United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Montana Judge Refuses To Convict Anyone of Marijuana Possession
Source:
Counter Current News
URL Source: http://countercurrentnews.com/2016/ ... -convict-anyone-of-possession/
Published: Feb 9, 2016
Author: M. David
Post Date: 2016-02-10 15:01:48 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2423
Comments: 20
This is jury nullification in action, and as a result, a Montana judge has refused to convict anyone of marijuana possession. In Montana, Teuray Cornell was arrested on a marijuana possession charge. But he only had about as much marijuana as it would take to roll a single joint. The police tried to suggest that he was a marijuana dealer – even with this small amount of the plant. Montana is well-known to be a fairly conservative state, but when it came time for the pre-trial jury screening of this man, the judge simply could not find people willing to convict the man. The judge could not find one single person who was willing to convict a man over a small amount of marijuana. The New York Times reports: To seat a 12-person jury, Judge Robert L. Deschamps III of Missoula County District Court had called a passel of Montanans to serve, and 27 had arrived at court on Dec. 16. So far, so good. But after the charges were read, one of the jurors raised a hand. “She said, ‘I’ve got a real problem with these marijuana cases,’ ” Judge Deschamps recalled on Wednesday. “And after she got through, a couple more raised their hands.” All told, five jurors raised questions about marijuana prosecution. Mr. Cornell the misdemeanor possession charge was dismissed out of fear that 12 jurors who would convict in this marijuana-friendly state, could simply not be found. John Masterson, the founder and director of the Montana chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, told the Times that using marijuana “is essentially a mainstream activity” in Missoula. “It’s something that people of all walks of life enjoy responsibly,” Masterson explained. “This was something I’d never encountered before,” Judge Deschamps said. “It does raise a question about the next case,” indicating to the Times that he would not convict people of similar charges in the future. Watch the video report below and help SPREAD THE WORD about jury nullification!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
This is the death knell for pot laws. They will increasingly find it hard to indict or convict people on pot charges when other states allow it freely and so many people are breaking the law.
All well and good for a law you don't like. And when it's a law you support? Is this the way to go about it? Why not simply overturn the law? Oh, you don't have the votes?
There is a history of juries nullifying laws. This seems to be a modern instance. Now everyone getting busted for pot in Montana will think hard about demanding a jury trial, to force the issue. And some will do it just to push nullification. Montana got very near decriminalizing pot about 20-25 years back as I recall. So this is fertile ground for nullification.
Apparently Montana legalized medical marijuana about a decade ago and it got out of control. Now they're trying to undo large sections of it. Their laws against recreational use are strict.
I think we've crossed the Rubicon on pot laws. Maybe on all the drug laws. After all, legal opiate overdoses kill about as many now as illegal drugs do. The doctor is becoming little more than the pusher of a high-grade product. In this way, both legal pharma drugs and legal pot in some states is sounding the death knell for most drug laws. After all, what are they going to do, close the borders to stop the Mexican heroin and other drugs? Don't make me laugh.
The death knell is due to the lack of federal enforcement. And we'll see what happens when marijuana starts crossing state lines in bulk.
There is a lot of enforcement. Do you or your friends profit from prison industry? Number one in the world?
#19. To: A Pole (#10)
"The Obama administration’s position will be important because, until now, the Justice Department has looked the other way while states like Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska…decriminalized the recreational use of marijuana."
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: TooConservative (#1)
"They will increasingly find it hard to indict or convict people on pot charges when other states allow it freely and so many people are breaking the law."
#5. To: misterwhite (#3)
Is this the way to go about it? Why not simply overturn the law? Oh, you don't have the votes?
#7. To: TooConservative (#5)
#8. To: misterwhite (#7)
#9. To: TooConservative (#8)
"In this way, both legal pharma drugs and legal pot in some states is sounding the death knell for most drug laws."
#10. To: misterwhite (#9)
The death knell is due to the lack of federal enforcement.
Replies to Comment # 10. "There is a lot of enforcement."
End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]