The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles
Title: National Review Pens Letter to Conservatives: Don’t Vote for Trump
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/21/national-review/
Published: Jan 22, 2016
Author: Michelle Fields
Post Date: 2016-01-22 07:49:27 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 4612
Comments: 41
The new issue of the long-established conservative magazine is headlined “Against Trump” and includes essays from conservative pundits and writers explaining their opposition to Trump’s candidacy. But the overall theme is very clear: “Trump is a philosophically unmoored political opportunist who would trash the broad conservative ideological consensus within the GOP in favor of a free-floating populism with strong-man overtones,” says the editorial that leads the issue. The authors argue that Trump isn’t consistent in his views: Trump’s political opinions have wobbled all over the lot. The real-estate mogul and reality-TV star has supported abortion, gun control, single-payer health care à la Canada, and punitive taxes on the wealthy. (He and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) have shared more than funky outer-borough accents.) Since declaring his candidacy he has taken a more conservative line, yet there are great gaping holes in it. The editorial also goes after his immigration plan for not being practical. As for illegal immigration, Trump pledges to deport the 11 million illegals here in the United States, a herculean administrative and logistical task beyond the capacity of the federal government. Trump piles on the absurdity by saying he would re-import many of the illegal immigrants once they had been deported, which makes his policy a poorly disguised amnesty (and a version of a similarly idiotic idea that appeared in one of Washington’s periodic ‘comprehensive immigration’ reforms). This plan wouldn’t survive its first contact with reality. They also took aim at his business record: Trump’s primary work long ago became less about building anything than about branding himself and tending to his celebrity through a variety of entertainment ventures, from WWE to his reality-TV show, The Apprentice. His business record reflects the often dubious norms of the milieu: using eminent domain to condemn the property of others; buying the good graces of politicians—including many Democrats—with donations. The editorial finishes by saying that “Donald Trump is a menace to American conservatism who would take the work of generations and trample it underfoot in behalf of a populism as heedless and crude as the Donald himself.” The online issue is here. 
National Review is publishing a special edition of the magazine that argues against Republican frontrunner Donald Trump, saying he is “not deserving of conservative support in the caucuses and primaries.”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
#1. To: cranky (#0)
The editorial also goes after his immigration plan for not being practical. The editorial finishes by saying that “Donald Trump is a menace to American conservatism As opposed to the authors, who have been consistently in favor of crony capitalism since the day they were weaned. As opposed to the conservative immigration plan of simply replacing the American population with Mexicans. As opposed to the authors' form of conservatism, which is simply a menace to America, period.
If someone who wants a bigger, more intrusive Federal government and/or favors America having only three borders can be labelled a 'conservative' or have 'conservative' values, the word no longer has any meaning. As for Trump, the msm keeps reminding me Trump is a 'populist' not a Republicrat as though that somehow disqualifies him from running for office.
A populist spouting a conservative agenda. Something wrong with that? I thought the GOP wanted to expand their base. Maybe the National Review prefers the true-blue, hard-core, conservative-on-every-issue who, once in office, turns his back on the voters and joins the establishment. They're afraid of Trump. They know he's going to do what he says and that scares the living shit out of them.
Actually, imho, NR is more of a big government, crony capitalist, open borders, single-payer healthcare, nwo supporting kind of 'conservative' organ.
This makes them conservative? If so, then I'm glad Trump isn't a conservative as defined by them.
I don't think he's conservative as defined by Will or Krauthammer, either and both of them seem to think they are allowed to define who or what is or isn't conservative.
Exactly. Rather than labels (which no one can agree on), simply judge Trump by what he's saying. Another thing to think about. What have these "true conservatives" done for us while in office? I mean, abortion is still legal. Illegals are still flooding the country. Taxes are still high. Spending is out of control. It's not as though everything is peachy-keen and Trump might ruin it because he's not the right kind of conservative.
I like hearing what he's saying. I just know how much of it he believes. I can still remember Stephi saying about Bubba: "The President will keep the promises he meant to keep."
We're not electing a dictator. We're supposed to be electing someone to lead, someone with an agenda, someone with a plan. My concern is that, unlike the private sector, Trump can't simply order that something be done and it's done. He has to work with Congress. Now, that can be either bad or good. Bad if he can't sway them. Good if he goes off track then Congress can stop him.
#20. To: misterwhite (#19)
All true. I think he will be OK, after all, he has a history of working with planners, architects, bureaucrats, contractors, suppliers, etc, etc. I will take my chances with him, before I will trust any of the others. I think you will agree with that.
Obama commands by Executive Orders. So did other Presidents. Trump is not a "strict originalist constitutionalist". He is a practical results-oriented man. He will establish his policies by Executive Orders, defend them, and seek Congress to make those orders permanent through legislation. Delay has been the game both parties play when one or the other is on top. Trump is not going to let them play that game. He will issue the Executive Orders, get the Executive Departments doing what needs to be done, and that will establish a constituency for those things which he will then use to bring Congress into line.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe authors argue that Trump isn’t consistent in his views
#3. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
As opposed to the authors' form of conservatism, which is simply a menace to America, period.
#6. To: cranky (#3)
"As for Trump, the msm keeps reminding me Trump is a 'populist'
#7. To: misterwhite (#6)
Maybe the National Review prefers the true-blue, hard-core, conservative-on-every-issue who, once in office, turns his back on the voters and joins the establishment.
#10. To: cranky (#7)
" ... NR is more of a big government, crony capitalist, open borders, single-payer healthcare, nwo supporting kind of 'conservative' organ."
#13. To: misterwhite (#10)
If so, then I'm glad Trump isn't a conservative as defined by them.
#15. To: cranky (#13)
"I don't think he's conservative as defined by Will or Krauthammer, either and both of them seem to think they are allowed to define who or what is or isn't conservative."
#18. To: misterwhite (#15)
simply judge Trump by what he's saying.
#19. To: cranky (#18)
"I just know how much of it he believes."
Replies to Comment # 19. " Trump can't simply order that something be done and it's done. He has to work with Congress. "
#24. To: misterwhite (#19)
Trump can't simply order that something be done and it's done. He has to work with Congress.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]