Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income
Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?
"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"
"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"
"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"
Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)
Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’
‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber
Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'
Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.
No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !
"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "
"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"
"The Teleprompter Campaign"
Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh
"Pagans in Paris"
"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".
"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t
Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter
Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service
Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement
Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally
Trump Assassination Attempt
We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.
Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop
Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation
2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises
Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details
Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit
AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.
If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.
"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"
How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion
Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men
Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.
South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel
Today I turned 50!
San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee
Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas
Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!
Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park
Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'
Will it ever end?
Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?
Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version
There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists
The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.
Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders
The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena
How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News See other United States News Articles Title: Is Cruz the frontrunner now?
Source:
HotAir
URL Source: http://hotair.com/archives/2016/02/10/is-cruz-the-frontrunner-now/
Published: Feb 10, 2016
Author: Allahpundit
Post Date: 2016-02-11 08:24:55 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None Views: 1067
Comments: 29
Yep, says Philip Klein. I hope hes right, but Im not sure the takeaway from a blowout win for Trump in New Hampshire is that its now Ted Cruzs race to lose. Though Trumps victory in New Hampshire was no doubt impressive, the electorate of independent voters and super high turnout was tailor-made for him, whereas Cruz didnt put substantial effort into winning the state where very conservative candidates dont typically do as well. He is currently in position to win third here, with votes still outstanding. As the race moves to South Carolina, however, Cruz has a ground game in place and the electorate is much more tailored to his strengths
Furthermore, in Iowa, Cruz had to fend off Ben Carson, Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum, who were all competing for similar voters. Carson received 9 percent in Iowa, and though Huckabee didnt perform well, he did serve as an anti-Cruz attack dog to evangelicals. Now, Huckabee and Santorum are out, and Carson enters South Carolina greatly hobbled
[N]ow that the field has narrowed down and Trump has won a primary and proven himself a serious threat, there will be a lot more focus on his liberal record on abortion, guns, healthcare, property rights among other issues. | Lets look at this short-term and longer-term. Short-term, Kleins right about South Carolina being way more favorable to Cruz than New Hampshire was. Its hard to believe that the guy who won Iowa based on his strength with evangelicals, whos already distinguished himself for having an outstanding ground game, is going to finish any worse than second in a state where evangelicals make up a huge segment of the electorate. (Thats also why its hard to believe a Rubio comeback, which would require a strong third place at a minimum, is in the offing. Cruz is in his way.) No one will be surprised if Cruz wins there on February 20th. But
no one will be surprised if Trump wins there either, right? Klein is correct that all of the polls showing Trump with a big lead in SC were taken before Cruz won Iowa, but they were also taken before Trump blew out the field in New Hampshire last night. Trump built his lead in the SC polls at a moment when it was still an open question whether he was nothing but media hype, a guy who was getting by on name recognition and camera time whose voters would evaporate into thin air once they were required to actually go out and vote. Trump put that to rest last night. Now hes headed into South Carolina with new credibility as a potential nominee and, in all likelihood, a poll bounce. I can buy that some evangelicals in South Carolina are going to shift to Cruz by dint of his win in Iowa. I can, however, also buy that some South Carolinians who held off on expressing their support for Trump before, whether out of embarrassment or simply because they thought his candidacy would fizzle early, are going to shift to Trump. The first polls in SC this week should show a tighter race than they showed in January but theres every reason to think Trump will still lead. And unlike Cruz, Trump doesnt need to worry as much about voters in his lane defecting to Rubio as he scrapes for a comeback. Its quite possible that Trump wins narrowly in SC because a few too many evangelicals wanted to give Marco a second chance at Cruzs expense. Related to that, dont forget that Trump so far has been competitive among evangelical voters, a bloc which you might assume would belong exclusively to Rubio and Cruz. Cruz did win decisively among evangelicals in Iowa, which probably accounted for the margin of his victory, but Trump finished tied with Rubio for those voters. Last night in New Hampshire, Trump (narrowly) won evangelicals along with virtually every other demographic. It could be that Cruz repeats his Iowa performance with born-again voters in South Carolina, but as I say, it could also be that some portion of the electorate that was skeptical of Trump evangelicals included will be newly open to considering him after his big win. If Cruz wins evangelicals narrowly in SC and Trump wins non-evangelicals comfortably, how would you expect the outcome of that race to go? And all of this assumes that the advantage Cruz got from his ground game in Iowa will also obtain in South Carolina. Team Trump is no doubt trying to catch up organizationally there, but even if you think theres no chance theyll succeed, consider that Kasich and Bush and Rubio also surely had organizational advantages over Trump in New Hampshire. Howd that work out? I cant remember who said it, but someone on Twitter noted last night that the most terrifying thing about the NH results for anti-Trumpers is that he actually outperformed his polls by four points. It may be that Trump will continue to struggle to match Cruz in turning out voters in caucus states but that statewide primaries will even the playing field. South Carolina is, of course, a primary state. But all of that is near-term. Even if Cruz wins South Carolina and outperforms Trump in the SEC primary, how does the rest of the race look? WaPo posted this graphic this morning as evidence of Cruzs strength, but theres good reason here not to count Trump out too: Lots of evangelicals waiting for Cruz in the south, to be sure. But
not nearly as many outside the south, which is a big problem, no? The whole point of last nights outcome is that, in states where born-again Christians are less of a factor, Trump can blow out the competition. Well, there are lots of states like that and lots of them will vote after March 15th, when delegates can be awarded winner-take-all instead of proportionally. Cruz supporters, and I include myself here, seem to be following an underpants gnome blueprint to ultimate victory that runs something like this: Step one: Cruz beats Trump in Iowa, South Carolina, and in the SEC primary Step two: ???????? Step three: Cruz is nominee! Really? What happens when it really is a two-man race and, say, California and New York and other blue/purple states have to choose between the conservative fire-breather Cruz and the moderate deal-making centrist Trump? Cruz fans seem to be counting on dealing Trump enough losses that he simply gets demoralized and drops out at some point, but one of the huge consequences of last nights result, I think, is that theres much less of a chance of that now. Trump losing in Iowa and New Hampshire and South Carolina and Nevada really might have convinced him to throw in the towel in the name of saving face, but now that hes proved he can roll to a landslide in a purple state, he has every incentive to take his lumps in the south and bide his time for a true Trump vs. Cruz binary choice in the rest of the country. And that assumes that Cruz really does win big in the south, where hes expected to. Trump has consistently outpolled him there so far. Maybe that changed after Iowa. But, thanks to New Hampshire, maybe it didnt. Well know soon. Id give Trump something like a 60 percent chance at the nomination at this point and Cruz a 35 percent chance (which means PredictWise is underrating both of them). How ironic, though, that its probably going to fall to Ted Cruz, establishment bete noire, to save the GOP from Trump. Even more ironic: Establishmentarians will fight him the whole way. |
Poster Comment: Allahpundit underlines how tenuous Cruz's path to victory is. And the even more dismal prospects of a Bush or Rubio or other GOPe candidate to prevail over Trump. To liberals, Trump is more liberal than any GOPe conservatives because they (rightly) believe he's just playing the rubes and hayseeds. To conservatives, all Trump has to do is mutter vaguely about making Mexico pay to build a wall to keep out those Mexican rapists. Trump, like 0bama prevailing over McCain in 2008 and even Romney in 2012, manages to be on both the Right and the Left of his opponents. (1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
|