Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Bullies
Source:
ProgressiveArmy
URL Source: http://progressivearmy.com/2016/02/ ... ve-bullies/?platform=hootsuite
Published: Feb 21, 2016
Author: Michael Salamone
Post Date: 2016-02-21 09:40:58 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 3209
Comments: 8
Both Trump and Hillary are also getting a majority of their support from aging baby boomers as well. This week I took an informal panel from people in this age group that I know who are supporting either of these candidates, or were referred to me by friends or family members who knew I was seeking people in this age group who are supporting Trump or Hillary. My findings were that, at least in my sample group, supporters of both of these baby boomer candidates had a lot in common. At the end of the day, I was left with the impression that baby-boomers who support Trump or Hillary are pro-bullying, and I’m not just phrasing it that way because I’m prone towards the bombastic. I best disclaim that I am not a psychologist. I’m a regular guy who likes politics and talking to others about politics. The conversations I’m going to report to you are with other regular folks. Some I knew before hand, others not. While I did Google traits of bullies to shape how I presented this story to you, I didn’t cherry-pick my panel’s quotes to support my narrative. I spoke with 10 people, five in favor of each candidate. All of the responses are included, though if responses were similar, I combined them into the clearest response and indicated how many people said this sort of thing. I’m not such a dolt that I would claim these views represent entire voting blocks. I know baby boomers who think similarly as I do on these issues. I specifically sought out Trump and Hillary supporters in that age demographic. I don’t believe or present my findings as scientific in any manner. However, the human experience, no matter how individualized or intersected, does have commonplaces to be considered. I do not believe in the hive-mind. I believe in individuals. However, individuals often subscribe to a hive-mind in order to feel like part of a community. Supporting political candidates can have that effect. I know because I try to be careful of that trap myself. We’re all human. Some of us care about other humans more than others, though. Bullies feel entitled to claim power of the people they dominate, and to take their possessions as their own. Every single one of the ten Trump and Hillary supporters who spoke with me diminished Bernie supporters as “just wanting free stuff.” When I pushed back on that, asking if the citizenry doesn’t deserve to dictate the government services their tax dollars support, every single one of the Trump and Hillary supporters who spoke with me told me that they weren’t given healthcare or education, so future generations don’t deserve to get it either. “Nobody ever helped me,” was a common theme. I also found it quite interesting that both Trump and Hillary supporters assume that Bernie supporters will go with their candidate after the primary contests, yet nobody could give me an answer as to why they would automatically pick up this sizable voting block. The answer was always, “they will have to.” Hillary’s people felt that as Hillary would be the Democratic nominee, Bernie’s supporters would have to end up supporting her. Trump’s supporters believed that since Trump would then be the only anti-establishment candidate left, Bernie’s supporters would have to back the billionaire. Bullies don’t consider the feelings or beliefs of the people they seek to dominate. They only consider their own. I asked both groups if their candidate wasn’t exactly what Bernie and his supporters were standing up to, be it billionaires or center-right establishment candidates. The common theme in their replies was that it doesn’t matter, but here is what they said: “It’s her turn.” (x2) “They’re losers.” “They’re stupid hippies.” (x2) “They’re stupid hipsters.” “They’re stupid.” (x3) “Bunch of Communists.” These answers were fairly identical as those when I asked why these baby-boomers I spoke with thought an overwhelming majority of millennial voters were backing Sanders. “They don’t know how things work.” (x2) “They don’t understand reality.” “They’ll grow up after they lose.” (x2) “They’re stupid.” (x3) “They’re Communists.” “They’re losers.” 3. Lies Versus Critical Thinking Bullies lack the emotional and intellectual depth to think about things critically. They have a “me versus the world” point of view, which allows them to rationalize an “anything to win” strategy involving lies and violence to try to conquer those they seek to dominate. I confronted Hillary supporters with policy pivots Secretary Clinton has made throughout the primaries, as well as direct lie campaigning examples from either former President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, their daughter or their surrogates. I confronted Trump supporters with examples of how he avoids talking about policy and direct lie campaigning examples from Mr. Trump’s tweets and campaign materials. For example, a Hillary supporter may have been given something the Clinton campaign said to imply Bernie Sanders would scrap Obamacare, alongside the fact that it was a lie, or how Secretary Clinton has been on both sides of issues like Social Security and abortion rights throughout the campaign. Trump supporters were shown things like times Mr. Trump was asked for specific policy ideas and responded vaguely about how he’ll hire the best people or he will make America win again, as well as direct lies about his opponents, such as implying Governor Jeb Bush’s metaphor about mooning people meant that he was seeking to drop his pants in public. Here are the replies: “Anything goes in politics.” “It’s about winning.” “You have to fight dirty to win.” (x3) “You have to say what people want to hear.” (x2) “I vote for a person not their policies.” “Nobody will remember. It doesn’t matter.” “Voters are stupid. You have to play them.” Bullies use emotional domination to make their victims believe they are the only ones who care for them and that the victim’s survival or well-being is solely in the hands of the bully. When I asked the baby boomer Trump and Hillary supporters why they are supporting their candidate, I again noticed the lack of public policy concern. I was told: “It’s her turn.” (x2) “We need someone tough.” (x2) “She was right about Obama when she ran against him.” “He’s been Obama’s biggest critic.” “Somebody has to fight for America.” “She knows how to play the game.” “No more politicians.” “I pick winners.” The consideration of what is right and what is wrong escapes the bully, who cares only about getting their way. I presented Hillary supporters with the allegations against the Clinton Foundation for trading donations for arms deals while she was Secretary of State. To Trump supporters, I exhibited the fraud allegations surrounding Trump University, where he profited heavily from students who said they were ripped off. Again, the tone of responses were quite similar.” “That’s how you make money in America.” “People do all sorts of things to make money.” “I’m sure Bush and Cheney did it too.” “Business is business.” “I don’t see anything wrong with that.” (x5) 6. Bullies See Threats Where They Do Not Exist Research shows bullies are often acting aggressively towards others as a means of self-protection, and do not take into account if a real threat exists or not. Clinton supporters were given reading material on her foreign policy in Iraq, Libya and Syria outlining failures of intelligence and lives lost. Trump supporters were asked to read an essay on how many American troops it would take to round up illegal immigrants throughout the United States. “Only American lives matter.” (x4) “It has to be done.” (x2) “We have to protect our interests.” “You have to stand up to the bad guys.” “We have to be tough.” “We have to stop them.” Because of their lack of empathy, bullies are unable to create the sort of bonds necessary to share well with others. I ended all of my conversations with five of each Hillary and Trump supporters by presenting them with FDR’s Second New Deal, which I believe to be the eight tenants of Progressivism. It was FDR’s dream to have these passed as amendments to the Constitution, guaranteeing all Americans: the right to employment, high enough incomes to support food, clothing and leisure for all Americans, farmer’s rights to fair income within a system of corporate agriculture, freedom from monopolies, the right to housing, the right to medical care, social security and the right to an education. All ten participants in my survey said they could get behind some of this. However, when I pivoted to relate each of these points to policies proposed by Bernie Sanders, the tone changed. I leave you with one line of commentary from each of these baby boomers who support either Trump or Hillary: “So, they want more free stuff?” “It’s probably communism. Was FDR a communist?” “America isn’t about handouts. America is about helping yourself.” “We need poor people for the economy to function properly. Somebody has to do the (expletive) jobs.” “We have a population control problem. People not getting healthcare helps keep that in check.” “That sounds great but we can’t afford it.” “I didn’t get any of that and I did just fine.” “Terrorism is more important.” “We’re not Europe.” “Here we go with the fairy tales again.” There you have it. Now I’ll be true to my bombastic nature. I believe that one generation of voters stands between the revitalization of America or a dystopian future. Baby boomers who support Hillary or Trump don’t care about you or your children and your struggles. They don’t care if you have a roof over your head or a dream in your heart. They care that you keep the fast food restaurants open 24 hours a day and seven days a week, because all they care about are themselves. You are a cog in the machine until you drop dead. We have countries to invade and immigrants to kick out. May God bless America. 
The 2016 primary races on both sides of the aisle are led by two baby-boomer bully buddies. Say that five times fast. Though they’ve tried to distance themselves from each other, we know that the Clintons and Trumps were good enough friends to talk on the phone, golf together and attend events together. It’s no surprise that both candidates talk about “me” more than “we” and claim that they’re the only person in existence who can govern this great land of ours. They are of course both products of the “me generation,” and it certainly shows in their rhetoric.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Willie Green (#0)
The tax-paying citizenry deserves to dictate the government services their tax dollars support. The problem arises when the non-taxpaying citizenry dictates the government services they receive. But the real problem here is that Bernie is proposing $18 trillion in BRAND NEW spending.
Austan Goolsbee, the former chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, described Bernie's economic plan as, “Magic flying puppies with winning Lotto tickets tied to their collars.”
Hillary's promises are going to be delivered by her flying monkeys.
actually no . Justice Scalia once asked the solicitor general to name a single activity or program that our modernday Congress might undertake that would fall outside the bounds of the Constitution. He couldn't think of one.Article I, Section 8 defines the limits of Congress' authority to spend ......to “establish Post Offices and post roads; raise and support Armies; provide and maintain a Navy; declare War…” and to conduct a few other activities related mostly to national defense. No matter how long one searches, it is impossible to find in the Constitution any language that authorizes at least 90 percent of the civilian programs that Congress has initiated . Madison once criticized a spending bill that would give relief to French refugees. He wrote : “I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” Davey Crockett said in Congress : We have the right as individuals to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to appropriate a dollar of the public money. But since FDR the government has completely distorted the 'general welfare clause ' to permit Congress to spend on virtually anything they want to . "If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato
You have no right to demand what other people have produced and take it from them. An economy is like crops in a field. It grows at some rate. You do not have a "right" to be employed in that economy if it has not yet grown to the point to provide you with employment. Economic rights come only after having assumed the responsibility of having prepared for them. If you don't make the effort to prepare yourself adaquately, you do not have a "right" to demand entry into an economy where your substandard foolishness will contribute nothing but catastrophe or compensitory effort at remedy from other people. There has been entirely too much talk about rights and to little talk about prudence and responsibility.
The Progressive Army posted this. LMAO> Yes indeed, go to that site a check the link to Basic Training: What every progressive should know. TALK ABOUT BULLIES. The following comes directly fro the Basic Training: "Today we bury the late Justice Antonin Scalia. In life, he was a radical, Right-wing activist judge. A hero to Conservatives across the country. A warrior against social justice in all it’s forms. The Conservative Movement (CM) he belonged to has been grinding for decades to dilute progress. They never sleep. They have undermined our political discourse through well-funded think tanks, government, media & religion. They are always steps ahead. The truth is that Antonin Scalia was an overrated conservative hack. Originalism-as-clairvoyance was his chosen tool to circumvent stare decisis and logic. The maintenance of White Privilege for straight, Christian males and undergirding corporate plunder were his only guiding “principles.” He scoffed at the plight of the poor, imprisoned and downtrodden. His writings and public statements are full of thinly veiled racism and ignorance. Dog whistles to kindred spirits. Clarification of his goals and positions to the rest of us. Which of the seven habits are exhibited in just that one starement потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
In other words Communism. The Constitution provides the overarching framework wherein We The People (a collective) can exercise the rights enumerated above if We The People (a collective) choose Communism, or something like it, as their form of economic, social and political society. We The People (a collective) elect officials to make and enforce laws. If We The People (a collective) don't like the laws and believe that the laws are surpressing or curtailing the desired rights then We The People (a collective) will replace the elected officials with those that will make and enforce the more desired laws to allow the pursuit of the rights We The People (a collective) want. If We The People (a collective) want a command and control economy We The People will ultimately get one. If We The People (a collective) want a racist society We The People will ultimately get one. And so on. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
In other words Communism. --------------------------- In other words Communism. But more inportantly, Communism, built upon a verbally glorified compliance to indolence and theft.
"asking if the citizenry doesn’t deserve to dictate the government services their tax dollars support"
#2. To: misterwhite (#1)
#3. To: Roscoe (#2)
“Magic flying puppies with winning Lotto tickets tied to their collars.”
#4. To: Willie Green (#0)
"asking if the citizenry doesn’t deserve to dictate the government services their tax dollars support"
#5. To: Willie Green (#0)
(Edited)
It was FDR’s dream to have these passed as amendments to the Constitution, guaranteeing all Americans: the right to employment, high enough incomes to support food, clothing and leisure for all Americans, farmer’s rights to fair income within a system of corporate agriculture, freedom from monopolies, the right to housing, the right to medical care, social security and the right to an education.
#6. To: Willie Green, All (#0)
#7. To: rlk, Willie Green. (#5)
It was FDR’s dream to have these passed as amendments to the Constitution, guaranteeing all Americans: the right to employment, high enough incomes to support food, clothing and leisure for all Americans, farmer’s rights to fair income within a system of corporate agriculture, freedom from monopolies, the right to housing, the right to medical care, social security and the right to an education.
#8. To: SOSO (#7)
It was FDR’s dream to have these passed as amendments to the Constitution, guaranteeing all Americans: the right to employment, high enough incomes to support food, clothing and leisure for all Americans, farmer’s rights to fair income within a system of corporate agriculture, freedom from monopolies, the right to housing, the right to medical care, social security and the right to an education.
Bingo!
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]