United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Security Stops Middle Schoolers From Singing The National Anthem At 9/11 Memorial
Source:
From The Trenches/Daily Sheeple
URL Source: http://www.fromthetrenchesworldrepo ... -anthem-at-911-memorial/158950
Published: Apr 27, 2016
Author: Melissa Dykes
Post Date: 2016-04-27 08:49:58 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 13478
Comments: 70
This is the epitome of modern Orwellian America. A group of 51 middle schoolers from North Carolina traveled all the way to the 9/11 memorial and decided to sing the national anthem. They were stopped — from singing the national anthem at the 9/11 memorial — halfway through by 9/11 memorial security because, well, it seems they didn’t have the proper permit. “You have to stop. This is considered a public demonstration!” one of the guards of one of Disneyland of American false flag monuments with a $60 million/year operating budget shouted at kids who don’t understand how misplaced their patriotism has become in modern America. Even though the teacher had previously asked a security guard for verbal permission, that was not good enough. The teacher was supposed to apply for a permit, pay $35 in fees, and wait the requisite ten days so the kids would be granted the permission by the memorial staff to sing the national anthem. The punchline? Waynesville Middle School principal Trevor Putnam reportedly said the whole incident was a great lesson in civics, NOT because they could have discussed the First Amendment or destruction of the Bill of Rights, but then he could ask the kids “Why are there limits put in place in public forums?” Why indeed. Delivered by The Daily Sheeple Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily Sheeple. Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheepleand a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 58.
#1. To: Gatlin, misterwhite, Roscoe, GrandIsland (#0)
They were stopped — from singing the national anthem at the 9/11 memorial — halfway through by 9/11 memorial security because, well, it seems they didn’t have the proper permit. Well, the "law is the law", right guys?
Quote it.
Quote it. Hey - you clowns are the ones spouting "the law is the law" nonsense. I'm sure you would agree that security acted appropriately in this case. I'm betting you would have cheered if a thugscrum of cops had been released on these lawbreakers.
Do you consider quoting the Bible to be nonsense?
Misquoting the bible is worse than mere nonsense. Romans 13 refers to "legitimate" government and "law(s)" only. Since you don't understand the difference between good and evil government, you'll never "get it". Powers Not Ordained By God Romans 13 is probably the most devastating thing to a Christian in the hands of the ungodly. It sounds so convincing to obey those who appear to be in power. For too long, secular governments have used Romans 13 as a club to beat Christians into obedience to them. Just because a group maintains power through their guns and jails, does not mean God put them there. God said there are powers not ordained by Him at Hosea 8:4, "They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not." God didn't put them in power over the righteous. That's Satan's idea. The righteous don't need worldly, filthy authorities, which are no authorities at all. Do you think that they can instruct the righteous? They themselves steal. They themselves are perverts. And they presume to instruct the righteous? I don't think so.
Does Romans 13 say that YOU can decide which government and what laws are legitimate? Why are you truth challenged?
No, Deckard has made it abundantly clear that only a Paultard is capable of deciding that.
Seems to me that Romans 13 lays out the legitimate functions of government. Anything else maybe isn't legitimate government.
Paul lays it out this way: Nowhere do I find where Paul said one could pick and choose which laws they want to follow or disobey, with one exception. He did say that you could resist government authority and the law could be disobeyed if they did not follow God’s law. Am I right on wrong on this? Paul doesn’t go into specifics and what he does not say, and I think we all believe … is that if the government officials who are servants of God screw things up, then they should be removed from office. I fully expect that removal will start from the top down under Trump. GO TRUMP!!!
I have already addressed this in a couple of posts, which you cowardly ran away from. Should We Obey Authority … No Matter What? The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is coordinating with Christian ministers nationwide so that –if the government imposes MARTIAL LAW – the ministers will urge their flocks to OBEY the government. A number of Christian leaders say that Christians must obey the government … no matter what. For example, Robert Deffinbaugh – pastor at Community Bible Chapel in Richardson, Texas – says: Whether the government be totalitarian or democratic, the Christian’s obligation to submit to it is the same. This is not an unrealistic or abstract concept. After all, most churches in Nazi-era Germany supported the Nazis. The German clergy used the same rationale to support Hitler that many American churches are using today to demand obedience to authority … Romans 13:1-7 ***** Your urging Christians to lay down like sheep and obey government "no matter what" is blasphemous. In reality, Christian (and Jewish) leaders throughout history have explained that we must disobey tyrannical governments. The Book of Maccabees – an ancient Jewish book purporting to document the events which Chanukah celebrates – apparently says: Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God. Gordan Runyan – pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church – points out numerous instances in the Bible of men and women who disobeyed their government rulers, and were rewarded by God and praised as holy. Indeed, the Bible mentions “justice” more than almost any other topic. The Bible demands that we do justice and to stand up to ANYONE — including the rich or powerful — who do injustice or oppress the people. Baptist minister Chuck Baldwin writes: Did John the Baptist violate God’s principle of submission to authority when he publicly scolded King Herod for his infidelity? Did Simon Peter and the other Apostles violate God’s principle of submission to authority when they refused to stop preaching on the streets of Jerusalem? Did Paul violate God’s principle of submission to authority when he refused to obey those authorities who demanded that he abandon his missionary work? In fact, Paul spent almost as much time in jail as he did out of jail. Remember that every apostle of Christ (except John) was killed by hostile civil authorities opposed to their endeavors. Christians throughout church history were imprisoned, tortured, or killed by civil authorities of all stripes for refusing to submit to their various laws and prohibitions. Did all of these Christian martyrs violate God’s principle of submission to authority? So, even the great prophets, apostles, and writers of the Bible (including the writer of Romans Chapter 13) understood that human authority – even civil authority – is limited. Any government that is a “terror to good works” is acting beyond its authority and must be resisted.
#59. To: Gatlin, hondo68, Fred Mertz (#58)
Uh that isn't in the Bible.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestA group of 51 middle schoolers from North Carolina traveled all the way to the 9/11 memorial and decided to sing the national anthem.
#3. To: Deckard (#1)
Well, the "law is the law"
#5. To: Roscoe, misterwhite, Gatlin, GrandIsland (#3)
Well, the "law is the law"
#11. To: Deckard, Roscoe, misterwhite, GrandIsland (#5)
Hey - you clowns are the ones spouting "the law is the law" nonsense.
#16. To: Gatlin, the liar, Satanic preacher, Romans 13 1-7, Deckard (#11)
Do you consider quoting the Bible to be nonsense?
Get a Grip!
If Romans 13 does not mean "obey the State," what does it mean? Romans 13 means, "Remember them which have the rule over you," as you will also find at Hebrews 13:7. Since Paul was addressing the saints at Rome, it is logical that he would instruct them to submit to those who look after their souls. It is a reminder to be obedient to the authorities God has placed over His people. For they are truly the "ministers of God to thee for good." Unlike worldly rulers, God's ministers are not a terror to good works but to the evil. Therefore, "do that which is good and thou shalt have praise of the same."
Romans 13:1-7
#17. To: hondo68 (#16)
Romans 13 refers to "legitimate" government and "law(s)" only.
#50. To: Gatlin (#17)
Does Romans 13 say that YOU can decide which government and what laws are legitimate?
#53. To: GrandIsland, Gatlin, pinguinite, vicomte13 (#50)
#55. To: A K A Stone, GrandIsland, pinguinite, vicomte13 (#53)
(Edited)
Seems to me that Romans 13 lays out the legitimate functions of government. Anything else maybe isn't legitimate government.
“First (13:1) Paul states that every person is to be subject to the governing authorities, because God is the sovereign who ordains all human governments. Then (13:2) he draws the implication: If you resist government authority, which God has established, you are opposing God Himself and you’ll come under judgment. Then (13:3-4) Paul explains that the purpose of civil government is to protect law-abiding citizens and punish law-breakers. As such, the government is acting as a minister of God in avenging wrong. Thus (13:5) there are two reasons to be in subjection to the government: Fear of punishment and conscience before God, who has ordained the government. Finally (13:6-7), Paul applies it by showing why we should pay taxes, namely, because government officials are servants of God. Thus they deserve our taxes as well as our respect.”
#58. To: Gatlin, A K A Stone (#55)
Nowhere do I find where Paul said one could pick and choose which laws they want to follow or disobey, with one exception. He did say that you could resist government authority and the law could be disobeyed if they did not follow God’s law. Am I right on wrong on this?
The Bible Urges Us to CHALLENGE – Not Obey – Bad Government
Replies to Comment # 58. Gatlin - "Bow down to your corrupt rulers."
#62. To: Deckard (#58)
Book of Maccabees
End Trace Mode for Comment # 58.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]