Bush Wars
See other Bush Wars Articles
Title: Ron Paul: I couldn’t support Donald Trump as nominee (10X worse than Obama)
Source:
Washington Times
URL Source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news ... -support-donald-trump-nominee/
Published: Mar 18, 2016
Author: David Sherfinski
Post Date: 2016-03-18 22:32:54 by Hondo68
Ping List: *Bill of Rights-Constitution* Subscribe to *Bill of Rights-Constitution*
Keywords: None
Views: 17875
Comments: 50
Former Texas Rep. Ron Paul said Friday he couldn’t support GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump if Mr. Trump wins the party’s nomination, saying Mr. Trump’s views on the scope of executive authority could surpass those of President Obama. “No, I couldn’t do that,” Mr. Paul said on Fox Business Network when asked if he would support Mr. Trump, should the billionaire businessman win the GOP nomination. “He’s [the] opposite of a libertarian.” Mr. Paul, a three-time presidential candidate, said on foreign policy, Mr. Trump probably wouldn’t be that much different than former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democratic front-runner. “I think the die-hard neoconservatives would not be that extremely unhappy with Hillary,” Mr. Paul said. “Trump is going to be the most efficient [at] using the executive orders,” he said. “He’ll say this is the way it is, you know. Obama was pretty arrogant. If you don’t do it, [the] Congress, I’ll write an order. Well, I think Trump [will] be 10 times worse on writing orders because he’s used to doing this, and he brags about it.” “He wants to be the boss. I’m not looking for a boss. We want somebody that will allow us to be our own boss, is what I think we should be looking for,” Mr. Paul said. 
Former Texas Rep. Ron Paul, father of Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., speaks in Richmond, Va., in this Nov. 4, 2013, file photo. (AP Photo/Steve Helber, File)
Subscribe to *Bill of Rights-Constitution*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.
#11. To: hondo68 (#0)
Is Trump perfect? Hardly. But 10X worse than Obama? That is quite an exaggeration! Trump will reverse flooding the country with illegals, and muslims, and he will reverse course on the one sided trade deals that the USA takes it in the shorts. That is 100X BETTER THAN OBUNGHOLE !!
Ron Paul believes that Trump will be 10X worse when it comes to Executive Orders. Maybe he will. But that's only because of the precedent set by Obama. Where was Ron Paul when Obama signed an EO protecting 5 million illegals? The non-enforcement of federal drug laws? Obama's 23 "executive actions" on guns? Obama's EO to raise the minimum wage for federal contractors? The EO to close Gitmo? But he gets his panties in a wad because Trump might do the same.
And that precedent was set previously by Bush.
Did he issue some that bothered you? Or are you just going by raw numbers?
Look, I realize I'm dealing with the festering carbuncle of LF here, but I'll respond to your idiocy anyway. All of the shit Obama has done to destroy this country could not have taken place without the Bush administration setting the stage.
The stage was set by the U.S. Constitution in Article II, Section 1. Presidents always had the power of Executive Orders. I'm saying Obama abused that power -- not based on the total number of EOs, but based on their content. You brought up Bush. Fair enough. What did he pass by EO that was unconstitutional or so outrageous that you even mention it?
Good luck getting a straight answer.
There are no replies to Comment # 38. End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest" 10X worse than Obama "
#12. To: Stoner (#11)
#22. To: misterwhite (#12)
But that's only because of the precedent set by Obama.
#23. To: Deckard (#22)
"And that precedent was set previously by Bush."
#27. To: misterwhite (#23)
Did he issue some that bothered you?
#37. To: Deckard (#27)
"All of the shit Obama has done to destroy this country could not have taken place without the Bush administration setting the stage."
#38. To: misterwhite (#37)
What did he pass by EO that was unconstitutional or so outrageous that you even mention it?
Replies to Comment # 38.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]