politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: The libertarian case for Kasich
Source:
Rare
URL Source: http://rare.us/story/the-libertarian-case-for-kasich/
Published: Feb 11, 2016
Author: Rebekah Bydlak
Post Date: 2016-02-11 12:02:12 by Hondo68
Keywords: fiscal-defense hawk, criminal justice reform, not a libertarian
Views: 839
Comments: 4
One week ago, Rand Paul officially suspended his presidential campaign. While the move was perhaps inevitable after disappointing Iowa results, his absence did leave an unanswered question: Where will disaffected libertarians and independents go? Answers abounded almost immediately. Ted Cruz? Donald Trump? Even Bernie Sanders? The circular speculating belies an important point – the Paul campaign may have struggled, but as Reason’s Nick Gillespie recently pointed out, the electorate’s slow, steady move toward independence and libertarian sympathies continues. For years, I have considered myself very much a part of this “libertarian moment.” As a teenager, I found my political home in a rag-tag collection of activists motivated by the quixotic campaign of a doctor from Texas. As a college student, I thrived in libertarian student organizations and small-government activism. Today, I work every day helping lead an independent organization that’s dedicated to cutting government spending. It’s even thanks to “the movement” that I met my husband, who served as Dr. Paul’s fundraising director in 2008. In many ways, there’s little about the 2016 election that can make someone like me happy. On the Republican side, there are near-universal calls to bust budget caps; candidates itching for “carpet bombing” the Islamic State; and a populist frontrunner who casually discusses killing terrorists’ families, supports eminent domain and economic protectionism, and brags about bringing back “waterboarding and much worse.” And the Democrats? A hawkish establishment favorite or an open socialist. Hardly inspiring. Especially in light of these options, it’s time to take a second look at Tuesday night’s second-place finisher, Governor John Kasich. Coming off of his unexpected surge in the Granite State, Kasich will likely be getting a lot more attention in coming days. Libertarians and independents might find a lot to like. Kasich, who campaigned across New Hampshire with a portable debt clock, often talks of the fact that he was a “key player” in passing the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Drilling down into details, though, shows that his dedication to fiscal responsibility today is far more substantive than most of his rivals can claim. Business Insider called his leadership of Ohio the best among governors seeking the Presidency, based on Ohio’s high ranking in its Economic Evaluation of States. Under his tenure, the jobless rate in the state has gone from above the national average to 5 percent below, while a record number of businesses have been created. Federal fiscal policy also shows a clear distinction. In July, Defense One called him “the fiscal-defense hawk you don’t remember,” highlighting his effective fight as Budget Chair against buying more B-2 bombers and his push for overall Pentagon reforms. In August of this year, Governor Kasich caught heat from the neoconservative wing of his party for saying the Pentagon sequester “doesn’t matter” – because he wants to fight for savings even if he opposes the across-the-board cuts. In a field dominated by endless calls to hike Pentagon spending to the moon and back, Kasich often demurs, preferring to highlight his record fighting for reform at the nation’s largest bureaucracy, and saying he’ll spend more “if necessary.” To be clear – a prominent Republican whose last name is not Paul, Amash, or Massie, who wants to limit Pentagon spending is all but revolutionary in 2016. There’s a reason Jeb Bush plans to undertake a “scorched-Earth” campaign against Kasich in South Carolina, saying he “has consistently supported gutting the military.” Sharing common neoconservative enemies, of course, does not mean libertarians will be comfortable with Kasich’s foreign policy. He’s called for increasing the size of the Navy and is open to boots on the ground to fight ISIS. He’s meandered into discussions of “punching Putin on the nose” in recent debates. We may not be happy with what FiveThirtyEight recently characterized as a 71 percent hawkish platform, but stacked against the 100 percent dyed-in-the-wool neoconservatism of some his rivals, uncomfortable comments are perhaps less troubling. For libertarians, this election will not offer perfect options. Few elections do. Libertarians and independents can appreciate Kasich’s kind comments on gay marriage or his calls for sanity on immigration policy. We can get excited about his support for criminal justice reform and his all-too-rare nuanced position on NSA spying. But those same voters will rightly find themselves turned off by his stubborn opposition to marijuana legalization – and of course the very bad judgement call he and a half-dozen other GOP governors made on Medicaid expansion. Governor Kasich is unquestionably not a libertarian – why is he nevertheless worthy of support from independents and libertarians? The answer comes down to one factor: Results. Governor Kasich has many positions that ruffle libertarian feathers – but almost every one is shared in more extreme terms by the rest of the field. On the issues where he is libertarian-friendly, he often stands alone in stark contrast to his rivals and based on a history of tangible accomplishments. At the end of the day, results do matter, and if you’re a libertarian or independent voter who plans to vote in this bleakest of elections, your one bright spot may be a hopeful governor from Ohio.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
And Cruz supported Rand Paul's defense policy, even when it cost him votes and even after he's been attacked by Rubio and others as a weak sister on defense as a result of it. No way the RP crowd (either Ron or Rand) is going to vote for Kasich. I think the writer is a shameless hack, probably on Kasich's payroll or hoping to be.
Top Canadian picks. I think someone is smoking crack. Being anti military does not make you a libertarian. Remember Goldwater. We need the very best military and I would vote against anyone that says otherwise. At the same time this does not mean we have to be in every country on the planet which is what neocons think. No or small military would cause a military build up from communist/fascist nations. This would lead to world wars in just a few years. Trump has it right here. Be so bad that no one will mess with you. If they do punish them harshly. This is were socialist and peaceniks like to cut when its the number one job of the federal government. Protect its people from the outside world! Clearly we spend to much on military but between 2 wars what do you expect? Still not near the cost of bribery to vote scam we call welfare state.
With all the vet voters in SC and his brother coming to campaign for him, this is the natural line of attack. And there is enough to hurl the mud at Kasich on this. And we know the Bush family is no stranger to the dirtiest tricks in SC politics.
There’s a reason Jeb Bush plans to undertake a “scorched-Earth” campaign against Kasich in South Carolina, saying he “has consistently supported gutting the military.”
#2. To: TooConservative (#1)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#3. To: TooConservative, hondo68 (#1)
There’s a reason Jeb Bush plans to undertake a “scorched-Earth” campaign against Kasich in South Carolina, saying he “has consistently supported gutting the military.”
#4. To: Justified (#3)
There’s a reason Jeb Bush plans to undertake a “scorched-Earth” campaign against Kasich in South Carolina, saying he “has consistently supported gutting the military.”
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]