Religion
See other Religion Articles
Title: Anger and Citizenship
Source:
First Things
URL Source: http://www.firstthings.com/web-excl ... /2016/02/anger-and-citizenship
Published: Feb 3, 2016
Author: by George Weigel
Post Date: 2016-02-04 17:34:22 by redleghunter
Ping List: *Bible Study Ping* Subscribe to *Bible Study Ping*
Keywords: None
Views: 2312
Comments: 15
The Iowa caucuses are in the rear-view mirror, the New Hampshire primary looms on the horizon, and by most media accounts, the leitmotif of Campaign 2016 is “anger.” As in: a lot-of-Americans-are-angry-and-that-explains-the attraction-of-certain-candidates, whether that be the anti-political-correctness anger of Donald Trump voters, the anti-government anger of Ted Cruz voters, or the Obama-hasn’t-been-radical-enough anger of Bernie Sanders voters. For those of us with long cinematic memories, it’s rather reminiscent of the Howard Beale character in Network, urging people to stick their heads out the window and holler, “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!” I get it. My own reactions to the papers I read daily, the magazines I read weekly, and the news programs I watch occasionally are not often conducive to a happy blood pressure reading. Yet whatever my sympathies may be with this, that, or the other wrath du jour, I hope that, as the 2016 campaign unfolds, the electorate will begin to understand that anger is not a particularly healthy metric of public life. The first Marquis of Halifax, George Savile, a 17th-century English statesman and a notable phrase-maker, ranks second only to the immortal Dr. Johnson in the number of entries in The Viking Book of Aphorisms. There, I find this small gem: “Anger is never without an argument, but seldom with a good one.” Does that ring a bell or two, my fellow Americans? It should, given the character of the presidential “debate” thus far. And that warning bell suggests that we’ve got a problem. For serious debate, conducted with civility, is the lifeblood of democracy. Civility does not preclude passion. Given the gravity of the issues before us in 2016—which involve the future of freedom around the world and the dignity of the human person here at home—passion is entirely welcome. But passion is not anger. Anger is a glandular thing. An angry politics is a politics of the gut. A passionate politics, informed and disciplined by reason, can be a politics of the intelligence, a politics of great ideas: a politics, if you will, of sound moral judgment. And sound moral judgment is rarely, if ever, the child of anger. Most of us recognize that in our personal lives. We ought to recognize it in our public lives, too.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#1. To: redleghunter (#0)
Bum bum bum...
Bernie Sanders and Hildabeast voters don't want changes, they want REVOLUTION. That is what they were revved up to do. Riots in the streets, burn down the city, KILL DA MAN starting with banksters of course. They were promised this by multiple Democrats, now they are pissed off that they haven't delivered. The revolutionaries were promised a free reign in the hell they want to bring, so they turn from Cankles to Bernie giving them the key to the US treasury. Hill wants to get them to total communism slower than Sanders, that is all.
Yep. Don't need a Weatherman to see which way their wind blows...
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#5. To: VxH (#1)
or the Obama-hasn’t-been-radical-enough anger of Bernie Sanders voters.
#7. To: jeremiad (#5)
That is what they were revved up to do.
Replies to Comment # 7.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]