The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles
Title: So we are down to a one horse race
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 4, 2016
Author: paraclete
Post Date: 2016-05-04 18:54:57 by paraclete
Keywords: None
Views: 6307
Comments: 36
Kacish has apparently quit the race along with Cruz and will sit it out on the bench waiting for the convention when someone might throw him a bone or perhaps he is hoping a calamity will befall Dump. This makes the next few weeks interesting but not newsworthy so we can expect the media to find something else to write about, no doubt Kerry's interest in Syria will rate a mention and we will get updates on progress of the war on daesh, you remember that war
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: paraclete (#0)
Say it, bitch. PRESIDENT TRUMP.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
He got Cruz to drop out of the race . Mission accomplished . I'm sure he'll be rewarded with a VEEP selection ,despite his denial that he is interested in the position.
Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)
Yes politics makes strange bedfellows and sometimes you have to stay one back to win later. Dump will need someone with organisational skills to find the funding needed and the ground support as well as that good savvy on how the House and Senate work, despite appearances bull and bluster don't work there
If sometthing befalls Trump, the convention will choose Jeb!, and, all things considered, that would probably even be their best choice. The rest are cranks or fringe elements or childish. And without Trump the GOP won't win anyway, so may as well let the Bushes make a three-fer out of it all.
Trump's best choice would be Ryan. Actually, his BEST choice would be Sanders, but he's already ruled that out. Kasich WOULD have been his best choice, but Kasich proved to be a delusional clown. Christie doesn't have legislative experience. Rubio...meh. Boehner would anger the base too much. Gingrich is too old and too morally compromised.
When did that stop someone holding high office, I thought it was a requirement of the job
Why are you in a hurry to vote for Trump? What has he ever suggested that he advocates individual liberties and freedoms?
When has GrandIsland ever suggested that he favors individual liberties and freedoms? A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. The only individual freedoms and liberties he seems to enjoy is waving a night stick and flashing a badge; of course, along with all his gear he loves his hand held "STOP" sign while accompanying little kids to/from elementary school.
I like the fact that he values the freedom to be as rich as you can be (capitalism, dumb dumb) or as dirt poor as your lazy ass will allow. He won't show weakness towards the dyfunctionally lazy like both the loser (R) and (D) regular career politicians. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Only a moron would say something so stupid. An anti christian.
So you gonna vote for the cunt Hillary?
So you advocate totalitarianism, correct? You know, multi-internationalist business organizations that control government by the 2% of he population. What does 'dumb dumb' mean in your quaint little essay?
Not now, not ever. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. But you are ok if she beats Trump without your vote.
I'm not OK with either of them. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Social welfare is as Christian as transubstantiation. The thing is, Sanders and Trump are close on at least four key things, including foreign policy, trade, the need for honesty in government, and the need to take care of American workers. Also, they're both protective of gun rights, Sanders more than Trump. AND each mobilized huge voter bases running as outsiders. The Republican Establishment failed to stop Trump, but the Democrat establishment will stop Bernie with super delegates. There are going to be a lot of pissed off Independents and Bernie Democrats who will be furious to have had the election stolen by chicanery. If Bernie were on the ticket with Trump, they'd follow him, and there would be a great centrist uniting for common sense things. As Veep, Sanders' crazy ideas would be off the table, and he'll be too old to be President in 8 years. So really, Trump/Sanders is a sure way to win the election. But don't worry. Trump has already flatly said he'll choose a Republican Veep.
You're a liar. Like your father the devil. It has already been proven to you. But you ignore scripture. You would even vote for mass murder baby killers such as Hillary.
You're a communist. I'm sure Trump would be ashamed of you.
Only liberals are ok with Hillary. Trump is to conservative for your liking.
I'm not worried. I'm just pointing out you are foolish.
Ergo, I'm not a liberal. Trump has long been a crony capitalist voicing support for liberal positions while lining the pockets of liberal politicians. He's played "conservative" for no longer than he's had serious presidential ambitions. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Good post. Trump even brags about the fact.
I like his America First foreign policy.
and has all the right check offs ......woman ; Hispanic ,governing experience ,conservative . Sounds like a perfect fit for Susana Martinez . But he will also consider the importance of 2 big swing states ;Ohio and Fla. That means he may go with Kaisich or Scott Walker . Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)
Seriously I think it is a bridge too far
That bone might be the other losing candidates throwing their delegates to Kasick?
Psalm 37
Also a moron, with Satan for a father. As you say you've "proven" from Scripture. Have you ever read the Bible cover to cover?
Paul Ryan.
Uh yes you are. Do you support NAFTA? If you do that is a liberal thing. Go you support GATT? If so you are a liberal. Do you support TPP? If so you are a liberal. Are you against Trumps wall? If so you are even more of a liberal.
That is something a liberal tard would say. Affirmative action is a liberal position. Just like your position on trade. At least you're a social conservative.
Do you support NAFTA? If you do that is a liberal thing. Go you support GATT? If so you are a liberal. Do you support TPP? If so you are a liberal. Are you against Trumps wall? If so you are even more of a liberal. No, no, no, and no. Now you can take your foot out of your mouth. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. and you think Trump isn't thinking that way ? Why was Nikki Haley floated as a possible running mate ? You forgot to add that Martinez is also conservative and has similar positions on border security . Anyway ,it is not happening . Martinez openly criticized his tone and wants nothing to do with him. That makes how many who have publicly declined ? Newt or Christie may be the only options . Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)
Jeff Sessions?
I'd consider voting for that ticket. A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them. Great choice . I'd take him . But I think the only reason Trump would take him is if he thought he desperately had to shore up his support with the base. I get the impression that Trump wants to forge a different base of support. This week he was openly courting the Bolshevick Bernie supporters . Oh, miserable mortals! Oh wretched earth! Oh, dreadful assembly of all mankind! Eternal sermon of useless sufferings! Deluded philosophers who cry, “All is well,” Hasten, contemplate these frightful ruins, (Voltaire)
#2. To: paraclete (#0)
#3. To: tomder55 (#2)
I'm sure he'll be rewarded with a VEEP selection
#4. To: paraclete (#0)
perhaps he is hoping a calamity will befall Dump.
#5. To: paraclete (#3)
(Edited)
#6. To: Vicomte13 (#5)
Gingrich is too old and too morally compromised.
#7. To: GrandIsland (#1)
#8. To: buckeroo, GrandIsland (#7)
Why are you in a hurry to vote for Trump? What has he ever suggested that he advocates individual liberties and freedoms?
#9. To: ConservingFreedom, GrandIsland (#8)
#10. To: buckeroo (#7)
Why are you in a hurry to vote for Trump? What has he ever suggested that he advocates individual liberties and freedoms?
#11. To: Vicomte13 (#5)
Actually, his BEST choice would be Sanders, but he's already ruled that out.
#12. To: ConservingFreedom (#8)
#13. To: GrandIsland (#10)
capitalism, dumb dumb
#14. To: A K A Stone (#12)
So you gonna vote for the cunt Hillary?
#15. To: ConservingFreedom (#14)
Not now, not ever.
#16. To: A K A Stone (#15)
But you are ok if she beats Trump without your vote.
#17. To: A K A Stone (#11)
Only a moron would say something so stupid. An anti christian.
#18. To: Vicomte13 (#17)
Social welfare is as Christian as transubstantiation
#19. To: Vicomte13 (#17)
#20. To: ConservingFreedom (#16)
I'm not OK with either of them.
#21. To: Vicomte13 (#17)
But don't worry. Trump has already flatly said he'll choose a Republican Veep.
#22. To: A K A Stone (#20)
"I'm not OK with either of them."
Only liberals are ok with Hillary.
Trump is to conservative for your liking.
#23. To: ConservingFreedom (#22)
Trump has long been a crony capitalist voicing support for liberal positions
#24. To: ConservingFreedom, buckeroo, GrandIsland (#8)
Why are you in a hurry to vote for Trump?
#25. To: paraclete (#3)
Dump will need someone with organisational skills to find the funding needed and the ground support as well as that good savvy on how the House and Senate work, despite appearances bull and bluster don't work there
#26. To: tomder55 (#25)
#27. To: paraclete (#0)
#28. To: A K A Stone (#21)
I'm not worried. I'm just pointing out you are foolish.
#29. To: tomder55 (#25)
#30. To: ConservingFreedom (#22)
Ergo, I'm not a liberal.
#31. To: tomder55 (#25)
and has all the right check offs ......woman ; Hispanic
#32. To: A K A Stone (#30)
Uh yes you are.
#33. To: A K A Stone (#31)
and has all the right check offs ......woman ; Hispanic
#34. To: tomder55, A K A Stone (#33)
Newt or Christie may be the only options .
#35. To: nolu chan (#34)
Jeff Sessions?
#36. To: nolu chan (#34)
Jeff Sessions?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]