[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
LEFT WING LOONS Title: Wake judge rules against teen facing off against NC on climate change From left, Mark Turner, (background) father of Hallie Turner, attorneys Gayle Tuch and Ryke Longest, 13 year old plaintiff Hallie Turner and Turner's mom, Kelly Turner and attorney Shannon Arata stand before Wake Judge Michael Morgan in Wake County Civil Courtroom 5C November 13, 2015 on a motion to force the state of North Carolina to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Hallie Turner, 13, is an 8th grader at Raleigh's Ligon Middle School. Hallie Turner, the 13-year-old girl who took North Carolina to court over climate change, received disappointing news the day before Thanksgiving. A Wake County Superior Court judge ruled against her effort to overturn a December 2014 decision by the N.C. Environmental Management Commission. But with the pluck of a teen wise beyond her years, Hallie said Friday the ruling from Judge Mike Morgan had not deterred her. Its an issue that Im always going to continue trying to make a difference in, Hallie said during a phone interview. Theres lots of next steps that can be taken. Hallie, an eighth-grader at Ligon Middle School who has been marching and rallying against global warming since the 4th grade, is one of a number of teens taking their states and politicians to court over climate change. With the help of lawyers from Our Childrens Trust, an Oregon-based climate change non-profit, attorneys from Duke Universitys Environmental Law and Policy Clinic, and Gayle Goldsmith Tuch, a Forsyth County lawyer, Hallie petitioned the state Environmental Management Commission to adopt rules that would reduce greenhouse gases. Commission members are appointed by the governor and leaders of the N.C. Senate and House of Representatives. In her petition almost a year ago to the 15 members of the commission, Hallie asked for a rule that would require North Carolina to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by at least 4 percent annually. The commissioners never got to the crux of her request, which included scientific data and more to support her theory for why the state should curb greenhouse gas emissions. Commissioner Benne Hutson rejected Hallies petition because he said it was incomplete. He also added that North Carolina law prohibited environmental agencies from enacting state laws stricter than federal law. Earlier this month, the commission adopted a proposal from the state Department of Environmental Quality that is much less stringent than what was suggested by Hallie and the attorneys who helped her draft her petition. After waiving the routine 30-day comment period, the commission adopted a rule to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at Duke Energy power plants by 0.4 percent. A strategy put forward by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency would require a 12-percent reduction by 2030. Tuch, one of Hallies lawyers, said Friday she did not know why Morgan ruled against her. Morgan has not yet issued his formal order. It is expected in couple of weeks. As the state gears up for an expected legal battle over the greenhouse gas emissions strategy adopted earlier this month, Hallie and her legal team are thinking about next steps in their case. Several options are under consideration, including an appeal of Morgans ruling or taking a different petition to the Environmental Management Commission that might clear the hurdle as complete and something the 15 members could put out for public review. Hallie said the judicial process has been educational. Its connected to so many things that Ive been learning at school in social studies, she said. Hallies parents have learned a lot, too. When numerous media outlets shared news about the Wake County court hearing earlier this month, the Turners were amazed by some of the negative comments posted on the sites. Commenters who challenged the idea of global warming accused the adults supporting Hallie of exploitation. Some directed derogatory comments at the teen, too. My reaction was just a bit of astonishment that people were that trivial and bitter, said Kelly Turner, Hallies mother. Mark Turner, a regular blogger on city issues and more, singled out some of the comments on a post he wrote about the experience. Hallie brushed off the downside to her activism. She maintains that she was not pushed into filing the petition or lawsuit. The adults who have been beside her are mentors and supporters, but the impetus is her own, she said. The comments dont really bother me, she said. What troubled her, Hallie said, were the commenters who questioned scientific data that she contends bolster her push for change. Hallie encouraged people disappointed in Morgans ruling to turn out for a Dec. 17 hearing at the Archdale Building in Raleigh. The hearing is to get feedback on the energy strategy adopted earlier this month by the Environmental Management Commission. Climate change is too urgent for any of us to sit quietly while the state fails to take significant action, Hallie said. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#2. To: cranky (#0)
(Edited)
I would have thought there were more important issues for a thirteen year old. Climate Change policy is more important than a school project and yet this trivilises the debate and the debate must be about facts not emotive actions. The fact is a reduction of 4% won't make any difference to overall emissions, even cumulative reductions of 4% would be overtaken by other initiatives, the federal regulators are capable of making the rules based on facts and science taking into consideration other importants factors. why should a teen ager be allowed to waste the time of the court litigating against authority
#5. To: paraclete (#2)
Exactly. Like sex, drugs and rock & roll.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|