WORLD WAR III
See other WORLD WAR III Articles
Title: Bill Maher on Terror Attacks: Wouldn’t Being Armed at Least Give Citizens a Chance?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw ... rce=facebook&utm_medium=social
Published: Nov 21, 2015
Author: by AWR Hawkins
Post Date: 2015-11-21 20:00:54 by Don
Keywords: None
Views: 5465
Comments: 28
During the November 20 airing of Real Time with Bill Maher, California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) pro-gun control comments were countered by Maher’s observation that being armed during a Paris-style attack would at least give citizens a fighting chance to survive. According to MRC/Newsbusters, Maher stepped in to defend the option of being armed for self-defense after Newsom dismissed the idea of a good guy with a gun having any real success against bad guys with guns. Newsom said, “I just simply, this sort of mythology, the guy with the gun that’s going to come save the day, I mean, so right out of the movies, sort of this gun-slinging fantasy. The reality is, it’s most likely to create more harm, more damage, more lost lives in those circumstances.” Surprised by Newsom’s willingness to accept the paradigm of citizens remaining unarmed in such a setting, Maher responded, “Really? So if you were in a restaurant and a crazy gunman came in, you wouldn’t want to have a gun? You’d rather just be shot?” Newsom responded by suggesting that citizens without proper training might just start shooting in response and make things worse. They might get nervous and “start pointing the trigger or pointing a gun and shooting.” Again, Maher countered by trying to get Newsom to listen to himself. Maher said, “But hasn’t the worst thing already happened? A crazed madman who’s bent on killing everyone? How could it get worse?” Maher’s contention was clear—at least being armed would give citizens a fighting chance. Follow AWR Hawkins on Twittter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Read More Stories About: Big Hollywood, Jihad, 2nd Amendment, gun control, Second Amendment, Bill Maher, Gavin Newsom
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Don (#0)
Being armed doesn't give you any more chance, if a terrorist or group of terrorists begins shooting at you with a military weapon are you going to shoot back or duck for cover? If a suicide bomber detonates a vest nearby how will being armed help you? This is the falacy of the armed debate. If a local militia is being formed because there is a clear enemy then being armed may help you. The real question in these situations is what training do you have and do you place yourself at greater risk by becoming a combatant, even a risk of being misidentified by police
Well, I imagine that when a terrorist is firing at a bunch of people, someone might have a chance to get off some rounds. It beats going belly up and letting someone shoot you. The French did that. It didn't work so well for them.
Psalm 37 PRAY FOR PARIS
Exactly. Let us all welcome Sharia Law while prostrating ourselves to Mecca.
If a suicide bomber detonates a vest nearby how will being armed help you? Hopefully both. How will being unarmed hamburger meat help? Try to take him out, PRIOR to the vest detonating. Well, you can remain an unarmed sheep if you want. I will take my chances by being armed.
Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. There are no Carthaginian terrorists. “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.” - George S. Patton
Hmm. Maher seems to be pulling his head out of his arse a little more each week.
Maher seems to be pulling his head out of his arse a little more each week. Not so much, he folded like a cheap suit. Some good news for Maher. It seems he is growing tired of the liberals he has on the show. Maybe he is coming around and seeing he is grouped with a bunch of dull whitted masochists. "Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near"---Isaiah 55:6
The question is whether you are in your head or in reality. a well trained person might get in a shot anyoneelse just becomes a greater target and you won't know whether the person next to you has a suicide vest or not so a gun is no defense unless the dope is just standing there waiting. The french has no ability to defend because in the ordinary course of events who would be armed anyway. it is a nonsense that people should go around armed it just gives the terrorist more opportunity because they will be less obvious. You need to learn that if it is your time you will go anyway and if it's not you will survive. No amount of bravado will save you, it is a myth of a macho gun mad society
Yes there is risk. Given certain death of family and neighboring innocent blood, I would take risk over certain bloodshed. I believe we have a brain between our ears for a reason. So I will take risk over most certain death. If I had the means to save a child, my own family any innocent bystanders and had a gun, I'm taking the shot. If the cops show up the gun goes to the floor. No fallacy in the armed debate. The absolute for armed response is sound, but your argument focuses on the particulars. You added military style weapons and suicide vests. Yes difficult to counter for someone who buys a gun, carries it and has no training. Training is responsible gun ownership. I can assure you I would be able to take a pistol and dispatch a terrorist with an assault rifle. And yes I have the training to do so. I truly believe the authors of the Constitution did not craft the 2nd Amendment with the thought that the mentally ill and incompetent should be armed to the teeth. That is not even a matter of law. It is basic adult responsibility. Also every gun owner I know are retired or former military. Even with years of training in fire arms most still take the NRA safety and shooting instruction. "Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near"---Isaiah 55:6
There are smart ways of reducing risk. One is: If you own a gun and conceal carry, you have a responsibility to know how to properly fire the weapon. "Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near"---Isaiah 55:6
It is not a myth. I'd like to blow the head off of anyone who would deny real Americans their right to possess the arms of their choice.
Do you believe if you have the means to protect innocent blood you have a moral obligation to defend such? Not really asking for an answer but making a point. It is a conscience decision. If there is an active shooter in a museum full of children I would be compelled to defend them with my life. Notice I did not say if I had a gun. But if I did it would improve my chances of successful defense. No bravado there I assure you. Just how I am wired. Ducking down under the table when I have the means to stop the shedding of blood is not how I am wired. I respect your decision to act as your conscience directs in a hostile situation. "Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near"---Isaiah 55:6
So you agree that it is ridiculous for the police to be similarly armed, correct? Because your argument is stating that it is useless to have a gun because it makes you a target and will get you killed, not make you safer. I also like the line "You need to learn that if it is your time you will go anyway and if it's not you will survive." Try telling that to the police with the "officer safety" mentality! --Paraclete obviously believes that *all* of society should be unarmed and ready for the terrorist to provide you with your time to die. Although possibly mis-attributed to Isoroku Yamamoto about attacking the American mainland, this quote does make a valid point - an enemy that fears its adversaries unknown strength thinks twice before attacking. On the other hand, an enemy that knows the adversary's weakness will take full advantage of such fact. Just put a sign out in your front lawn proclaiming that: "This is a gun-free property - Terrorist are welcome!"
Americans are in the habit of protecting themselves when necessary. Many of us have been dumbed down and turned into wimps. It would be a mistake to think that applies to all Americans. For the terrorists it might well be a fatal error. If you want to carry a doll in place of a weapon, feel free to do so.
Psalm 37 PRAY FOR PARIS
I would consider the above axiomatic. "Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near"---Isaiah 55:6
Yeah, I have talked to a few gun carriers. There can be a cowboy mentality concerning the use of firearms. Gun carriers have to not only know the proper functioning of the weapon, they have to know when to use it.
Psalm 37 PRAY FOR PARIS
Yep, just couldn't quite clear the sphincter could he.
Strasser: What is your nationality? Rick: I'm a drunkard. Renault: And that makes Rick a citizen of the world. Rick: I was born in New York City if that'll help you any. Strasser: I understand that you came here from Paris at the time of the occupation .Rick: Well, there seems to be no secret about that. Strasser: Are you one of those people who cannot imagine the Germans in their beloved Paris? Rick: It's not particularly my beloved Paris. Heinz: Can you imagine us in London? Rick: When you get there, ask me! Renault: Hmmh! Diplomatist! Strasser: How about New York? Rick: Well there are certain sections of New York, Major, that I wouldn't advise you to try to invade. (Casablanca) Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Mr. Newsom claims we are arming terrorists because the 2,000 people on the no- fly list are allowed to buy guns. If they're terrorists, why aren't they arrested? Answer: Because they're not terrorists. Their name is on that list because the TSA made a “predictive assessment about a potential threat”. "Pre-crime" for fans of Minority Report. Meaning people are on this secret list because someone at TSA thought they should be. And Mr. Newson believes that's reason enough to deny someone their second amendment right to keep and bear arms. How long before that no-fly list is expanded to 200,000 names? 2 million names?
Is it possible there are TWO Bill Mahers,one I have never heard about before this report? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
Yeah,and people die from falling up buildings every day. if a terrorist or group of terrorists begins shooting at you with a military weapon are you going to shoot back or duck for cover? I'm going to shoot back,and once I do,I will then have a nifty little military weapon of my own to shoot any other terrorists with. If a suicide bomber detonates a vest nearby how will being armed help you? Well,if *I* see a suicide bomber getting ready to set off his or her charge,and since almost all of them are drama queens that make sure people are watching them before they vaporize,I'll just shoot the MoFo in the melon. People with bullets in their brains don't push buttons. I suppose your next question is going to be,"What if you are walking around outside or sitting in a building where a airliner impacts after a terrorist sets off a bomb in it?",and then you are going to suggest we all just surrerder and bet the Muslim loons for mercy. Have you been a professional victim looking for a strong master all your life,or is this something new? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
Is it possible that you are really so full of shit that you believe that nonsense,or are you just having a little fun pulling people's legs? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
I don't. He is a floating turd in the toilet bowl of life,and needs to be flushed. He will be happy when it happens,and it will make the world a slightly better place when it does. Win-Win. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
He's just trolling... Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
No,he doesn't. He is a Lt Gov and has been fully briefed on how and why people's names end up on the No Fly list. He is lying and he KNOWS it. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
This piece surprised me too. Maybe, twins? Perhaps, a good one and an evil twin?
Psalm 37 PRAY FOR PARIS
If he wants to die by being shot in the back of the head while he's hiding/crying behind some fat woman then let him...
Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
citizens without proper training might just start shooting in response and make things worse. They might get nervous and “start pointing the trigger or pointing a gun and shooting
#2. To: paraclete (#1)
#3. To: paraclete (#1)
Being armed doesn't give you any more chance ...
#4. To: paraclete, *Bang List* (#1)
if a terrorist or group of terrorists begins shooting at you with a military weapon are you going to shoot back or duck for cover?
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#5. To: paraclete (#1)
#6. To: Don (#0)
#7. To: VxH (#6)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#8. To: Don (#0)
#9. To: Don (#2)
#10. To: paraclete (#1)
Being armed doesn't give you any more chance, if a terrorist or group of terrorists begins shooting at you with a military weapon are you going to shoot back or duck for cover? If a suicide bomber detonates a vest nearby how will being armed help you? This is the falacy of the armed debate. If a local militia is being formed because there is a clear enemy then being armed may help you. The real question in these situations is what training do you have and do you place yourself at greater risk by becoming a combatant, even a risk of being misidentified by police
#11. To: Don (#2)
Well, I imagine that when a terrorist is firing at a bunch of people, someone might have a chance to get off some rounds. It beats going belly up and letting someone shoot you. The French did that. It didn't work so well for them.
#12. To: paraclete (#9)
#13. To: paraclete (#9)
The french has no ability to defend because in the ordinary course of events who would be armed anyway. it is a nonsense that people should go around armed it just gives the terrorist more opportunity because they will be less obvious. You need to learn that if it is your time you will go anyway and if it's not you will survive. No amount of bravado will save you, it is a myth of a macho gun mad society
#14. To: paraclete (#9)
it is a nonsense that people should go around armed it just gives the terrorist more opportunity because they will be less obvious. You need to learn that if it is your time you will go anyway and if it's not you will survive. No amount of bravado will save you, it is a myth of a macho gun mad society
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."
#15. To: paraclete (#9)
(Edited)
#16. To: TheFireBert (#14)
an enemy that fears its adversaries unknown strength thinks twice before attacking. On the other hand, an enemy that knows the adversary's weakness will take full advantage of such fact.
#17. To: redleghunter (#11)
#18. To: hondo68 (#7)
#19. To: paraclete (#1)
#20. To: hondo68 (#7)
#21. To: Don (#0)
During the November 20 airing of Real Time with Bill Maher, California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) pro-gun control comments were countered by Maher’s observation that being armed during a Paris-style attack would at least give citizens a fighting chance to survive.
#22. To: paraclete (#1)
Being armed doesn't give you any more chance,
#23. To: paraclete (#9)
it is a nonsense that people should go around armed it just gives the terrorist more opportunity because they will be less obvious. You need to learn that if it is your time you will go anyway and if it's not you will survive. No amount of bravado will save you, it is a myth of a macho gun mad society
#24. To: redleghunter, paraclete (#13)
I respect your decision to act as your conscience directs in a hostile situation.
#25. To: sneakypete (#22)
Have you been a professional victim looking for a strong master all your life,or is this something new?
#26. To: misterwhite (#20)
Meaning people are on this secret list because someone at TSA thought they should be. And Mr. Newson believes that's reason enough to deny someone their second amendment right to keep and bear arms.
#27. To: sneakypete (#21)
#28. To: sneakypete (#22)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]