[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Rare Van Halen Leicestershire, Donnington Park August 18, 1984 Valerie Bertinelli Cameo

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Trump: I'm an evangelical, Cruz is Cuban
Source: Washington Examiner
URL Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/t ... ticle/2578224?custom_click=rss
Published: Dec 12, 2015
Author: Anna Giaritelli
Post Date: 2015-12-12 09:41:10 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 10568
Comments: 62

Donald Trump tweeted Friday morning that Texas Sen. Ted Cruz was planning an attack on him. He then questioned Cruz's religion and ties to Big Oil in comments Friday night.

"I am an evangelical. I'm a Christian. I'm a Presbyterian," Trump said to an Iowa town hall rally. In contrast, he said that while he personally liked Cruz, "not a lot of evangelicals come out of Cuba, in all fairness."

Trump may be feeling pressure from Cruz after the Texas senator snatched first place from the billionaire in a Monmouth University Poll released Monday. Cruz is also ranked first in the Washington Examiner's power rankings.

Trump went on to criticize Cruz's opposition to ethanol, saying it was because the first-term senator is loyal to the Lone Star state's oil industry who "give him a lot of money."

But for all the tough talk, Trump didn't say whether he would or wouldn't consider taking Cruz on as his vice president should he win the party's nomination.

There are less than two months until the Feb. 1 Iowa Caucus. Cruz and Trump's campaigns have said they will focus that time on connecting with voters in the primary state.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-21) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#22. To: sneakypete (#18)

I have been predicting since day 1 that he wouldn't be running after the primaries

You're lying.

Day one you was saying he really wasn't running. Then you said he wasnt filing financials. Then you said he wasn't filing FEC paperwork. Then you said he was afraid to debate and wouldn't show up. Then you said a whole bunch of other stuff. Now you are saying this.

Soon you will be sayin Trump won the nomination but he will not win. Then you will vote for Hillary. Because you have a lot in common with her. Gay marriage, abortion. Ok you just have those and probably more. But you don't agree with Trump on the second amendment. He is taking a conservative position. That must be one of the reasons you don't like him.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-12   19:28:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: tomder55 (#17)

Only someone who did not live in NYC before Rudy could claim he had few accomplishments.

Do you think stop and frisk is unconstitutional and a violation of peoples rights?

Do you think a police state to fight crime is a good idea or a bad one?

Guiliani was better then Bloomturd though.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-12   19:30:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: A K A Stone (#21)

Bernie Sanders lovers who live in junk yard trailer parks sound real silly claiming Trump never accomplished anything.

Lame. Your whole house would probably fit inside my workshop,and my workshop is paid for. So are all the tools and cars in it.

Also,I only owe 12 grand on my house and 8 acres of land.

Who's the bubba,bubba?

Next thing you're going to tell me is two men can be married.

Are you actually retarded,or just so stupid you only believe the things you want to believe?

Tell me,bubba,where does the US Constitution exempt homosexuals from having the same rights as everyone else? Why,people in this country are even free to believe in Holy Spooks if that's what it takes them to get through the day.

You sure are covetous of Trump.

You consistently continue to be wrong with everything you post. Unlike YOU,*I* don't covet wealth. Nor do I covet insanity,and Trump really is insane. No wonder you admire him.

That is why you want to burn for Bernie.

No being wrong isn't even good enough for you,so you have to start lying?

Tell me,bubba. What does your God say about bearing false witness? BTW,that means lying. I figured I'd save you from having to look it up.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-12-12   20:30:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: A K A Stone (#22)

I have been predicting since day 1 that he wouldn't be running after the primaries

You're lying.

YOU are the liar,not me.

Day one you was saying he really wasn't running.

Add the word "REALLY" between the word "wasn't" and the word "running",and that is what I was saying.

I will try to dumb this down to the your level. A false campaign isn't really running.

Then you said he wasnt filing financials.

A lie. I even wrote,and pissed you off enough to attack me with yet another lie for writing it,that Trump was NOT spending his own money,and had even billed his campaign/the government $700,000 for him using his private jet to campaign.

Then you said he wasn't filing FEC paperwork.

Another lie. He HAS to do that because it is required by law.

Then you said he was afraid to debate and wouldn't show up.

Who does he debate? All he does is flap his fat mouth and attack the other candidates. He gives speeches attacking the other candidates,he doesn't answer questions.

Will you become suicidal when he drops out? Who is the globlalist asshat you will support after he leaves? Will you be supporting his good friend Hillary Clinton?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-12-12   20:38:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: TooConservative (#1)

I would like for someone to directly ask Trump if he is a sinner and has ever asked God for forgiveness or salvation through Christ. I expect someone will get around to it, sooner than later.

You would like to hear his conversion account?

For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die; yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. (Romans 5:6-8)

redleghunter  posted on  2015-12-12   23:25:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Vicomte13 (#2)

If I voted based on religion, I'd be voting for Rubio or Christie.

Actually you have more of a choice.

Add Santorum, JEB! and Kasich to the list of Catholics of the Latin Rite.

For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die; yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. (Romans 5:6-8)

redleghunter  posted on  2015-12-12   23:27:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: redleghunter (#26)

You would like to hear his conversion account?

He has admitted that he never prays and has never asked for forgiveness at all.

I think that won't go unnoticed. Not in Iowa and South Carolina.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-12-13   3:33:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: A K A Stone (#23) (Edited)

Do you think stop and frisk is unconstitutional and a violation of peoples rights?

Do you think a police state to fight crime is a good idea or a bad one?

The 4th amendment protects against 'unreasonable ' searches . Stop and frisk does not violate that . Stop and frisk was only part of the crack down on quality of life crimes . Before Rudy NYC had become a cesspool of crime. Rudy changed the primary mission of the police department to preventing crime from happening rather than responding to it once it had occurred. Some of the things done was simple police scheduling . Detectives used to clock out at 5 PM ,just as most of the crimes were to occur. His police Commish William Bratton reorganized the NYPD, emphasizing a street crimes unit that moved around the city, flooding high-crime areas. He also brought modern management techniques to the force . It began compiling a computerized database ( Compstat)to track the city’s crime patterns and the effectiveness of the NYPD’s responses to them.

You can't argue with the results .There was a historic drop in crime with total crime down by some 64 percent during the Giuliani years,, and murder down 67 percent, from 1,960 in Dinky Dinkins’s last year to 640 in Rudy's last year. The number of cars stolen in New York City every year plummeted by 78,000. What libs fail to mention in their critique of his policing policies is that civilian complaints of excessive force by the NYPD declined from one complaint per ten officers to one per 19 officers. Meanwhile, shootings by cops declined by 50 percent and were far lower under Giuliani than under Dinkins ,and in fact lower than cities that boasted about their community policing policies. Those who claim the policies were racist fail to point out that the biggest beneficiaries were the minority communities . Rudy was delivering them equal protection under the law .In the majority Hispanic Washington Heights , murders dropped from 76 in 1993, Dinkins’s last year, to only 7 by Rudy’s last year, a decline of more than 90 percent.

But law enforcement was only a part of his management that was conservative .I can discuss welfare reform ,reorganization of city hall ,changing the budget ,providing the climate for new job creation in the city ,the complete restoration of the Time Square area ,tax cuts ,his hard ball negotiations with municipal unions ,his reforms on how city contracts were awarded .

Bottom line ,the combination of a safer city and a better budget environment ignited an economic boom. Safer streets meant that city residents would go out at night and spend money in restaurants ,theaters ,and clubs. Tourism soared . The city gained 430,000 new jobs.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

tomder55  posted on  2015-12-13   5:00:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: tomder55 (#29)

You can't argue with the results .There was a historic drop in crime with total crime down by some 64 percent during the Giuliani years,, and murder down 67 percent, from 1,960 in Dinky Dinkins’s last year to 640 in Rudy's last year. The number of cars stolen in New York City every year plummeted by 78,000. What libs fail to mention in their critique of his policing policies is that civilian complaints of excessive force by the NYPD declined from one complaint per ten officers to one per 19 officers. Meanwhile, shootings by cops declined by 50 percent and were far lower under Giuliani than under Dinkins ,and in fact lower than cities that boasted about their community policing policies. Those who claim the policies were racist fail to point out that the biggest beneficiaries were the minority communities . Rudy was delivering them equal protection under the law .In the majority Hispanic Washington Heights , murders dropped from 76 in 1993, Dinkins’s last year, to only 7 by Rudy’s last year, a decline of more than 90 percent.

I never wanted Rudy to do for America what he did for NYC but there is no arguing with the crime and police stats. Giuliani and Bratton deserve the credit for not only NYC but the revolution in policing across the country. They demonstrated how to make policing work again in metro areas.

This is yet another reason why I keep repeating myself: "Giuliani wasn't conservative enough in 2008 but Trump is in 2016?". I just can't believe that and I was quite opposed to Giuliani over gun control and abortion and other liberal positions. Which are the same positions that Trump held for decades until the last year when he suddenly becomes a huge pro-life and gun supporter. Very convenient.

But maybe the voters are more captivated by reality TV and The Donald Show than I realize. Perhaps 25%-30% of the GOP base really are that gullible.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-12-13   7:14:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: redleghunter (#27)

Actually you have more of a choice.

Add Santorum, JEB! and Kasich to the list of Catholics of the Latin Rite.

Yeah. Them too.

Not happening.

I don't disapprove of Santorum, but I know he's not going anywhere.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-12-13   9:40:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: TooConservative (#30)

I never wanted Rudy to do for America what he did for NYC but there is no arguing with the crime and police stats.

Yeah there is. Crime declined in America across the board during that time. There was no Giuliani in Detroit, but crime declined there also in the same time frame. Marion Barry was DC Mayor, and they never had a Giuliani, but crime declined there also.

Truth is that three things happened. One is that the country had a sustained period of prosperity and internal stability once Vietnam was was over the hill and gone. Sustained prosperity and stability caused property values to go way up in cities that still had an economic core: the criminals were priced out.

The second is more complicated. Crime spiked going into the Giuliani era because of general conditions in the country, but SPECIFICALLY because there were drug turf wars raging in every city as new, very aggressive Latin American drug cartel gangs fought with the older organized crime establishments and each other. It took a few years to sort out, but when crime was going down everywhere, it was because one side won the drug war and killed off or co-opted their rivals. Crime went up because the criminals were at war. It went down because the smartest violent criminals won the war and established themselves as the new bosses.

The third is an unpleasant reality. Roe v. Wade became the law of the land in 1973. 1991 was 18 years after Roe. Crime fell steadily and swiftly everywhere in America 18 years after Roe, and stayed lower afterwards, because the cohort of the criminal unborn was nipped in the bud.

That's why crime fell in New York, where Giuliani was channelling Mussolini and pretending that it was his aggressive behavior that was doing it. It's why crime fell in Detroit and Cleveland at the same time, even though those cities remained basket cases with utterly corrupt government.

In short, Giuliani stood on the beach and crowed most loudly, and took credit for the receding of the tide. Canute was more modest. And the tide went out on the empty beaches too.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-12-13   9:52:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: tomder55 (#29)

Stop and frisk does not violate that .

Yes it does.

You aren't constitutionally literate.

They did that kind of stuff in the Soviet Unionnot America.

You McGovern supporters are wweirdos.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   10:11:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: sneakypete (#25)

I will try to dumb this down to the your level. A false campaign isn't really running.

Pete you're just a dumb ass. You're not worht my time.

You're what is wrong with America. If we could just make sure no one was like you. The country woudld improve significantly.

Stay home on election day you're to stupid and dishonest for America.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   10:13:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: sneakypete (#25)

Another lie. He HAS to do that because it is required by law.

You said he isn't running. So why is he reqauired to do it by law.

Damned you're stupid.

No wonder your wife left you alone in the trailer park.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   10:14:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Vicomte13 (#32)

Truth is that three things happened.

You forgot a fourth: the states and the feds cracked down hard on crime by crackheads during that era. The Xlinton era is still held in low regard by many blacks because they consider that the Xlintons locked up a generation of young urban black men.

Even so, Giuliani had great results in New York, as with Times Square and other quality-of-life issues. He did a lot of stuff for NYC that pulled it out of the gutter. It had been a basketcase of a city since I was young and Giuliani made a big difference. Bloomberg had the sense to stay the course. De Blasio is just a disaster across the board.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-12-13   10:23:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: hondo68 (#14)

I actually thought McCain might have a chance at the end of the convention when he picked Palin. But then he made himself look like an idiot during the financial crisis and Palin fell for these trap interviews and it was over.

Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president

no gnu taxes  posted on  2015-12-13   10:36:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: A K A Stone (#33) (Edited)

Stop and frisk does not violate that . (4th amendment )

Yes it does.

You aren't constitutionally literate.

They did that kind of stuff in the Soviet Unionnot America.

Terry v. Ohio 1968 : SCOTUS held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous." The meaning of the exclusionary rule of the 4th is to protect persons from unreasonable searches and seizures aimed at gathering evidence, not searches and seizures for other purposes like prevention of crime or personal protection of police officers.

It's hilarious that you think this is a liberal position.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

tomder55  posted on  2015-12-13   11:04:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: tomder55 (#38)

Supreme court. Blacks are not people.

I don't care about lawyer spin. I care about the truth.

The supreme court said Obamacare is contitutional. So stop complaiing about it.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   11:07:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: tomder55 (#38)

and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

You have a second amendment right to be armed. Armed people are be definition dangerous.

Exercising one of your constittional rights doesn't take away another one.

That is just stupid.

I get it you are a big government anti liberty Republican.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   11:09:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: tomder55 (#38)

It's hilarious that you think this is a liberal position.

It's moronic that you think it is constitutional.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   11:10:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: tomder55 (#38)

Terry v. Ohio 1968 : SCOTUS held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous." The meaning of the exclusionary rule of the 4th is to protect persons from unreasonable searches and seizures aimed at gathering evidence, not searches and seizures for other purposes like prevention of crime or personal protection of police officers.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. -

There you have it the Supreme court lied. You boutht the lie because you are constitutionally illiterate. Let me explain it to you child.

The people have a right to be secxure in their person, houses, papers and effects. That is a right. A right to be secure. That means don't fuck with it. It says those rights sahll not be violated. It says no warrants shall be issued unless you have probable cause. So if they have probable cause they can do what? Can they search you? Look closely it doesn't say they can search gou if they have probable cause. It says that they have to get a warrant and it hos t be specific as to what they are searching for and where. Furthermore there has to be someone who swears to or affirms the suspicion.

It doesn't meant a pig fro New York on Gayianis orders get to violate peoles rights because they think it is reasonable. If you don't get it it is because you suck establishment cock, and are a liar.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   11:19:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Vicomte13, TooConservative, (#32)

In short, Giuliani stood on the beach and crowed most loudly, and took credit for the receding of the tide.

So how do you explain the 20% increase in the murder and violent crime rate in NYC since Sandinista Bill became Mayor ? Why have the Guardian Angels again taken to patrolling Central Park to combat the huge jump in crime in the park since he became mayor ?

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

tomder55  posted on  2015-12-13   11:30:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: tomder55 (#43)

So how do you explain the 20% increase in the murder and violent crime rate in NYC

Peoples hearts.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   11:32:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: A K A Stone (#42)

sorry ,you couldn't be more wrong . Police may search without a warrant if they have reason to fear for their safety or for the public's safety. The Fourth Amendment doesn't say warrants are required for all searches and seizures. Stop and frisk pat downs are one of many exceptions to the warrant requirement. All the cop needs is reasonable suspicion that criminal activity may be afoot before the stop, or a reasonable suspicion someone may be armed and dangerous, before the frisk.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

tomder55  posted on  2015-12-13   11:48:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: A K A Stone (#44)

So how do you explain the 20% increase in the murder and violent crime rate in NYC Peoples hearts.

The Great Recession. We're going back to the economic mess of the 1970s, and the crime rates will rise proportionally with it.

Also, the country is wearing out from recession, as more and more people fall out of the middle class for good into the working poor, drug use rates go up, and with that, crime.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-12-13   13:36:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: TooConservative (#36)

I don't dispute that Giuliani was an effective Mayor of New York. He was very effective.

I just wanted to raise some points that puts Giuliani's crime record in perspective. Crime came down in Detroit, which didn't reform at all, during the same period that it came down in New York.

It's sort of like global warming. Certainly there is global WARMING. On Mars too! The seasonabl ice caps that used to be there when we were kids used to come a quarter of the way down the planet. They don't any more. Now they're pretty small. Meaning that the Martian globe has heated up.

The same is true with our monitoring of Venus. It's hotter and more turbulent than it was.

So, Venus, Earth and Mars are indeed hotting up. It's visible on the two other planets. It's visible with the eye on Mars with the drastic reduction in those ice caps. But global warming on Venus and Mars means that the global warming on earth ain't caused by SUVs.

Correlation is not causation. I guess that's ultimately my point. Giuliani CAUSED a great deal of renewal in New York, by targeted projects, outreach, an attitude, all that. But the decline in crime that occurred on his watch didn't entirely (or even mostly) occur because of his heavy-handed tactics. He got credit for it because of the timing, but he's an SUV, and he's not causing the ice caps on Mars to diminish.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-12-13   13:44:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: tomder55 (#45)

sorry ,you couldn't be more wrong . Police may search without a warrant if they have reason to fear for their safety or for the public's safety. The Fourth Amendment doesn't say warrants are required for all searches and seizures.

Quit lying. It is not a good trait.

Quote me from the constitution where it says you aren't secure in your papers person and effects. That you can be searched.

It doesn't say that. It says it is a right that you are secure in your person paper and effects.

You're just like the government assholes who take our lights by lying all the time.

Words have meanings.

Obamacare is the law of the land. Thanks to dumb asses who lie about the constitution just like you do.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   13:59:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: tomder55 (#45)

All the cop needs is reasonable suspicion that criminal activity may be afoot before the stop, or a reasonable suspicion someone may be armed and dangerous, before the frisk.

That may be all they need in practice. I will agree with that.

But it is still contrary to the very plain third grade words in the constition.

You can't make your case by using the words of the constittion. So you use the word of whores in black robes. Remember to tell everyone Obamacare is constitutional, because your Lords in black robes said so.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   14:09:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: hondo68 (#6)

The Donald might seem less creepy if he were Catholic too?

I don't find Trump creepy. I find him witty and entertaining, like a rich, thin Chris Christie.

If Trump were a Catholic, there are a lot of people who will vote for him now who wouldn't because they're bigots. So, because I want Trump in the White House, I'm glad he isn't Catholic. It avoids a whole nasty sideshow.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-12-13   15:02:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: A K A Stone (#4)

He would believe in 9 commandments not 10.

You don't post on the Internet on Saturday, because you keep the Sabbath? Oh, wait.

But it's ok to kill if you agree with the cause.

Looks to me like you believe in a maximum of 8 of the 10.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-12-13   15:05:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Vicomte13 (#50)

It isn't bigoted to point out that the Catholic church teaches many many incorrect things. Such as praying to mary and calling the sinner pope "holy father".

The false prophet will be a pope who gives credability to the antichrist.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   15:05:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: A K A Stone (#52)

It isn't bigoted to point out that the Catholic church teaches many many incorrect things. Such as praying to mary and calling the sinner pope "holy father".

The false prophet will be a pope who gives credability to the antichrist.

And what is the name of your denomination, so that we can also go through its litany of errors and historical sins?

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-12-13   15:06:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Vicomte13 (#51)

You don't post on the Internet on Saturday, because you keep the Sabbath? Oh, wait.

Is that the standard you judge by? Because if so it is the standard you will be judged by.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   15:07:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Vicomte13 (#53)

And what is the name of your denomination, so that we can also go through its litany of errors and historical sins?

I'm non denominational like Jesus and the apostles.

The Bible says what it says and means what it means. The word of God is God.

I know you said in the past that it is just words. Or something to that affect. That is how I intrepreted what you said a few weeks ago.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   15:08:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Vicomte13 (#53)

And what is the name of your denomination, so that we can also go through its litany of errors and historical sins?

Are you acknowledging that what I said is true?

You know the Catholics calling the pope "holy father". Praying to mary. Removing the commandment on idols from the 10 commandments.

Because if you can't acknowledge truth then what is the point of having a discussion?

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   15:11:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Vicomte13 (#51)

But it's ok to kill if you agree with the cause.

I never ever said it is ok to kill if you believe in a cause.

I just said that the Bible doesn't teach that those who live by the sword die by the sword.

If you are referring to murderers being in Heaven. Then you are even more wrong then I thought. Because you can ask for forgiveness for sins.

Not like I saw you say in the past. That you have a license to sin. You didn't use those words but that was what your words meant.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   15:13:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Vicomte13 (#46)

I know a lot of kids my age (15-18) engage in drug use

ebonytwix  posted on  2015-12-13   16:30:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: hondo68 (#6)

Cruz would be less creepy if he were a Catholic.

The Donald might seem less creepy if he were Catholic too?

LOL...

Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!

CZ82  posted on  2015-12-13   18:12:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: A K A Stone (#35)

Another lie. He HAS to do that because it is required by law.

You said he isn't running. So why is he reqauired to do it by law.

Damned you're stupid.

No matter how stupid I am,I am still smarter than you.

Even a FAKE campaign designed to get bribes and other favors for ruining the chances of other candidates and helping his (AND by extension,your) good pals the Clintons back into the WH has to register as a candidate or he can't get matching funds,can't charge himself and get paid for using his own jet,etc,etc,etc.

Trump is insane and you are stupid,so I guess that is a marriage made in heaven. Especially since he has now came out as an Evangelical.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-12-13   18:52:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: sneakypete (#60)

Even a FAKE campaign designed to get bribes and other favors for ruining the chances of other candidates and helping his (AND by extension,your) good pals the Clintons back into the WH has to register as a candidate or he can't get matching funds,can't charge himself and get paid for using his own jet,etc,etc,etc.

blah blah blah blah.

Stick to what you know. Go smoke a pole.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-12-13   19:43:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: A K A Stone (#61)

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-12-13   19:46:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com