Watching The Cops
See other Watching The Cops Articles
Title: Justin Amash on Tamir Rice Outcome: Cops Don’t Deserve Extra Leniency
Source:
Reason
URL Source: https://reason.com/blog/2015/12/29/ ... ash-on-tamir-rice-outcome-cops
Published: Dec 31, 2015
Author: Robby Soave
Post Date: 2015-12-31 05:36:53 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3939
Comments: 14
Of course authorities and adjudicators thought the killing was justified—they are instructed to ignore the victim’s perspective, and only consider whether inaction could have conceivably put the officers’ lives at risk, in the imaginations of the officers. That’s the legal standard, so it’s hardly a surprise it was obeyed. But not everyone is thrilled with a standard that tilts the scales of justice so decisively in the cops’ favor nearly every single time. Libertarian-leaning Republican Rep. Justin Amash had this to say about the Tamir Rice decision on Twitter: Policing cannot be both risk-free and effective. Officers must be patient, put own lives at risk to responsibly manage dangerous situations. Police should not be given more leniency when it comes to self-defense than any other person. I also raised on Twitter yesterday. In a sane world, one might expect the cops to receive less leniency than ordinary citizens in cases where they kill a harmless, unarmed boy. After all, they are trained to successfully navigate tense situations: it’s literally their job to go to great lengths to keep people alive. We might even expect the police—again, the people we pay to take on some degree of risk—to use a different calculus than the average person when weighing threats to their own lives against threats to others. As Jamelle Bouie writes at Slate: Part of policing is risk. Not just the inevitable risk of the unknown, but voluntary risk. We ask police to “serve and protect” the broad public, which—at times—means accepting risk when necessary to defuse dangerous situations and protect lives, innocent or otherwise. It’s why we give them weapons and the authority to use them; why we compensate them with decent salaries and generous pensions; why we hold them in high esteem and why we give them wide berth in procedure and practice. What we see with Tamir Rice—and what we’ve seen in shootings across the country—is what happens when the officer’s safety supercedes the obligation to accept risk. If “going home” is what matters—and risk is unacceptable—then the instant use of lethal force makes sense. It’s the only thing that guarantees complete safety from harm. It’s also antithetical to the call to “serve and protect.” But it’s the new norm. Indeed. And as long as the norm prevails, there will be more Tamir Rices—and more grieving mothers deprived of justice. The lives of the agents of the state matter infinitely more than the lives of regular people. Why do the police get away with crimes ordinary citizens would go to jail for?
Tamir Rice
The grand jury’s decision not to charge either of the two police officers who killed 12-year-old Tamir Rice in a Cleveland park last year is as frustrating as it was predetermined.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
I tend to agree with this,but in THIS case,didn't the kid have a fake gun on him that he pointed at the police? When you go around pointing what looks like guns at police or anyone else,you pretty much have to expect somebody is going to shoot you.
He didn't get a chance to point the toy gun at the cops - they opened fire within seconds of arriving at the scene.
He modified the gun by removing the DayGlo orange tip identifying it as a toy. Why did he do that Deckard? Why did his grieving parents allow him to do that Deckard? Why was he running around the park pointing this gun at people Deckard, scaring them, resulting in the 911 call? You're quick to point the finger at the cops while conveniently ignoring the actions of others.
Nah, they'd have smoked that kid even if he had the orange day-glo tip. That cop just wanted to earn bragging rights among his buddies.
#8. To: Logsplitter (#7)
And if had been a real gun and he smoked a cop, you and your comrades would be cheering yourselves hoarse.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestPart of policing is risk. Not just the inevitable risk of the unknown, but voluntary risk. We ask police to “serve and protect” the broad public, which—at times—means accepting risk when necessary to defuse dangerous situations and protect lives, innocent or otherwise. It’s why we give them weapons and the authority to use them; why we compensate them with decent salaries and generous pensions; why we hold them in high esteem and why we give them wide berth in procedure and practice.
#2. To: sneakypete (#1)
I tend to agree with this,but in THIS case,didn't the kid have a fake gun on him that he pointed at the police?
#3. To: Deckard (#2)
"He didn't get a chance to point the toy gun at the cops"
#7. To: misterwhite (#3)
Replies to Comment # 7. they'd have smoked that kid even if he had the orange day-glo tip.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]