politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: John Kasich: The Candidate Who Wouldn’t Leave
Source:
NRO
URL Source: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic ... an-candidate-who-wouldnt-leave
Published: Apr 6, 2016
Author: Jonah Goldberg
Post Date: 2016-04-06 20:56:03 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 10153
Comments: 85
Then came Lee’s creepy voiceover: “It came without warning! They were just being Polite! They didn’t realize that they’d be stuck with . . . The Thing That Wouldn’t Leave”! John Kasich is this election season’s The Thing That Wouldn’t Leave. After investing everything in New Hampshire, Kasich came in second, doing worse than Jon Huntsman had in his race-ending performance in 2012. Kasich’s response? He didn’t just declare victory, he proclaimed, “Tonight, the light overcame the darkness.” Since then, Kasich has lost some 30 contests and won one — in his home state of Ohio. But still, he just won’t go. It’s not just that Kasich can’t take a hint, it’s that he appears to be living in a kind of fantasy world, largely defined by three myths or delusions. The first is the most endearing. Kasich has the best résumé of the remaining candidates. Heck, he arguably had the best résumé of the entire 2016 field, if by “best” you mean the longest and deepest government experience. He’s not delusional about that. What he is confused about is the idea that a lot of people care that he was, say, the chairman of the House Budget Committee two decades ago. According to legend, a supporter once shouted at Adlai Stevenson, “Governor Stevenson, all thinking people are for you!” Stevenson shot back, “That’s not enough. I need a majority!” Even if Kasich is right that his résumé makes him the best qualified to be president — a debatable proposition — the simple fact is that after nearly three dozen contests, relatively few voters agree with him. Ah, but what about the delegates? If it’s a contested convention and neither Donald Trump nor Ted Cruz has enough delegates to lock up the nomination, won’t they turn to Kasich? Not necessarily. But don’t tell that to the Ohio governor, who goes from interview to interview insisting that he’d be the natural choice for the convention. Why would he be? Well, that answer varies. Kasich’s most frequently stated reason is that delegates will choose him because he beats Hillary Clinton in the polls. And it’s true that Kasich does marginally better than Cruz in hypothetical matchups against Clinton — and a lot better than Trump. Left unanswered is why the delegates — many of them loyal to Trump and Cruz — would gamely back The Thing That Wouldn’t Leave. After the second or third round of voting, delegates are free to cast their ballots for whomever they want. There’s little evidence that they’d want Kasich, and they’d be under no obligation to vote for him over, say, Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio — or, for that matter, Rush Limbaugh or Shaquille O’Neal. Indeed, for many delegates, it would seem either unfair or downright crazy to skip over bigger vote-getters and back Kasich just because he won his home state of Ohio. Of course, what that leaves out is the fact that Kasich is running as a hopeful, positive, uplifting champion of light over darkness. That brings us to yet another Kasich delusion, and this one is shared by many of his backers as well. Call it the myth of Kasich the hugger. In South Carolina, a college student asked the Ohio governor for one of his supposedly famous hugs. It wasn’t until later that we learned the huggee worked for the hugger’s super PAC. More to the point, Kasich is simply not the touchy-feely guy he’s pretending to be or that he perhaps thinks he is. The man is famously irascible, pugnacious, and sanctimonious. He’s prone to defending his policies, such as his expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare in Ohio, by insinuating that he cares more about his eternal soul than his critics. A lot of people talk about how unlikeable Cruz is. Well, I’ve met both men, and I’d much rather have a beer with Cruz. Maybe Kasich’s denial stems from the fact that he has never lost a race and can’t contemplate failing this time. I really have no idea. All I know is that it’s time for him to go. There was an old Saturday Night Live fake movie trailer narrated by horror-movie veteran Christopher Lee. John Belushi played a houseguest who couldn’t take a hint from a couple who just wanted to go to bed. The husband tells Belushi, “Look, I don’t want to be rude, but my wife is Very tired!” Belushi responds by picking up the TV Guide and saying dismissively, “Yeah. . . . Hey, there’s a good movie on tonight! I think I’ll call up some friends and watch it over here!”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
#1. To: TooConservative (#0)
After Bernie, he's my man. Mailman's son and all.
You filthy socialist. I'm gonna laugh as he loses any hope for a presidential win... and then realizes he's too old to breathe long enough for another run. lol The best part of a liberal is that eventual one foot in the grave when it arrives. By the way, how old are you, you I love Lucy watching dinosaur? lol
Kasich does well in polls against Hillary. But you want a President Xlinton #45, so you're backing the least electable candidate.... Trump the loser. If Fred could post he'd tell you that you're a F'n retard! Stone, please free Fred Mertz so that he can respond to GI and your posts.
Nobody was even talking to you, liberal. Typical liberal, you think everything is about you. Mind your own business, and continue on with your 100% never saying anything bad about a (D).
Go back to your Trump pumpin', creep.
I can't get over how incredibly tiny his hands are.
Comment Removed Inappropriate
I can't stand Kasich. I never get why you make up such bizarre lies about people who disagree with you. I've probably never made a single nice post about Kasich here yet you just make this nonsense up. So does doing that on a regular basis tend to discredit me (as you intend) or are you just discrediting yourself (unintentionally)?
I don't believe you. I think you would vote for Kasich.
I'd say "maybe", unlike Trump which is "never". Kasich is a flake but he did have a strong record as a fiscal conservative in the House leadership, whatever his other shortcomings (which are many). But then, I'm in a solid Red state presidentially and congressionally. So I can be more-conservative-than-thou without worrying about the consequences of not voting or voting third-party.
#22. To: TooConservative (#20)
You're not really that conservative.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: Fred Mertz (#1)
After Bernie
#9. To: GrandIsland, Ready for Hillary, Loser Drumpf, Fred Mertz, A K A Stone (#6)
You filthy socialist.
#10. To: hondo68 (#9)
#12. To: GrandIsland, Trump Pumpin' (#10)
#14. To: hondo68, redleghunter (#12)
#15. To: TooConservative (#14)
#16. To: A K A Stone (#15)
#19. To: TooConservative (#16)
I can't stand Kasich
#20. To: A K A Stone (#19)
I think you would vote for Kasich.
Replies to Comment # 20. So I can be more-conservative-than-thou
End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]