International News
See other International News Articles
Title: The EU's “Suicide by Reality Denial”
Source:
The Unz Review
URL Source: http://www.unz.com/tsaker/the-eus-suicide-by-reality-denial/
Published: Apr 7, 2016
Author: The Saker
Post Date: 2016-04-15 17:33:32 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 1220
Comments: 10
What had to happen did happen. The EU, being the chain of weak links it is, did eventually give in, and the Dutch people were the first one to vote against the association with the Ukraine. Of course, the Euroburocrats can now find some reason to declare the vote invalid, they can declare that some law was violated, they can even negotiate some minor change the to association agreement, or they might even decide that they can simply ignore this vote. But none of that will make any difference: the undeniable truth is that the Ukrainians are not welcome in the EU, not as associates and even less so as members. So no EU, no NATO no “European future” for the Ukraine. The entire hot air balloon which has been fueling the naïve and ugly hopes of the Euromaidan has burst and the Euro-Ukrainian project is crash and burning like the Hindenburg. This disaster did not have to happen, it was entirely man made. In a saner world, the EU, Russia and the Ukraine could have negotiated a tripartite deal which would have given the Ukraine the role which geography and history have given it: to be a bridge between Russia and the EU. But the EU categorically rejected this option, several times, simply declaring that “the Ukraine is a sovereign state and Russia has no say in Ukrainian matters”. This zero sum game was forced on Russia against her will but now it is the EU which has lost it all, even if this is by no a victory for Russia either. The sad reality is that everybody has lost. Now the EU has to accept the total defeat of its Ukrainian policy, Russia is now alone looking at a dying failed state right across her border, while the Ukraine is simply falling apart and dying a painful death. Will the Eurobureaucrats accept this outcome? Probably not. They will do what they have always done. They will lie, deny, minimize and, most importantly, pretend like nothing has happened. They will say that 60% of 30% of a small EU nation do not get to make decisions for the entire continent. Or they will declare that instead of just an old fashioned “association” the EU will offer the Ukraine something much better – a “heartfelt friendship” maybe. Or a “love eternal”. Or even a “continental brotherhood”. But that will all be in vain because the people of Europe are clearly weary of the Ukronazis, even their Polish “friends” are now considering building a wall of their own, to keep their “Ukrainian friends” out of Poland; feel the love! Consequence one: financial costs But it is way too late for the Europeans. The really bad news for them is that they will have to pay most of the costs of more or less rebuilding the Ukraine. Russia simply cannot do it. Her economy is way too small, and she is already struggling with trying to restore law and order in Crimea (which is proving very hard, as the local mob is already trying to return the way it operated under Ukrainian control). Furthermore, Russia will have to pay for the Donbass, that is pretty obvious. So Russia is really maxed out. The US could pay, but won’t. Even if Hillary is elected (aka appointed by the US ‘deeps state’), such a huge economic rescue program for the Ukraine will never pass Congress, not when the US themselves are in need of a similar program to rebuilt their own decrepit and neglected infrastructure and economy. But most importantly, Russia does have the means to close her borders. The newly created Russian National Guard will now take over the responsibilities of several ministries and agencies including the Federal Migration Service. Russia already has a very capable Border Guard Service which is subordinated to the Federal Security Service (ex-KGB). It is estimated that the Border Guard Service currently includes 10 regional offices, 80+ border units, 950+ outposts, 400+ checkpoints. Every day the service conducts 11,000 patrols. In total, the task of preservation and protection of borders of the Russian Federation carried out by about 200’000 border guards. This service has its own air force, coastal navy, UAV, intelligence directorate, armored units and even its own Spetsnaz forces. The reality is that the Russian Border Guard Service is more powerful than most EU armies. And now it will have the full power of the National Guard to back it. Make no mistake, Russia can, and will, if needed, lock and protect her borders. As for the USA, they have the best border protection on the planet: the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. So when the Ukraine turns into a black hole (the process is well under way) the only ones who will not be able to protect themselves but who will have the means to pay to fix this mess will be the Europeans. Yes, sure, the US and Russia will also have to help, and they both will, for different reasons. But the bulk of the costs will go directly to the European taxpayer. That is the price the EU will have to pay, sooner or later, for its arrogance and incompetence. Second Consequence: security There will also be another price to pay, this time a price in security. All the NATO sabre-rattling along the Russian border did, eventually, wake up the “Russian bear”. Not only has Russia now deployed her formidable Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad, she has now doubled the size of her already f ormidable Airborne Forces. Here is what I wrote about that in December 2014: “the Russians have no fear of the military threat posed by NATO. Their reaction to the latest NATO moves (new bases and personnel in Central Europe, more spending, etc.) is to denounce it as provocative, but Russian officials all insist that Russia can handle the military threat. As one Russian deputy said “5 rapid reaction diversionary groups is a problem we can solve with one missile”. A simplistic but basically correct formula. As I mentioned before, the decision to double the size of the Russian Airborne Forces and to upgrade the elite 45th Special Designation Airborne Regiment to full brigade-size has already been taken anyway. You could say that Russia preempted the creation of the 10’000 strong NATO force by bringing her own mobile (airborne) forces from 36’000 to 72’000 . This is typical Putin. While NATO announces with fanfare and fireworks that NATO will create a special rapid reaction “spearhead” force of 10’000, Putin quietly doubles the size of the Russian Airborne Forces to 72’000. And, believe me, the battle hardened Russian Airborne Forces are a vastly more capable fighting force then the hedonistic and demotivated multi-national (28 countries) Euroforce of 5’000 NATO is struggling hard to put together . The US commanders fully understand that”. But that is not all Russia did. Putin has ordered the re-creation of the ultimate Cold War Russian armor threat: the First Guards Tank Army. This Tank Army will include two Tank Division (the best ones in the Russian military – 2nd Guards Tamanskaya Motor Rifle Division and the 4th Guards Kantemirovskaya Tank Division), and a total of 500+ T-14 Armata tanks. This Tank Army will be supported by the 20th Guards Combined Arms Army. Make no mistake, this is a huge, heavy and powerful force whose purpose will be very similar to the famous Soviet “Shock” Armies during WWII and the Cold War: “overcome difficult defensive dispositions in order to create a tactical penetration of sufficient breadth and depth to permit the commitment of mobile formations for deeper exploitation”. Bravo Europe – you just painted a giant crosshair on your forehead! Very little of that is reported in the western media, of course, and so the general public is utterly unaware of the fact that while NATO and western politicians pretended to play tough and tried to scare Russia, the Russians decided to take these threats seriously and took real, practical action. For somebody like me who lived through the Cold War and who used to monitor the Soviet Forces in Eastern Germany, it is both distressing and sickening to see that the West has literally forced Russia into a new Cold War she neither wanted nor needed. Of course, I am absolutely confident that there is no “Russian threat” in East, and the only way to get this entire military power to strike would be to attack it first, but the sad reality is that the EU/NATO countries are now directly targeted by Russian forces. To make it all much worse, there is now a strong possibility that Hillary and her Neocon gang will soon take over the White House. God only knows what these people are capable off. Hillary, whose only “success” in life seems to have push Bill to bomb the Serbs and making a ugly mess out of Libya, will have something to prove: that she is more of a man than Putin. She will try to scare and bully him into some kind of submission and nevermind that the Russian people now see the West as a degenerate, if arrogant, society of Conchita Wurst like poseurs who simply don’t have what it take to fight a real fight and who can only pick on the weak and humble. It is not fear which the Neocons inspire in Russians, but disgust. At most, they can elicit a sense of concern due to their seemingly infinite arrogance and self- defeating lack of foresight. As I have written many, many times already, Russian do fear war, no doubt about it, but, unlike the AngloZionists, they are nevertheless ready for it. As for the Europeans, they are now slowly coming to realize that they are in for a long and very painful war against Wahabi terrorism. The attacks in Paris and Brussels are just the opening shots of a war which will last many years. It took Russia over a decade to finally crush the Wahabi terrorists in the Caucasus, and that was with a man like Vladimir Putin at the helm of the country. One look at Francois Hollande or Angela Merkel and you can feel in your guts that these two sad clowns will never prevail. Just contrast the reaction of Vladimir Putin to the downing of the Russian airliner over the Sinai with Frederica Mogherini’s sobbing following the bombings in Brussels. Now imagine that you are a Wahabi terrorist leader, and a hardcore lifelong sexist, would I add, and that you are looking at these two photos on the right. Would this influence your selection of targets? Of course it would. The same goes for the comparison of the US/NATO operations in Syria with the outcome of just under six months of Russian Aerospace forces. States, just like people, have their own “body language” and while the body language displayed by Russia is one of confident and formidable power, the body language of the EU and, to a marginally lesser extend, the USA is one of weakness, hubris and incompetence, often bordering on the suicidal (like Merkel’s policy towards immigration). The Bottom Line The bottom line of this mess is this: what the US and the EU did in the Ukraine (and elsewhere, really) was fantastically stupid. But the US can afford such mistakes, while the EU clearly cannot. As for Russia, yes, she most definitely has been hurt by these policies, but this pain has been channeled by the Kremlin to make Russia stronger on many levels, from the political, to the military and even the economy, although here the progress has been minimal and the 5th column is still very much in charge, though I remain hopeful of a much needed purge. What the EU has done is essentially a form of “suicide by reality denial”. What follows next will have to be regime change, not for one country, but for the entire continent. I think that such regime change is inevitable, but the big question is how long this slow and painful EU agony will last. Alas, this could take many years, I think. EU leaders will not elegantly apologize and resign, there is an entire class of parasites which now lives from the EU structure which will desperately resist any meaningful reforms, nevermind regime change, and which will always put their narrow comprador class interests above their people or even common sense. As for the people of the EU, they will find out that they don’t have the means to impose political change by the ballot, that they live in a pretend- democracy, and that everything they have been told and promised is just an empty, ugly, lie. The Ukraine did not become Europe, but Europe became the Ukraine. Welcome to the real word, EU! 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
A little too much Russian cheerleading for my tastes, but true in all of the essentials. We screwed the pooch in the Ukraine. Badly. Hillary is part of the team that did it. Trump is our only shot on offer who gets it that we need to give the Russians strategic space, that Russia and we have a common enemy, and that there is not one reason on God's green earth why we need to be antagonizing them. Russia is not a threat to the United States or the free world. Going BANKRUPT by creating a new, pointless, Cold War with a Russia that isn't a threat - THAT is a REAL threat, a self-imposed one. What we've done is stupid. Trump's solution: make peace with the Russians and make joint security deals is absolutely spot on. Paradoxically, even the Ukraine will benefit by being "abandoned" by Europe, because the EU is all hat and no cattle there, and the US is simply a force provocatrice, that prevents any sort of settlement. Perpetual limbo in borderland hell with a low grade civil war fever is the worst outcome for Ukraine. Things will start to mend there when we get it over with, lose, get out, and let stability return. We're no more going to succeed in controlling the Ukraine than the Soviets were ever going to be permitted to control Grenada or Nicaragua: too close, too important, too dangerous to Russian (or American in the Caribbean) national security to allow it. We have enough reasonable strategic thinkers to know that. So let's get Trump in there, use common sense, and nip this neo-Cold War in the bud. It's expensive. It's worthless. It's pointless. And it is very, very stupid.
Good post. And history since 1991 has shown how useless NATO is. The GOPe types like to point to the NATO AWACS that helped patrol our airspace after 9-11 as proof that we draw some sort of benefit from NATO. And that is rubbish, we paid for a 3rd of the NATO AWACS fleet, and we could have had an awesome air defense for our own nation with a fraction of the wealth diverted to the defense of NATO. And it was a waste from the beginning anyway, we were only there as a trip wire. We would have been bankrupted has we attempted to match Stalin division for division 65 years ago. The money poured into NATO at the time would have been far better spent on Spaatz's 250 combat groups proposal. Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria
During the Cold War, if the Soviets crossed the line, we would have nuked the Soviet Union. They would have nuked us in retaliation. Everybody dies. And that's STILL true. We have nukes. They have nukes. France has nukes. The UK has nukes. So therefore, nobody will be invading any of those countries, ever. Because no invader can win. It's mutual suicide. Therefore, there will be no war. Once that is firmly understood, we and the Russians can both agree to stop wasting money on conventional forces to face off against each other when we know that those forces can never, ever be used. Instead, invest in infrastructure, and in practical forces to face the real non-nuclear problems of the world. Europe is a sanctuary: nobody can build an empire there. So let's stop making ourselves poor PRETENDING there is a threat. From 1945 until today, if the Russians invaded Western Eurppe, we'd nuke them, and they'd nuke us. All dead. Hottentots rule. And from 1949 until today, if we invaded Russia, they'd nuke us, we'd nuke them. All dead. Hottentots rule. Conventional forces in Europe are a waste of money. The Europeans are right to spend nothing.,,well, as long as they can depend on the Americans, the French and the British.
Yes indeed. Let's leave the nukes to Iran, North Korea and ISIS. Let them waste their money. Yeah. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
Yes indeed. Let's leave the nukes to Iran, North Korea and ISIS. Conventional forces are non-nuclear forces. Seems like Vicomte13 wants to take a new look at the New Look. A good idea then, a good idea now. Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria
What are you talking about?
It's a good idea for the U.S. and Russia to throw away there nuclear arsenal and leave the field to Iran, N. Korea and ISIS? Oh, let's not forget about China. Oh, then there's Pakistan. Good idea? Really? потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
What are you talking about? LOL! Reading comprehension is not his strong suit. Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria
So you think the New Look was about getting rid of nuclear weapons? Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria
No. The US and Russia should keep their nuclear weapons - they keep the peace. The US should draw down its CONVENTIONAL forces. France and Britain are nuclear safeguards for European security. The same thing should become true in Asia: Japan, the Philippines, South Korea and Taiwan should nuke up to protect their own security, and stop the Chinese in their tracks in the South China Sea. WE should not be entering into THEIR territorial disputes.
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
So let's get Trump in there, use common sense, and nip this neo-Cold War in the bud. It's expensive. It's worthless. It's pointless. And it is very, very stupid.
#3. To: nativist nationalist (#2)
#4. To: Vicomte13, nativist nationalist, All (#3)
Once that is firmly understood, we and the Russians can both agree to stop wasting money on conventional forces to face off against each other when we know that those forces can never, ever be used.
#5. To: SOSO, Vicomte13 (#4)
...we and the Russians can both agree to stop wasting money on conventional forces...
#6. To: SOSO (#4)
Yes indeed. Let's leave the nukes to Iran, North Korea and ISIS. Let them waste their money. Yeah.
#7. To: nativist nationalist, vicomte13 (#5)
Conventional forces are non-nuclear forces. Seems like Vicomte13 wants to take a new look at the New Look. A good idea then, a good idea now.
#8. To: Vicomte13 (#6)
Yes indeed. Let's leave the nukes to Iran, North Korea and ISIS. Let them waste their money. Yeah.
#9. To: SOSO (#7)
It's a good idea for the U.S. and Russia to throw away there [sic] nuclear arsenal and leave the field to Iran, N. Korea and ISIS? Oh, let's not forget about China. Oh, then there's Pakistan. Good idea? Really?
#10. To: SOSO (#7)
t's a good idea for the U.S. and Russia to throw away there nuclear arsenal and leave the field to Iran, N. Korea and ISIS? Oh, let's not forget about China. Oh, then there's Pakistan. Good idea? Really?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]