The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles
Title: Suicide of the GOP — or Rebirth?
Source:
Patrick J. Buchanan - Official Website
URL Source: http://buchanan.org/blog/suicide-gop-rebirth-124971
Published: Mar 18, 2016
Author: Pat Buchanan
Post Date: 2016-03-18 03:06:32 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 1055
Comments: 5
“If his poll numbers hold, Trump will be there six months from now when the Sweet 16 is cut to the Final Four, and he will likely be in the finals.” My prediction, in July of 2015, looks pretty good right now. Herewith, a second prediction. Republican wailing over his prospective nomination aside, Donald Trump could beat Hillary Clinton like a drum in November. Indeed, only the fear that Trump can win explains the hysteria in this city. Here is The Washington Post of March 18: “As a moral question it is straightforward. The mission of any responsible Republican should be to block a Trump nomination and election.” The Orwellian headline over that editorial: “To defend our democracy, the GOP must aim for a brokered convention.” Beautiful. Defending democracy requires Republicans to cancel the democratic decision of the largest voter turnout of any primaries in American history. And this is now a moral imperative for Republicans. Like the Third World leaders it lectures, the Post celebrates democracy — so long as the voters get it right. Whatever one may think of the Donald, he has exposed not only how far out of touch our political elites are, but how insular is the audience that listens to our media elite. Understandably, Trump’s rivals were hesitant to take him on, seeing the number he did on “little Marco,” “low energy” Jeb and “Lyin’ Ted.” But the Big Media — the Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times — have been relentless and ruthless. Yet Trump’s strength with voters seemed to grow, pari passu, with the savagery of their attacks. As for National Review, The Weekly Standard and the accredited conservative columnists of the big op-ed pages, their hostility to Trump seems to rise, commensurate with Trump’s rising polls. As the Wizard of Oz was exposed as a little man behind a curtain with a big megaphone, our media establishment is unlikely ever again to be seen as formidable as it once was. And the GOP? Those Republicans who assert that a Trump nomination would be a moral stain, a scarlet letter, the death of the party, they are most likely describing what a Trump nomination would mean to their own ideologies and interests. Barry Goldwater lost 44 states in 1964, and the GOP fell to less than a third of Congress. “The Republican Party is dead,” wailed the Rockefeller wing. Actually, it wasn’t. Only the Rockefeller wing was dead. After the great Yellowstone fire in the summer of ’88, the spring of ’89 produced astonishing green growth everywhere. 1964 was the Yellowstone fire of the GOP, burning up a million acres of dead wood, preparing the path for party renewal. Renewal often follows rebellion. Republican strength today, on Capitol Hill and in state offices, is at levels unseen since Calvin Coolidge. Turnout in the GOP primaries has been running at levels unseen in American history, while turnout in the Democratic primaries is below what it was in the Obama-Clinton race of 2008. This opportunity for Republicans should be a cause for rejoicing, not all this weeping and gnashing of teeth. If the party in Cleveland can bring together the Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and John Kasich forces, the White House, Supreme Court and Congress are all within reach. Consider. Clinton was beaten by Bernie Sanders in Michigan, and pressed in Ohio and Illinois, on her support for NAFTA and the trade deals of the Clinton-Bush-Obama era that eviscerated American manufacturing and led to the loss of millions of factory jobs and the stagnation of wages. Sanders’ issues are Trump’s issues. A Trump campaign across the industrial Midwest, Pennsylvania and New Jersey featuring attacks on Hillary Clinton’s support for NAFTA, the WTO, MFN for China — and her backing of amnesty and citizenship for illegal immigrants, and for the Iraq and Libyan debacles — is a winning hand. Lately, 116 architects and subcontractors of the Bush I and II foreign policy took their own version of the Oxford Oath. They will not vote for, nor serve in a Trump administration. Talking heads are bobbing up on cable TV to declare that if Trump is nominee, they will not vote for him and may vote for Clinton. This is not unwelcome news. Let them go. Their departure testifies that Trump is offering something new and different from the foreign policy failures this crowd did so much to produce. The worst mistake Trump could make would be to tailor his winning positions on trade, immigration and intervention — to court such losers. While Trump should reach out to the defeated establishment of the party, he cannot compromise the issues that brought him where he is, or embrace the failed policies that establishment produced. This would be throwing away his aces. The Trump campaign is not a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. It is a rebellion of shareholders who are voting to throw out the corporate officers and board of directors that ran the company into the ground. Only the company here is our country.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
Good article. " Donald Trump could beat Hillary Clinton like a drum in November. " I think so too. All the claims to the contrary have been huge piles of BS! Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. There are no Carthaginian terrorists. President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. --Clint Eastwood "I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
Pat is full of crap. The only reason Trump is still in the running is because the media has been handling him like a rich uncle,whose will they want prominent mention in. Who OWNS the major media in this country? Does ANYONE out there thing the owners are conservatives that want to preserve our form of government? Or are they owned by globalist international financiers that dream of seeing the Republican Party lying in the ashes of history so they have no challenge to their rule? Who do YOU think Trump relates to the most,blue-collar hourly workers,or international bankers? The Trump campaign is not a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. That is EXACTLY what it is. Can you say "Stealth Dim"? BTW,the destruction of the alleged Republican Party in itself is not a bad thing. I have been looking forward to this happening ever since the election of Boy Jorge Bush. BUT.....,it needed to be destroyed from within by actual Republicans who were disgusted with the betrayal of the globalists,not from a globalist outsider coming in to destroy it from the outside. ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
The Party is Dead. Long live The Party. Press/Read Reset Button here----->>
They haven't begun to hit him hard yet . Trump has gotten more fee media and press than all the other candidates combined. Teddy Roosevelt led a liberal revolt against the Republicans in 1912 that split the party . Roosevelt was the celebrity of his time getting huge crowds wherever he went . The crowds liked the image of toughness. But the party thought that his policies were too extreme; so they nominated Howard Taft for a 2nd term. Roosevelt and Taft split the party vote making socialist Woodrow Wilson the President . I predict something similar will happen this cycle. "If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato
Yet Hillary has more votes in the primaries/caucuses to date than Trump, and not by a little. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
#2. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
(Edited)
Understandably, Trump’s rivals were hesitant to take him on, seeing the number he did on “little Marco,” “low energy” Jeb and “Lyin’ Ted.”
#3. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
#4. To: nativist nationalist, sneakypete, Stoner, TooConservative, redleghunter (#0)
But the Big Media — the Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Times — have been relentless and ruthless.
#5. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
Republican strength today, on Capitol Hill and in state offices, is at levels unseen since Calvin Coolidge. Turnout in the GOP primaries has been running at levels unseen in American history, while turnout in the Democratic primaries is below what it was in the Obama-Clinton race of 2008.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]