[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
The Establishments war on Donald Trump Title: Anti-Trump Saudi Prince Tied to Both Rupert Murdoch And Hillary Aide Fox mogul Rupert Murdoch is partnered in multiple media ventures with Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaweed Bin Talal, including an Arabic religious TV network with a direct tie to Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin. Both Prince Alwaweed Bin Talal and Murdoch’s Fox News network have become vocal critics of GOP Presidential frontrunner Donald Trump. On December 11, 2015 Bin Tala took to Twitter to savage Trump: الوليد بن طلال ✔ Withdraw from the U.S presidential race as you will never win. The Al-Resalah TV network is a venture created by Alwaleed in association with Rupert Murdoch. As The Guardian reported in 2010: A company headed by the Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal says it plans to launch a new Arabic television news channel in partnership with Rupert Murdoch’s Fox network. The prince said the Kingdom Holding company’s 24-hour channel “will be an addition and alternative” for Arab viewers. It will compete with al-Arabiya and al-Jazeera. Al-Resalah TV’s stated goal is to “present true Islam” but the network’s programming has been often been radical. As The Sun reported in 2006: [M]uch of the content on his TV channel is overtly anti-Western. On March 31, the secretary-general of Al-Resalah, Sheik Tareq Al-Suweidan, gave a speech at Dialogue between Europe and Muslims, a convention in Copenhagen that the channel was covering. “The West have done strategic mistakes … they underestimate the power of Islam,” he said. Sheik Suweidan praised the election of Hamas and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, warning: “The West have no chance but to deal with Islam, and we are extending our hands in peace and dialogue – you have slapped it. We do not accept insults.” According to the official website of Prince Alaweed, one of the members of the Supreme Advisory board for his Al-Resalah TV network is “Dr. Abdullah Naseef, President of World Muslim Congress and President of Forum For Social Studies (FFSS).” As Breitbart News has extensively documented, Al-Resalah TV board member Dr. Naseef is the longtime benefactor of top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s family business, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. As Vanity Fair reported: When (Huma) Abedin was two years old, the family moved to Jidda, Saudi Arabia, where, with the backing of Abdullah Omar Nasseef, then the president of King Abdulaziz University, her father founded the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, a think tank, and became the first editor of its Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, which stated its mission as “shedding light” on minority Muslim communities around the world in the hope of “securing the legitimate rights of these communities.” … It turns out the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs is an Abedin family business. Huma was an assistant editor there between 1996 and 2008. Her brother, Hassan, 45, is a book-review editor at the Journal and was a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, where Nasseef is chairman of the board of trustees. Huma’s sister, Heba, 26, is an assistant editor at the Journal. … In his early years as the patron of the Abedins’ journal, Nasseef was the secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which Andrew McCarthy () claims “has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.” The Muslim World League was the mother organization of two groups the U.S. government thinks was involved in funneling money to terrorists–the Rabita Trust and the International Islamic Relief Organization (IIRO). Both groups are listed on the Treasury department’s website of terrorist organizations. Naseef’s Rabita Trust co-founder Wa’el Hamza Julaidan was one of the founders of Al Qaeda. These connections have been hidden by the mainstream media. Breitbart News demonstrated attempted to muddy the connection between Saudi Arabian raised Huma Abedin and Nassef when questions about Abedin were raised by a group of Congress members in 2012. It’s been widely reported that Bin Talal is a large investor in Murdoch’s Fox News, but much less attention has been paid to Al-Resalah. In early 2015, Bin Talal’s Kingdom Holding Company reduced his stake in Murdoch’s News Corp to 1 percent but maintains a 6.6 percent interest in 21st Century Fox, which controls Fox News. As CNN Money reported: News Corp. is Murdoch’s publishing operation, made up of the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal as well as the book publisher HarperCollins. The more valuable 21st Century Fox is home to a host of television and film properties such as Fox Searchlight, the Fox broadcasting network and Fox News. … “We have a strategic alliance with Rupert Murdoch for sure and I have been with him for the last 15 or 20 years,” Alwaleed said. “My backing of Rupert Murdoch is definitely unwavering.” The connection between Alwaleed, Murdoch, Abedin, Hillary Clinton and Saudi Arabia are troubling given a number of recent events. Prince Alwaleed is boasting about his role in impacting U.S. elections. As Breitbart News Network’s Aaron Klein reported, the Saudi Arabian news site Sabq claims that “Alwaweed Bin Talal caused a decline in Trump’s popularity.” CNN reported in 2008 that “donations to the William J. Clinton Foundation include amounts of $10 million to $25 million from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” Huma Abedin was hired as a consultant to the William J. Clinton Foundation after Clinton left her role as Secretary of State. Abedin is also at the center of Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal. Huma Abedin’s mother currently lives in Saudi Arabia and runs the Journal for Muslim Minority Affairs and is also a dean at a woman’s college there. Poster Comment: America's ruling class is in bed with the filth running Saudi Arabia. American blood should never be shed on behalf of these kleptocratic Persian Gulf monarchies. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
If that is the case then why has the administration completely destroyed any working relationship we have with the Saudis(especially during the time that Evita was Sec State) in favor of a new alliance with the 12er's in Tehran ? The question is ,do we want another Sunni failed state for the Islamic State to contest ? Because the way it looks to me is that the US has abandoned any pretext of support for Saudi Arabia . They have the threat of the Islamic State ,Shia takeovers of territory in Yemen ,and an emerging Shia empire across the Gulf . They have domestic unrest at home . The ruling family is old with no logical line of succession . King Salman is 80 and nearly senile. Their ploy to pump excess oil on the market has been a disaster to them. All this came to a head when they executed a bunch of prisoners including radical Shia cleric Sheik Nimr al-Nimr . That set off a chain reaction of events .Demonstrators in Iran set fire to Saudi Arabia's embassy in Tehran, unrestrained by riot police. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the Saudi leaders would face “divine vengeance.” Saudi Arabia broke diplomatic relations with Iran and demanded that other Arab countries follow suit. (Only a few did) . Now in the past ,these events would've caused a statement of support by the US government . There was none . Instead ,the US appears to be taking the Iranian side. So where is the support from that the ruling class that is supposedly bought and paid for by the Saudis ? "If you do not take an interest in the affairs of your government, then you are doomed to live under the rule of fools." Plato
You noticed? The U. S. is taking the Iranian, and jihadist side on everything. We have an islamic infiltrated and influenced government. That's what we got with "hope and change".
We don't have an embassy in Iran, haven't since 1979; so it would be hard for the US to have followed the lead of the House of Saud on this one. Notice that the House of Saud maintained relations with Iran after the seized our embassy, seems like there's no expectation that they follow our lead. The Iranians and Saudis are both dirtbags, our foreign policy should be for them to kill each other. The only thing to root for is the body count. Allah is pleased by the blood of those who martyr themselves on his behalf. The Sunni and Shia need to prove who loves Allah more. The Saudis are the ones who've been spreading Wahhabism, they're the root cause behind ISIS, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brothers. If you're worried about securing China's oil supply, let China do it. I'd be happy to see them embrace that tar baby. Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria
The sunni and the shiia need to settle their differences much like the catholic and orthodox have and move on. Carrying on a 1,400 year old argument about succession is unproductive particularly when it becomes open warfare
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|