged and disputed … for me, that’s exactly what needs to be done. I do what I do … I challenge a judgment. Challenging a judgment isn’t an easy thing to do. But the first step is simply recognizing that a judgment is more subjective than objective. And that provides a certain degree of comfort in and of itself. It appears that it is a natural tendency for some people to accept a judgment as a fact without even realizing it. Or, when they read something they want to believe, they will accept it as a fact and not realize it is a judgment. Facts have very little power to hurt us, but it’s only when we insert a painful judgment that we can suffer and cause others to suffer. You missed my point with the Cujo parody, it was used to show that many things are possible and we really don’t know what went on behind a closed bathroom door. I do know that one of the dogs was an American Pit Bull Terrier and based on the article, it would be pretty safe to make a judgment that the other two dogs were the same breed. It did not go unnoticed by me that Mat Agorist mentioned “dog(s)” twelve times in the article and not once did use “Pit Bull(s).” Why not? Was it because these fearful two words would nullify the sympathy conditioning he was leading his readers towards? Probably so. I feel that is what an intelligent person with general cognitive problem- solving skills would do … I have done so and therefore I have taken my own advice. If you want to accept what Matt Agorist had to say as fact, believe it and condemn the cops, then that is your prerogative to do so … est-ce pas droit?
Many insurers will often not provide homeowner’s insurance coverage Pit Bulls because of the massive volume of attacks and because they are so vicious. Quite frequently, these dogs repeatedly make headlines for attacking people. Their aggressive temperament matched with their strength historically saw them bred as fighting dogs. Pit bulls have been known to attack the elderly, their owners, attack and eat small children – anyone that happens to be in their path. If the dog feels provoked or startled, it has been known to attack. Many owners swear that their pet would never attack them; however, this breed has led to more human fatalities than any other. it also cannot be denied that this particular breed is responsible for more fatalities than any other type of dog. I can imagine the Pit Bull behind the bathroom door acting the way I depicted Cujo, but you can imagine the Pit Bull as a docile lap dog cowering in the corner afraid of the big bad cops if you choose to do so. " Well, Mr " I want the facts ". I reread the posted article, and went to the source link, and not once did I see " Pit Bull " spelled out. Yet you injected the word into your post. Why is that ? Simple, to inject fear so others will sympathize with the cops, and try to justify their actions. Because the cops were wrong, and everyone here knows it. Looks like you are making up shit there sarge. Not very truthful! Not a sign of " an intelligent person with general cognitive problem- solving skills ". More like a BSer, making up lies ! Go back to being a cop groupie. Maybe some will let you polish their badge, LOL Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. if you look around, we have gone so far down the the rat hole, the almighty is going to have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah, if we don't have a judgement come down on us. President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood "I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
polish their Fixed it. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.
Comments (69 - 118) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestBlack's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.
#29. To: Justified (#5)
I always thought murder was taken of an innocent life.
#30. To: Justified (#9)
#31. To: A K A Stone (#11)
Your dog is not worth one human life. You just showedd Yourself to be stupid.
#32. To: Stoner (#17)
Wonder why these hero's do not go & raid some large drug traffickers, or the Bloods & Crips, Black Panthers, Muslim Brotherhood ?
#33. To: BobCeleste (#28)
(Edited)
Does that include Police Dogs?
#34. To: Gatlin (#21)
" With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door, I would damn well think … no, scratch that … I would damned well know that Cujo was exhibiting dominant behavior which crossed the line to aggression. "
#35. To: A K A Stone (#11)
"My dog was worth approximately 500 of these thug cops."
#36. To: BobCeleste (#31)
#37. To: Stoner (#34)
(Edited)
" With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door, I would damn well think … no, scratch that … I would damned well know that Cujo was exhibiting dominant behavior which crossed the line to aggression. "
#38. To: BobCeleste, Stoner (#32)
"Wonder why these hero's do not go & raid some large drug traffickers, or the Bloods & Crips, Black Panthers, Muslim Brotherhood ?"
#39. To: Gatlin (#21)
With Cujo behind the bathroom engaged in excessive low-range barking; snarling; growling, snapping and scratching at the bathroom door, I would damn well think … no, scratch that … I would damned well know that Cujo was exhibiting dominant behavior which crossed the line to aggression.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
#40. To: Deckard (#39)
(Edited)
Being locked in the bathroom they posed NO THREAT!
#41. To: Gatlin (#23)
Nowhere have the cops claimed that the dogs threatened them.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
#42. To: Deckard (#41)
(Edited)
Nowhere have the cops claimed that the dogs threatened them. You don't seriously expect Matt Agorist to have included in his yellow journalism article that they did ... do you?
#43. To: Gatlin (#40)
How do you know the dogs were in a locked bathroom?
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
#44. To: Deckard (#43)
#45. To: GrandIsland (#44)
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
#46. To: GrandIsland (#44)
#47. To: GrandIsland (#33)
No animal equals human life ...
#48. To: Deckard (#45)
(Edited)
#49. To: Deckard (#45)
You don't even have the intelligence to post something original?
#50. To: Deckard (#43)
It's the same bullshit with you every time.
#51. To: Deckard (#45)
Maybe you and Gatslime should get a room and blow each other.
#52. To: buckeroo (#46)
#53. To: GrandIsland (#49)
#54. To: Gatlin, Deckard (#52)
(Edited)
He is paraphrasing to make a point.
#55. To: buckeroo (#54)
That wasn't parphrasing, dummy. It was "parroting."
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
#56. To: buckeroo (#54)
#57. To: Deckard (#55)
But what do you expect from a guy who spent his career as a mindless enforcement drone for the State?
#58. To: Gatlin (#56)
it carried a real meaning.
#59. To: buckeroo (#58)
(Edited)
The "meaning" was completely removed just because of the vulgar author: GrandIsland.
#60. To: Gatlin (#59)
You have a problem with that
#61. To: buckeroo (#60)
(Edited)
I have a problem with everything about the infamous and irreputable kanary klub klan performs for word, thought and deed.
I have a problem with everything about the infamous and irreputable kanary klub klan performs for word, thought and deed.
#62. To: Gatlin (#61)
#63. To: buckeroo (#62)
(Edited)
#64. To: Gatlin (#37)
" How do you KNOW the author, Matt Agorist, stated FACTS in the article? "
#65. To: Gatlin (#63)
unique way
#66. To: Stoner (#64)
Many insurers will often not provide homeowner’s insurance coverage Pit Bulls because of the massive volume of attacks and because they are so vicious. Quite frequently, these dogs repeatedly make headlines for attacking people. Their aggressive temperament matched with their strength historically saw them bred as fighting dogs. Pit bulls have been known to attack the elderly, their owners, attack and eat small children – anyone that happens to be in their path. If the dog feels provoked or startled, it has been known to attack. Many owners swear that their pet would never attack them; however, this breed has led to more human fatalities than any other. it also cannot be denied that this particular breed is responsible for more fatalities than any other type of dog. I can imagine the Pit Bull behind the bathroom door acting the way I depicted Cujo, but you can imagine the Pit Bull as a docile lap dog cowering in the corner afraid of the big bad cops if you choose to do so.
Since there is no way for me to determine if what Matt Agorist published is fact, judgment or opinion … I can therefore neither condemn nor condone the actions by the cops.
#67. To: Gatlin (#66)
" not once did use “Pit Bull(s).” Why not? Was it because these fearful two words would nullify the sympathy conditioning he was leading his readers towards? Probably so.
#68. To: Stoner (#67)
badge baton.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]