New World Order
See other New World Order Articles
Title: Trump's Rivals Can Ask for 12 Minutes of Their Own NBC Airtime
Source:
Fortune
URL Source: http://fortune.com/2015/11/09/trump-nbc-snl/
Published: Nov 10, 2015
Author: Jonathan Chew
Post Date: 2015-11-10 13:11:28 by Hondo68
Ping List: *2016 The Likely Suspects* Subscribe to *2016 The Likely Suspects*
Keywords: Communications Act, Equal Time Rule
Views: 5016
Comments: 33
After Donald Trump’s much-hyped appearance on NBC’s Saturday Night Live, other Republican presidential candidates can now ask NBC for their own time in the TV spotlight. That’s because Trump’s appearance on the NBC show has triggered a seven-day window where rivals can request equal airtime on the channel. Trump’s total time onscreen, which came in at around 12 minutes, was first filed to the Federal Communications Commission by NBC’s New York affiliate, WNBC TV. First reported by Variety, this rule under Section 315 of the Communications Act is commonly known as the “Equal Time Rule” and was drafted into the Act so radio and TV stations would be unable to influence elections by refusing airtime to candidates of their choosing. Anyone interested in equal time has to show they are viable, bona fide candidates running in the race. NBC is not required to put them in the same program, but candidates like Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush may consider trying to host a future episode—Trump’s SNL showing scored the highest ratings for the program since 2012. Poster Comment: A 12 minute rebuttal to Donald Trump and his NWO backers at SNL. Paul, Cruz, Carson, and Gary Johnson could combine their time into a special.... 
Aidy Bryant and Donald Trump during his monologue on "Saturday Night Live" They have a week to ask.
Subscribe to *2016 The Likely Suspects*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68, All (#0)
This is nothing but a gift to Hillary. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
No loss there.
Makes no difference at all. Anytime she wants to guest host SNL,all she has to do is have one of her minions make a phone call,and not only does she guest host,but her staff get to write all the jokes,all the questions asked of her,and all the responses. Those were her conditions for appearing on Letterman even the first time. Hell,her staff wrote the Top Ten Questions and answers,as well as every interview question and answer. They also got to fill the audience with Clinton supporters so no boos would be heard. That was the last time I ever watched Letterman. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Exactly and no Rep candidate can say word one about it. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
I think NBC's lawyers will maintain that Trump was there as a longstanding NBC celebrity, not as a politician. You notice they actually avoided most anything that was political, even though there were plenty of good jokes to write at the expense of other campaigns. No way that NBC's lawyers didn't take this into account in advance. No way that NBC intends to be forced to give away 12 minutes to each of the other 14-15 candidates in the race. Therefore, NBC and their lawyers are confident that they can persuade the FCC that Trump was on the show as a celebrity (and previous 2004 host) and there was nothing political about it.
Not all airtime is equal. They'll get 12 minutes on some show in the middle of the night with 7 drunk insomniacs watching. The catch is that they have to do 12 minutes of un-funny skits .
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Does this mean Trump gets equal time on CNN?
"Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near"---Isaiah 55:6
This does not do squat for Hillary. Only other contenders for the Republican nomination are affected at this primary stage.
They do not have to let them host SNL. They could give 12 mins 5 Sec of coverage of one of their campaign events. There may be a question of how many actually qualify and where. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/73.1940 (a) A legally qualified candidate for public office is any person who: (2) Is qualified under the applicable local, State or Federal law to hold the office for which he or she is a candidate; and (3) Has met the qualifications set forth in either paragraph (b), (c), (d), or (e) of this section. (b) A person seeking election to any public office including that of President or Vice President of the United States, or nomination for any public office except that of President or Vice President, by means of a primary, general or special election, shall be considered a legally qualified candidate if, in addition to meeting the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, that person: (2) Has publicly committed himself or herself to seeking election by the write-in method and is eligible under applicable law to be voted for by sticker, by writing in his or her name on the ballot or by other method, and makes a substantial showing that he or she is a bona fide candidate for nomination or office. (c) A person seeking election to the office of President or Vice President of the United States shall, for the purposes of the Communications Act and the rules in 47 CFR chapter I, be considered legally qualified candidates only in those States or territories (or the District of Columbia) in which they have met the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section: Except, that any such person who has met the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section in at least 10 States (or 9 and the District of Columbia) shall be considered a legally qualified candidate for election in all States, territories, and the District of Columbia for the purposes of this Act. (d) A person seeking nomination to any public office, except that of President or Vice President of the United States, by means of a convention, caucus or similar procedure, shall be considered a legally qualified candidate if, in addition to meeting the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, that person makes a substantial showing that he or she is a bona fide candidate for such nomination: Except, that no person shall be considered a legally qualified candidate for nomination by the means set forth in this paragraph prior to 90 days before the beginning of the convention, caucus or similar procedure in which he or she seeks nomination. (e) A person seeking nomination for the office of President or Vice President of the United States shall, for the purposes of the Communications Act and the rules thereunder, be considered a legally qualified candidate only in those States or territories (or the District of Columbia) in which, in addition to meeting the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section: (2) He or she has made a substantial showing of a bona fide candidacy for such nomination in that State, territory or the District of Columbia; except, that any such person meeting the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section in at least 10 States (or 9 and the District of Columbia) shall be considered a legally qualified candidate for nomination in all States, territories and the District of Columbia for purposes of this Act. (f) The term “substantial showing” of a bona fide candidacy as used in paragraphs (b), (d) and (e) of this section means evidence that the person claiming to be a candidate has engaged to a substantial degree in activities commonly associated with political campaigning. Such activities normally would include making campaign speeches, distributing campaign literature, issuing press releases, maintaining a campaign committee, and establishing campaign headquarters (even though the headquarters in some instances might be the residence of the candidate or his or her campaign manager). Not all of the listed activities are necessarily required in each case to demonstrate a substantial showing, and there may be activities not listed herein which would contribute to such a showing. [57 FR 27708, June 22, 1992]
(f) ..... Such activities normally would include making campaign speeches, distributing campaign literature, issuing press releases, maintaining a campaign committee, and establishing campaign headquarters (even though the headquarters in some instances might be the residence of the candidate or his or her campaign manager). Not all of the listed activities are necessarily required in each case to demonstrate a substantial showing, and there may be activities not listed herein which would contribute to such a showing. Doesn't Hillary fit those requirements? Bernie is both an Independent and a Democrat, so he gets 24 minutes to preach communism? Lots of loopholes in (f), but not enough to make Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal eligible. Radio Havana might welcome them, though. The Democrats have taken a break from running illegal aliens, but the Republicans stubbornly cling to their reconquistas, and Catholic Hindu anchor babies. That isn't fair to Jindal. His parents were already here legally, his mother as a physicist and his father as an engineer (as I recall it).
NBC will use this to say that it offer equal time to the Reps when they give time to Hillary closer to the last primaries and therefore only doing for her what it did for the Rep candidates. It doesn't matter that it would not de facto be equal bur preferential treatment for their Queen. It's just the facade that will count because no-one in the MSM will report on it, much less complain about it. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
That isn't fair to Jindal Keep pretending that Obongo is president, and Biden is VP. The reason Biden isn't running for president? He's already served two terms as President! Regarding Bobby Jindal’s parents, they were not U.S. citizens when their son was born. “They were both permanent legal residents at the time of his birth,” Plotkin told WND. “They became citizens after his birth.” Plotkin says Jindal’s mother became a U.S. citizen Sept. 21, 1976, and his father was naturalized 10 years later on Dec. 4, 1986. It’s a similar situation for Rubio, as his press secretary Alex Burgos said the senator’s parents “were permanent legal residents of the U.S.” at the time Marco was born in 1971. Then four years after Marco was born, “Mario and Oriales Rubio became naturalized U.S. citizens on Nov. 5, 1975,” Burgos told WND. Read more at www.wnd.com/2011/05/297485/#RH4yp13XUB7E2o46.99 My dead dawg Scruffy asks: "Where's the bones?" to Donald Trump's plans to make America Great Again?
The Donald may give us a clue in the GOP Fox Business debate. Be sure to use your decoder ring! They were legal. Resident aliens. IOW, green card holders. It is the routine path to becoming a naturalized citizen.
All my dead dawg Scruffy wants is to speak out for all freedom loving Americans. No more free bones!
Why does every cracker commentator have whiskers? And that bimbo in the middle, what's up with that? Reminds me of a Saturday morning show with farm animals and aliens commenting on a B minus movie from the old days.
She's a cutie pie, ain't she? Maybe, just maybe I shall vote for her.
Her outfit is - how can I say this - she looks like a crack ho with nice gams.
She is perfect for POTUS!
Rand Paul is a clear winner.
Bet on Bitcoin. Watch and see. Trump is alluding to it. Bimbo's shoe apparel is lacking.
Fred - please quit complaining. I want her to wear less. If I could just get her name, I shall use her name as a write-in candidate.
The info hottie! Fred seems more interested in farm animals than bimbos? Rubio is getting beaten to a pulp by Rand for being a big spending warfare/welfare bushbot globalist progressive. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_Science_Theater_3000 This is what I was thinking of...no farm animals involved.
It's totally irrelevant to the citizenship of a child. Every child born within the territory and jurisdiction of the United States is born a U.S. citizen pursuant to the 14th Amendment. The Constitution does not mention the status of the parents as a consideration.
Hillary is a candidate for the nomination of the Democratic party. If they put Bernie on SNL, then she could ask for an opportunity for time. If Trump and Hillary were the actual nominees of their party, then a Trump appearance would be an issue for Hillary.
My point being that Jindal's parents had already achieved permanent resident alien status and they had no motive to have Bobby as an anchor baby the way that illegal aliens or visa-overstayers do.
Letterman??? Who's that??? Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
After Donald Trump’s much-hyped appearance on NBC’s Saturday Night Live, other Republican presidential candidates can now ask NBC for their own time in the TV spotlight.
#2. To: hondo68 (#0)
"NBC is not required to put them in the same program ..."
#3. To: SOSO (#1)
This is nothing but a gift to Hillary.
#4. To: sneakypete (#3)
Makes no difference at all. Anytime she wants to guest host SNL,all she has to do is have one of her minions make a phone call,and not only does she guest host,but her staff get to write all the jokes,all the questions asked of her,and all the responses.
#5. To: hondo68 (#0)
Anyone interested in equal time has to show they are viable, bona fide candidates running in the race. NBC is not required to put them in the same program, but candidates like Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush may consider trying to host a future episode—Trump’s SNL showing scored the highest ratings for the program since 2012.
#6. To: TooConservative, Boris and the 7 dwarfs, BorisY (#5)
No way that NBC intends to be forced to give away 12 minutes
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#7. To: hondo68 (#0)
#8. To: TooConservative (#5)
#9. To: SOSO, hondo68 (#1)
This is nothing but a gift to Hillary.
#10. To: TooConservative, hondo68 (#5)
No way that NBC intends to be forced to give away 12 minutes to each of the other 14-15 candidates in the race.
47 CFR 73.1940 - Legally qualified candidates for public office.
(1) Has publicly announced his or her intention to run for nomination or office;
(1) Has qualified for a place on the ballot; or
(1) He or she, or proposed delegates on his or her behalf, have qualified for the primary or Presidential preference ballot in that State, territory or the District of Columbia; or
#11. To: nolu chan, equal time, Hillary, Bernie X 2 (#10)
(e) A person seeking nomination for the office of President or Vice President of the United States
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#12. To: redleghunter, TooConservative (#8)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#13. To: hondo68 (#11)
and Catholic Hindu anchor babies
#14. To: nolu chan, hondo68 (#9)
This does not do squat for Hillary. Only other contenders for the Republican nomination are affected at this primary stage.
#15. To: TooConservative, usurper Obama, President Biden (#13)
(Edited)
Catholic Hindu anchor babies
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#16. To: hondo68 (#0)
Trump's Rivals Can Ask
#17. To: buckeroo (#16)
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#18. To: hondo68 (#15)
“They were both permanent legal residents at the time of his birth,” Plotkin told WND. “They became citizens after his birth.”
#19. To: hondo68 (#17)
Be sure to use your decoder ring!
#20. To: hondo68 (#17)
(Edited)
#21. To: Fred Mertz, hondo68 (#20)
And that bimbo in the middle, what's up with that?
#22. To: buckeroo (#21)
#23. To: Fred Mertz (#22)
#24. To: hondo68 (#17)
#25. To: buckeroo (#24)
#26. To: Fred Mertz (#25)
Bimbo's shoe apparel is lacking.
#27. To: buckeroo, Fred Mertz (#21)
She's a cutie pie, ain't she?
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#28. To: hondo68 (#27)
#29. To: TooConservative, hondo68 (#18)
They were legal. Resident aliens. IOW, green card holders.
#30. To: hondo68 (#11)
Doesn't Hillary fit those requirements?
#31. To: nolu chan (#29)
It's totally irrelevant to the citizenship of a child. Every child born within the territory and jurisdiction of the United States is born a U.S. citizen pursuant to the 14th Amendment. The Constitution does not mention the status of the parents as a consideration.
#32. To: sneakypete (#3)
That was the last time I ever watched Letterman.
#33. To: hondo68 (#11)
(Edited)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]