Mexican Invasion
See other Mexican Invasion Articles
Title: Illegal Immigrant Injured on the Job Sues for Lost Wages, Benefits He Shouldn’t Have Been Getting
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... he-shouldnt-have-been-getting/
Published: Feb 5, 2016
Author: Warner Todd Huston
Post Date: 2016-02-06 19:13:54 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 1224
Comments: 8
Court documents say Noe Escamilla slipped and fell in 2010 while trying to lifting a heavy piece of stone at Wabash College in Crawfordsville, Indiana, and now, according to doctors, he can’t lift more than 20 pounds. Escamilla is suing the Indianapolis-based construction and maintenance company Shiel Sexton Co., saying his injuries now prevent him from earning a living. The 29-year-old Escamilla already tried to take his claims to court once, but a Montgomery County Superior Court judge ruled that, because he is an undocumented worker, he could not claim the money and benefits. The judge based her decision in part on the fact that Escamilla violated federal law by misrepresenting his immigration status on his job application. He is now taking his case to the Indiana Court of Appeals to reverse Judge Heather Dennison’s ruling denying his claims. KHOU.com reports that investigators discovered that, in 2008 when he was hired by Masonry by Mohler, a subcontractor of Shiel Sexton, he gave them a stolen Social Security number belonging to someone living in California. The company never verified the worker’s information when he was hired. He was on the job two years before he was injured. Further, since his injury, Escamilla was granted permanent residency status by Obama’s Department of Homeland Security in 2014. Some experts claim neither of the companies Escamilla is associated with have any liability at all and the plaintiff has no grounds at all to sue. Other experts have speculated Escamilla might prevail if he asks for the benefits and wages paid at the levels he would have earned in Mexico for similar work. But Chad Staller, president of The Center for Forensic Economic Studies, told the Indy Star the scheme might not work and Escamilla would be better served to demand the full wages of an American citizen. “Based upon all the factors in this matter, the earnings power of Mr. Escamilla based upon the Mexican peso may not accurately represent Mr. Escamilla’s future economic damages,” Staller told the paper. The case has no precedent in Indiana and could be a banner decision for illegal immigrants. If the case is adjudicated in Escamilla’s favor, workers who have no legal status could benefit greatly in future injury cases and such a decision would tend toward breaking down the rules preventing illegals from receiving benefits for which they currently do not qualify. 
An illegal immigrant, who was permanently injured on the job in Indianapolis, is suing to recover the wages and other benefits he lost after his injury, even though, as an undocumented worker, he shouldn’t even have been employed.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: cranky (#0)
The case SHOULD be decided in the worker's favor. Yes, he was here illegally. And he had no right to work. But his employer had no right to hire him, and no right to derive any sort of profit FROM his work. The employer did in fact hire him, and did in fact profit from his work. Once an employer hires somebody and puts him on the job, the employer is fully responsible for workplace injuries, regardless of the legal status of the worker. By hiring the illegal worker, the employer took the risk of breaking employment laws. That DOES NOT, and SHOULD NOT, give the employer exoneration from worker's insurance or worker injury. The worker can be deported, because he's illegal, and collect his settlement to spend it in Mexico. But there is no reason whatever to allow an employer who CHOSE to hire illegals (in order to make more profit) to then weasel out of legal responsibility for injuries also. because of the illegal status of the worker. The worker AND THE EMPLOYER broke laws, but breaking one law - an immigration law - does not, and SHOULD NOT - exonerate everybody else with regards to the illegal. A comparable example "Oh, she was an ILLEGAL, so it was ok to rape her?" No, she was an illegal, she had no right to be here, but her illegal status does not mean that legal residents have open season to do whatever the hell. "Oh, he was speeding, so it was ok for me to shoot him when he cut me off - he was breaking the law." "He was an ILLEGAL, so I'm not responsible if I run him over drunk driver." Absurd. His illegal status had nothing to do with his injury, other than the fact that the employer probably hired him BECAUSE he was illegal - so that the employer could avoid paying various taxes and insurance he would have to pay on a legal. Now he's injured, the employer does not get to benefit AGAIN by not having responsibility for his workplace injuries.
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
I'm not sure a criminal has (or should have) a legal right to profit from his/her crime. But I'll wait for the next court decision.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 1. Once an employer hires somebody and puts him on the job, the employer is fully responsible for workplace injuries, regardless of the legal status of the worker.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]