Title: Security Stops Middle Schoolers From Singing The National Anthem At 9/11 Memorial Source:
From The Trenches/Daily Sheeple URL Source:http://www.fromthetrenchesworldrepo ... -anthem-at-911-memorial/158950 Published:Apr 27, 2016 Author:Melissa Dykes Post Date:2016-04-27 08:49:58 by Deckard Keywords:None Views:12780 Comments:70
This is the epitome of modern Orwellian America.
A group of 51 middle schoolers from North Carolina traveled all the way to the 9/11 memorial and decided to sing the national anthem.
They were stopped from singing the national anthem at the 9/11 memorial halfway through by 9/11 memorial security because, well, it seems they didnt have the proper permit.
You have to stop. This is considered a public demonstration! one of the guards of one of Disneyland of American false flag monuments with a $60 million/year operating budget shouted at kids who dont understand how misplaced their patriotism has become in modern America.
Even though the teacher had previously asked a security guard for verbal permission, that was not good enough. The teacher was supposed to apply for a permit, pay $35 in fees, and wait the requisite ten days so the kids would be granted the permission by the memorial staff to sing the national anthem.
The punchline?
Waynesville Middle School principal Trevor Putnam reportedly said the whole incident was a great lesson in civics, NOT because they could have discussed the First Amendment or destruction of the Bill of Rights, but then he could ask the kids Why are there limits put in place in public forums?
Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheepleand a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!
A number of Christian leaders say that Christians must obey the government no matter what.
For example, Robert Deffinbaugh pastor at Community Bible Chapel in Richardson, Texas says:
Whether the government be totalitarian or democratic, the Christians obligation to submit to it is the same.
This is not an unrealistic or abstract concept. After all, most churches in Nazi-era Germany supported the Nazis. The German clergy used the same rationale to support Hitler that many American churches are using today to demand obedience to authority Romans 13:
The German Christians were strongly nationalistic, and adopted respect for state authority. This passage in Romans 13 was often cited as proof of a correlation between the Church and State:
Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore he who resists the authorities resists the what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment.
German church leaders even criticized Christians for disobeying their governing authorities by protecting Jewish refugees by hiding them in their homes.
*****
Of course, spineless "Christians" like you will obediently turn over your firearms the day they become illegal to own, and I dare say you will turn in your neighbors who own guns because...you know - "The Law".
Those who fought for the independence from the British - they disobeyed "the law".
So did those who helped slaves escape and those who refused to move to the back of the bus.
The Bible is filled with godly individuals who defied authority when they were commanded to do acts of evil. Daniel disobeyed Darius and went to the lions den. Moses parents hid him from Pharaoh as a baby. Rahab lied to protect the Hebrew spies.
Paul was constantly being jailed, beaten, and scourged because he would not stop preaching the Good News. Jesus himself also repeatedly defied the powerful political and religious leaders of his day. So much so, that Jesus finally got nailed to a Roman cross for it!
Truth is treason in the empire of lies. - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Gordan Runyan pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church points out numerous instances in the Bible of men and women who disobeyed their government rulers, and were rewarded by God and praised as holy.
Did John the Baptist violate Gods principle of submission to authority when he publicly scolded King Herod for his infidelity? Did Simon Peter and the other Apostles violate Gods principle of submission to authority when they refused to stop preaching on the streets of Jerusalem?
Did Paul violate Gods principle of submission to authority when he refused to obey those authorities who demanded that he abandon his missionary work? In fact, Paul spent almost as much time in jail as he did out of jail.
Remember that every apostle of Christ (except John) was killed by hostile civil authorities opposed to their endeavors. Christians throughout church history were imprisoned, tortured, or killed by civil authorities of all stripes for refusing to submit to their various laws and prohibitions. Did all of these Christian martyrs violate Gods principle of submission to authority?
So, even the great prophets, apostles, and writers of the Bible (including the writer of Romans Chapter 13) understood that human authority even civil authority is limited.
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
We live in a country where the Rule of Law is the legal principle that law should govern, as opposed to being governed by arbitrary decisions from individuals to do what they choose we can do, or not do.
Very odd and confused comment: ---
--- "We live in a country ---- opposed to being governed by arbitrary decisions from individuals to do what they choose we can do, or not do." ---
We live in a country where, --- arbitrary decisions from individuals choose - what -- we can do, or not do?
I'd say that you don't know what you are talking about ... as usual.
It is no insult to be called crazy as a loon. If loons could hire a lawyer, they could sue for defamation of character anyone who uses the phrase crazy as a loon. They are, in fact, very smart birds and have done very well in the never- ending struggle for existence with nature and man.
I only asked you to cite an example where quoting the Bible justifies obeying a law that is immoral since I have never heard anyone do that.
Then apparently we agree that immoral laws should not be obeyed. In which case, the bible ref is of no relevance.
Of course, as a US Air Force officer, I was permitted under Section 16c(1)(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to refuse to follow a general order or regulation that was contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it.
I could say that there is no "significant" bearing upon the point at hand. But, I could not rule out it being germane so as to imply "a fitness" for or appropriateness to the point.
Gatlin (#13) --- We live in a country where the Rule of Law is the legal principle that law should govern, as opposed to being governed by arbitrary decisions from individuals to do what they choose we can do, or not do.
Very odd and confused comment: ---
We live in a country where, --- arbitrary decisions from individuals choose - what -- we can do, or not do?
Are you 'all there'? -- As in cogent?
I'd say you're crazy as a loon.
True ... and this needs to change.
Even our Presidents, as individuals, cannot make such arbitrary decisions.
But perhaps you could cite an example, proving you're not Looney.
Pinguinite (#28) (Edited) -- I only asked you to cite an example where quoting the Bible justifies obeying a law that is immoral since I have never heard anyone do that.
Of course, as a US Air Force officer, I was permitted under Section 16c(1)(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to refuse to follow a general order or regulation that was contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it. ---- I could say that there is no "significant" bearing upon the point at hand. ----- But, I could not rule out it being germane so as to imply "a fitness" for or appropriateness to the point. ----- Gatlin
Here again we see your 'Looney' reasoning, unbecoming to an officer in the US Air Force.
IF (big if) you indeed were ever an officer, or even in the air force.
Gatty and I did this once before at LP, and he didn't show shit.
Ahem ...
#70. To: tpaine, Goldi-Lox (#68) So? When will you meet the terms of the challenge? I'm still waiting. You are not waiting on me, the terms have long since been complied with to Goldi. Gatlin posted on 2014-05-15
#91. To: tpaine (#80) I have all of Gatlin's personal info. But no one else can have access to it. So, what's your point? To make us jump thru your hoops? Just a pain in the ass. Yes. That'd be you. Goldi-Lox posted on 2014-05-18
#93. To: Goldi-Lox (#91) I [Goldi] have all of Gatlin's personal info. Wonderful. Glad to hear he's an honest man who is who he says he is [Boldness Added] tpaine posted on 2014-05-18
Man, that's a low blow. --- I'm sure tater will show us his DD214.
Gatty and I did this once before at LP, and he didn't show shit.
Well, I don't blame him. ---- I pulled out my DD214 about six years ago when I applied for a cemetery reservation. --- Other than that, it stays in my black box.
All I had when I signed up with VA heath care was my little pocket DD214. --- Surprisingly they pulled up a full sized copy in no time flat. --- Good luck if you as an individual try to get any more info out of records tho.
Gatty and I did this once before at LP, and he didn't show shit.
#70. To: tpaine, Goldi-Lox (#68) So? When will you meet the terms of the challenge? I'm still waiting. You are not waiting on me, the terms have long since been complied with to Goldi. Gatlin posted on 2014-05-15
#91. To: tpaine (#80) I have all of Gatlin's personal info. But no one else can have access to it. So, what's your point? To make us jump thru your hoops? Just a pain in the ass. Yes. That'd be you. Goldi-Lox posted on 2014-05-18
#93. To: Goldi-Lox (#91) I [Goldi] have all of Gatlin's personal info. Wonderful. Glad to hear he's an honest man who is who he says he is tpaine posted on 2014-05-18
To: tpaine (#80) I have all of Gatlin's personal info. But no one else can have access to it. So, what's your point? To make us jump thru your hoops? Just a pain in the ass. Yes. That'd be you. Goldi-Lox posted on 2014-05-18
#93. To: Goldi-Lox (#91) I [Goldi] have all of Gatlin's personal info.
Wonderful. Glad to hear he's an honest man who is who he says he is tpaine, tongue in cheek...
What did you expect me to say to a sick woman who was ready to ban me?
Never did find out how much it cost you to get her to post that.. Got honesty?
Never did find out how much it cost you to get her to post that.. Got honesty?
I would have at one time expected you to be truthful and honorable.
And I you, but that all changed when you took advantage of a dying confused old man, harrowup, and a dying woman, as above...
But I no longer hold that expectation, since you have been blatantly exposed as a liar.
All you exposed was your ability to get Goldie to say she had your info.. SHE DID NOT VERIFY THAT YOU WERE AN OFFICER IN OUR ARMED SERVICES.
I now find it difficult and near impossible to associate with or post to anyone with such low character.
Associate? How weird. -- But sure, don't post if that turns you on. --- You'll once again join the fine company of clowns who can't rationally debate, and hide behind the bozo.
Some gave him Hell afterwards because he mispronounced a couple of words. The little mouthy shit behind the podium in the news room led the charge ... as though he should say anything after Obama mispronounced "corpsman." You may remember that instead of pronouncing "korman" ... he called it "corpseman."
The only thing I observed is that someone need to tell Trump to hold his hands still. He can be animated in the board room, but it is distracting when he continually waved his hands on TV. Just my opinion.
I am sure you can find a transcript or a video on the Web ...
#55. To: A K A Stone, GrandIsland, pinguinite, vicomte13 (#53)(Edited)
Seems to me that Romans 13 lays out the legitimate functions of government. Anything else maybe isn't legitimate government.
Paul lays it out this way:
First (13:1) Paul states that every person is to be subject to the governing authorities, because God is the sovereign who ordains all human governments. Then (13:2) he draws the implication: If you resist government authority, which God has established, you are opposing God Himself and youll come under judgment. Then (13:3-4) Paul explains that the purpose of civil government is to protect law-abiding citizens and punish law-breakers. As such, the government is acting as a minister of God in avenging wrong. Thus (13:5) there are two reasons to be in subjection to the government: Fear of punishment and conscience before God, who has ordained the government. Finally (13:6-7), Paul applies it by showing why we should pay taxes, namely, because government officials are servants of God. Thus they deserve our taxes as well as our respect.
Nowhere do I find where Paul said one could pick and choose which laws they want to follow or disobey, with one exception. He did say that you could resist government authority and the law could be disobeyed if they did not follow Gods law. Am I right on wrong on this?
Paul doesnt go into specifics and what he does not say, and I think we all believe is that if the government officials who are servants of God screw things up, then they should be removed from office. I fully expect that removal will start from the top down under Trump. GO TRUMP!!!
Does Romans 13 say that YOU can decide which government and what laws are legitimate?
Deckard has made it abundantly clear that only a Paultard is capable of deciding that.
Of course we can count on you to join with Gatlin and happily turn in all of your firearms when a law is passed making them illegal and also turning in those "lawbreakers" who do not willingly submit to the state and turn in their own firearms.
The "law is the law", right?
See - that's your problem, you and Gatlin.
You do not know the difference between a moral and an immoral law.
Truth is treason in the empire of lies. - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Nowhere do I find where Paul said one could pick and choose which laws they want to follow or disobey, with one exception. He did say that you could resist government authority and the law could be disobeyed if they did not follow Gods law. Am I right on wrong on this?
I have already addressed this in a couple of posts, which you cowardly ran away from.
A number of Christian leaders say that Christians must obey the government no matter what.
For example, Robert Deffinbaugh pastor at Community Bible Chapel in Richardson, Texas says:
Whether the government be totalitarian or democratic, the Christians obligation to submit to it is the same.
This is not an unrealistic or abstract concept. After all, most churches in Nazi-era Germany supported the Nazis. The German clergy used the same rationale to support Hitler that many American churches are using today to demand obedience to authority Romans 13:1-7
*****
Your urging Christians to lay down like sheep and obey government "no matter what" is blasphemous.
The Bible Urges Us to CHALLENGE Not Obey Bad Government
In reality, Christian (and Jewish) leaders throughout history have explained that we must disobeytyrannical governments.
The Book of Maccabees an ancient Jewish book purporting to document the events which Chanukah celebrates apparently says:
Gordan Runyan pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church points out numerous instances in the Bible of men and women who disobeyed their government rulers, and were rewarded by God and praised as holy.
Did John the Baptist violate Gods principle of submission to authority when he publicly scolded King Herod for his infidelity? Did Simon Peter and the other Apostles violate Gods principle of submission to authority when they refused to stop preaching on the streets of Jerusalem?
Did Paul violate Gods principle of submission to authority when he refused to obey those authorities who demanded that he abandon his missionary work? In fact, Paul spent almost as much time in jail as he did out of jail.
Remember that every apostle of Christ (except John) was killed by hostile civil authorities opposed to their endeavors. Christians throughout church history were imprisoned, tortured, or killed by civil authorities of all stripes for refusing to submit to their various laws and prohibitions. Did all of these Christian martyrs violate Gods principle of submission to authority?
So, even the great prophets, apostles, and writers of the Bible (including the writer of Romans Chapter 13) understood that human authority even civil authority is limited.
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.