politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: We finally know who Drudge is for
Source:
DrudgeReport, current headline
URL Source: http://drudgereport.com/
Published: Apr 10, 2016
Author: Matt Drudge
Post Date: 2016-04-10 17:20:06 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 12205
Comments: 55
Poster Comment: I can't recall Drudge ever taking sides quite like this in a primary or an election. The bias has been pretty evident for some time but Drudge may as well slap a Trump 2016 logo on his website. Of course, the Bloomberg article he points to makes no such editorial opinion. 
NO PRIMARY, NO CAUCUS: CRUZ GETS ALL DELEGATES
VOTERS NOT NEEDED
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
#3. To: TooConservative (#0)
People like this man showed up to be delegates, but for some odd reason if they were known to be Trump supporters the officials proclaimed that they were not registered Republicans, even when they had been so for decades. It's the "Christian Cruz" way. Win with crooked legalistic tricks when you cannot convince people to vote for you.
He got into a fight with the district chairperson over something and got replaced as a district delegate. So he showed up anyway and of course they didn't let him in because he was not on the district delegate list. So he went home mad. A little later, he posted a video of himself burning his GOP party card. (I posted it here.) Like anyone but a total weirdo even has a party identification card. LOL Given his behavior, I think there was probably good reason to remove him. He seems past his best-by date. So I think it's time for this old duffer to be content with staying home and yelling at clouds from his front porch. If you are spatting with your district or county chairman over something, you are not going to be invited to the convention. That's how it is. I'm wondering if we'll find out what he did to get thrown off the delegation and replaced. But this is all sour grapes.
That's a good portrait of Angry Old Trump Guy. Have you ever noticed that every time Cruz beats Trump like a rug, especially when he did it just by showing up and giving some speeches or not skipping the Iowa debate (which Trump did over Megyn Kelly spurting her blood at him or something), Trump or his minions all start screaming that Cruz was cheating. "It's just not fair that that Lyin' Ted is winning delegates to the convention at the district/county/CD/state conventions just like every other national GOP candidate has done for well over a century. He's cheatin'!" Every. Time. Because, apparently, Trump simply cannot lose. He can be cheated of victory but no one can ever beat him. Oh, no. Because he's a total winner. And his creepy cult followers just gobble up this nonsense and sour grapes like a bunch of Scientology freaks. Looking at Angry Old Guy's YouBoob channel, I see he was uploading a video that alleged the Ron Paul delegates were stolen from him at the 2012 convention. Now, whether that is true or not is immaterial (it probably was). However, if you're posting that kind of stuff on YouBoob and talking about it to people, you are never going to get on the delegate list for the convention, which is a very hot ticket in party activist circles in every state this year.
Whoever gets the most votes should get the most delegates. Unless you don't believe in a representative Republic. Which you obviously don't with your hard on for Cruz. You're like a Soviet.
Not true at all. The GOP is a collection of 50+ state parties. It is always possible in every state for the winner to collect less than a majority because every state/territory has at least three delegates who are state party honchos, like the state chairman. So if you have a state where Trump wins 20 delegates and Cruz wins 19, Cruz can still walk away with 22 delegates because he got the support of the 3 state party honchos, maybe because Cruz actually visited the state, gave speeches, built up some grassroots organization, helped them raise funds for state GOP candidates, etc. Trump doesn't seem to understand this at all. He thinks campaigning is flying around and giving speeches where he bloviates about his polls and building walls that he'll force some other country to pay for. Why should they pay for it? Well, because. And to pay for that wall, he wants to steal the money of legal residents of America, many of them citizens, who send money back home to Mexico to support aging parents or grandparents who still live there. Anyway, it isn't the GOP's fault if Trump refuses to learn the rules and play by them. It's Trump's fault. He's just too damned cheap and lazy to build up his campaign organization out in the states. It's not even that it would cost that much since Trump has plenty of people willing to volunteer, run campaign offices, man phone banks, etc. As I've said before, Trump is entirely to blame for this situation. Not his supporters, not the GOP. Trump is to blame. And the GOP is not just a platform for some blowhard billionaire to seek office with. If you want the GOP nomination, you play by GOP rules. And you don't threaten riots like some bunch of thuggish SJWs if you don't get your way after you refuse to do your homework and build a credible national campaign organization.
Here is what you don't understand geezer. You're an asshole. I don't care what you think. In fact if the nomination is stolen from Trump. You will be one of the first people I ban. It will be a different site then and establishment pricks such as yourself will not be welcome.
I think you've banned plenty of people over the years. So I can't be all that special after all.
Read the mission statement: he says that he doesn't ban people for expressing POLITICAL viewpoints, and that's what I do. So I don't get banned or even threatened with it. Do the guys who get banned do that? Or do they engage in flame wars and dishonesty? The site header says: "This site was built upon the idea of free speech so everyone is welcome to come and discuss and debate the issues on hand." That's truth in advertising right there. I'm still here, aren't I? I think you don't get banned here for having an opinion. I think to get banned you have to actually BE obnoxious - and that's a different thing. Example: If Bernie Sanders posted here, I think Stone would yell at him a lot for being a doofus, but Sanders would never get banned.
Good Lord, do I have to explain to you why popular speech needs no protection? We have the First Amendment to protect controversial and, yes, obnoxious speech. The classic example is the right of Nazis to march through a neighborhood of Holocaust survivors in Skokie, IL. (BTW, that march never did happen but they did have the right to march there after a court case).
#46. To: TooConservative (#44)
Of course! You need to explain EVERYTHING to me, in great detail. And because I'm thick (you said so) please remember to TYPE SLOWLY when you do - otherwise I might not understand. So there are not many of us? I'm not reaching tens of thousands of minds with my scintillating prose? Well, that's just terrible. I guess that makes us we few...we happy few...we band of brothers...
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: Orthodoxa (#3)
People like this man showed up to be delegates, but for some odd reason if they were known to be Trump supporters the officials proclaimed that they were not registered Republicans, even when they had been so for decades.
#9. To: TooConservative (#6)
yelling at clouds
#15. To: ConservingFreedom, Orthodoxa (#9)
(Edited)
#23. To: TooConservative (#15)
Have you ever noticed that every time Cruz beats Trump like a rug,
#25. To: A K A Stone (#23)
Whoever gets the most votes should get the most delegates. Unless you don't believe in a representative Republic. Which you obviously don't with your hard on for Cruz. You're like a Soviet.
#35. To: TooConservative (#25)
Trump doesn't seem to understand this at all.
#37. To: A K A Stone (#35)
You will be one of the first people I ban.
#42. To: TooConservative (#37)
I think you've banned plenty of people over the years.
#44. To: Vicomte13 (#42)
I think you don't get banned here for having an opinion. I think to get banned you have to actually BE obnoxious - and that's a different thing.
Replies to Comment # 44. Good Lord, do I have to explain to you why popular speech needs no protection?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]