[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Executive Order or Not, ‘I’m Not Surrendering the Guns’
Source: Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... -not-im-not-surrendering-guns/
Published: Dec 19, 2015
Author: Awr Hawkins
Post Date: 2015-12-19 19:56:54 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 2976
Comments: 29

On December 18, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio referenced President Obama’s pending executive action on gun control and said executive order or not, guns will not be surrendered.

Arpaio talked with Breitbart News about a number of gun-related issues and indicated that an ongoing problem is that guns and gun control have become part of the “political situation.” As a result, Democrats react to the criminal misuse of guns by grandstanding to punish law-abiding citizens with gun control.

The same thing happens after a terror attack, such as the one that took place in San Bernardino on December 2. Since then, Democrats have pushed to add the no-fly list to background checks, to expand background checks, to pass an “assault weapons” ban, and to institute and fund a national gun buyback.

Now, Jen Psaki, White House communications director, says executive action to go around Congress and expand gun control will be coming in “weeks, not months.”

Arpaio addressed this pending executive action, saying, “Obama does know we have the Second Amendment, right?” He added, “I’ve said it before. I’m not surrendering the guns. He can give an executive order saying we’ve got to collect the guns, and I’m not going to do it.”

Arpaio said that “there’d be a revolution” if a president ever issued such an order. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 28.

#1. To: cranky (#0)

If those on the so called " no fly list " are so dangerous, why have they not been arrested and incarcerated, instead of being allowed to run loose?

Stoner  posted on  2015-12-19   20:06:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Stoner (#1)

If those on the so called " no fly list " are so dangerous, why have they not been arrested and incarcerated, instead of being allowed to run loose?

Good point.

But, even if someone is on this "noflylist," the US government can not deny the right to keep and bear arms unless the "someone" has a felony in their background. Which means, this is a whole bunch of hot aire.

buckeroo  posted on  2015-12-19   20:28:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: buckeroo (#3) (Edited)

But, even if someone is on this "noflylist," the US government can not deny the right to keep and bear arms unless the "someone" has a felony in their background.

Exactly correct.

Citizens cannot be deprived of Rights except through due process of law. Being put on the no-fly list is done without any due process -- it's strictly handled within the executive branch with zero involvement of the judical branch. It's been so-far upheld because barring someone from flying on an airline has not been regarded as depriving one a right to travel.

The right to bear arms, however, is a right, so extending the no-fly list to include a no-gun list would mean a right would be deprived without due process.

For me it's an easy prediction that barring people on the no-fly list from buying a gun will fail any court review.

But Obama will try it anyway, because... what the hell, why not? No money out of his pocket.

Pinguinite  posted on  2015-12-19   21:59:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Pinguinite, *Bang List*, buckeroo (#7) (Edited)

the US government can not deny the right to keep and bear arms unless the "someone" has a felony in their background

Citizens cannot be deprived of Rights except through due process of law

The ex-con's due process in regard to their criminal conviction expires with the completion of their sentence. They served their time, and are no longer convicted criminals. There is no legal justification for infringing upon their right to keep and bear arms.

'68 GCA, and the Brady Act are unconstitutional infringements on the RKBA.

If they can take the rights of innocent ex-cons, they can take the right of anyone for any excuse, like putting you on a no-fly list, calling you a terrorist, evil doer, PTSD psycho Veteran, or whatever.

Either we're all free, or none of us are free.

Hondo68  posted on  2015-12-19   22:18:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: hondo68 (#10)

Either we're all free, or none of us are free.

You are, of course, referring to felon disenfranchisement. If you have been convicted of a felony, you have forfeited many, many rights and priviledges and it is near impossible to get them back. Is it right? I don't know; I think it should vary with the type of crime such as violent crime. But it is the way it is.

buckeroo  posted on  2015-12-20   6:16:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: buckeroo (#19)

Is it right? I don't know; I think it should vary with the type of crime such as violent crime. But it is the way it is.

That doesn't mean it is the way it is SUPPOSED TO BE UNDER OUR OWN LAWS,and it doesn't mean we should just accept it and move on.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-12-20   8:25:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: sneakypete (#25)

That doesn't mean it is the way it is SUPPOSED TO BE UNDER OUR OWN LAWS,and it doesn't mean we should just accept it and move on.

Take the fourteenth amendment as an example, UNDER THE US CONSTITUTION laws are formulated on the state and federal level. Amendment XIV, section 2., states:

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

So, "disenfranchisement" inhibits voting as a "right" and logically should inhibit other rights as well. I don't know about you but I am not arguing with the content of a 150 year old US Constitutional Amendment. Are you?

buckeroo  posted on  2015-12-20   10:19:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 28.

#29. To: buckeroo (#28)

or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.

WTH? That couldn't be more confusing if it were just a bunch of random words thrown together.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-12-20 19:57:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 28.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com