[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
U.S. Constitution Title: COMPARING NAZI AND U.S. GUN LAWS COMPARING NAZI AND U.S. GUN LAWS Alan Bock Orange County Register Columnist A call from the PLO to disarm all the Jewish settlers in the West Bank region, in the wake of the despicable massacre of Arabs in a mosque and subsequent unrest, got me thinking about a book I've been reading. It's most unlikely that the Israeli government would carry out the PLO's wishes, of course. But we've heard calls to disarm Jews before. The last time Jews were effectively disarmed by law was when the Nazis passed their Weapons Law in 1938, which specifically stated that no Jew could own firearms or be involved in any business involving firearms, from manufacturing to retailing. Aaron Zelman and Jaw Simkin of Jews for the Preservation of FIrearms Ownership, in a provocative but persuasive book, argue that the Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 provided a direct model for the 1968 Gun Control Act in the United States. They make the case in "Gun Control: Gateway to Tyranny," published by JPFO. The Nazi law built on previous gun-control laws passed during the Weimar period. The 1938 law tightened up previous laws and (of course) made sure Jews couldn't have weapons or have anything to do with them. It was passed to protect the Nazi regime, which had been elected with a plurality (i.e., a minority) and faced widespread opposition within the populace. It required a license to own almost all kinds of weapons, except for certain government officials and Nazi Party functionaries and members. The 1968 Gun Control Act also exempts government entities from the controls that apply to law-abiding citizens. It also uses federal control of interstate commerce to convert what the U.S. Constitution calls a "right" into a government-granted privilege- -even as the Nazis did. There's another curiosity. THe 1928 Weimar weapons law created the category of "hunting weapons" and treated such weapons differently from other weapons. So far as Jay Simkin, who's researched the subject extensively, know, this is the first time that category appears in any country's weapon-control laws (of which there were almost none in the world before 1920). In the 1968 Gun Control Act the term "sporting purpose" is introduced, making its first appearance in any federal law or court decision. While "sporting purpose" is nowhere defined, the secretary of the Treasury is authorized to use this vague concept to decide which weapons can or cannot be owned by private persons. All this might be coincidence, of course. If you want to control people's access to weapons, which is what gun control is all about, there are certain provisions you'll include. What Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership did, after hearing people talk about apparent parallels between the Nazi law and the 1968 U.S. law, was to get original copies of the Nazi- era and prior laws and have them translated. Then they placed the provisions of the 1938 Nazi Weapons Act side by side against provisions of the 1968 Gun Control Act. The parallels are downright eerie. The U.S. version tends to be wordier and more bureaucratic-sounding than the Nazi version. But the powers granted to authorities and the requirements placed on people who want to own firearms track very closely. Particularly dramatic are the various forms prescribed for firearms dealers and government agencies. Not all laws include examples of the forms they want used. The Nazi law dos. So does the U.S. law. Is there a more tangible connection? The JPFO researchers looked at the representatives and senators who had been most active in promoting gun control in the 1960s, seeking a German connection. They found that the late Sen. Thomas Dodd, D-Conn., had been a senior member of the U.S. team that prosecuted Nazi war criminals during the Nuremberg trials. He lived in Germany, and his official duties required him to look at Nazi records and Nazi laws. Then another researcher pointed them to the published record of the hearings held before the 1968 law was passed. And there was a letter to Senator Dodd from the law librarian of the library of Congress, dated a few months before the 1968 law was passed: "Your request of July 2, 1968...for the translation of several German laws has been referred to the Law Library for attention. "In compliance with your request...we are enclosing herewith a translation of the Law on Weapons of March 18, 1938...as well as the Xerox copy of the original German text which you supplied." So Dodd had his own copy of the Nazi law and asked the Library of Congress to translate it for him during the time the 1968 law was being drafted. Where and when did he get it? Did he really use it as a model for the U.S. law? His family controls his papers. THey haven't responded to requests to do research among them. However it happened, we have a Nazi-style, Nazi-inspired law on the books. JPFO wants a full-scale congressional investigation into how this happened, if not outright repeal, before we even think about any more "gun control." It's a good point.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|