[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: MARCO RUBIO IS AN ANCHOR BABY AND NOT ELIGIBLE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://themarshallreport.wordpress ... eligible-to-run-for-president/
Published: Nov 4, 2015
Author: dianne marshall
Post Date: 2015-11-04 07:33:51 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 6954
Comments: 42

Yes you heard that right. At the time Marco Rubio was born in the United States neither of his parents were United States Citizens.

Rubio was born in Miami, Florida on May 28, 1971, the second son and third child of Mario Rubio and Oria Garcia. His parents were Cubans who had immigrated to the United States in 1956 and were naturalized as U.S. citizens in 1975!. That makes little Marco an anchor baby. Don’t expect him to think like the average American. He has now both said and shown us he doesn’t respect the office of the senate, and is not to be trusted to the office of President!

The question that remains is: DOES MARCO RUBIO MEET THE QUALIFICATIONS TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT?

The descriptive clause in the Constitution says this:

“Only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents at least one of whom was a U.S. citizen at the time) may serve president of the United States.” (see link below)

When Marco Rubio announced he was running, for president, Orly Taitz, and Mario Apuzzo (who both filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility) asserted that Mario Rubio was not eligible to run because he was born to parents who were not U.S. citizens at the time of his respective birth. They both publically asserted that Marco Rubio is not eligible.

To me it appears that the answer is NO, Rubio is not qualified. Why is the news silent on this one?

Oh and by the way, Rubio’s sob story for the campaign that his parents were Cuban refugees and fled to the US to escape the abusive power of Castro? He forgot to tell you that his family arrived in the US in 1956 and Castro did not rise to power until 1959. Another lie.


Poster Comment:

Oh and by the way, Rubio’s sob story for the campaign that his parents were Cuban refugees and fled to the US to escape the abusive power of Castro? He forgot to tell you that his family arrived in the US in 1956 and Castro did not rise to power until 1959. Another lie.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

#2. To: A K A Stone, NATURAL Born Citizen (#0)

The descriptive clause in the Constitution says this:

“Only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents at least one of whom was a U.S. citizen at the time) may serve president of the United States.” (see link below)

Unknown what the author is quoting, but it's NOT the US Constitution! "native-born" is not in there.


U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 1, Clause 5:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Hondo68  posted on  2015-11-04   8:32:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: hondo68 (#2) (Edited)

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

A lot of people miss this. It spells out that the Founders anticipated that a natural-born American citizens might live up to age 21 overseas and still be eligible to run as president.

Rubio is considered natural-born since that is how we have defined the 14th Amendment. We have legislatively altered the definition slightly several times because the Constitution simply says natural-born but does not exhaustively define the term.

..., or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,...

I always like how the Founders, themselves British subjects, grandfathered themselves into eligibility with this modest phrase.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-11-04   8:36:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: TooConservative (#3)

Rubio is considered natural-born since that is how we have defined the 14th Amendment.

Who is we? Nancy Pelosi certified that Barry Obama is qualified and a natural born citizen. The courts have never ruled on "natural born Citizen". The 14th doesn't specifically address natural born.

Ted Cruz was born in Canada, a Dual Citizen at birth. How can this be "natural born", most people are born with only one citizenship. Not so natural to the vast majority of people. Most people don't have two foreign citizen parents like Marco Rubio, either.

Rubio and Cruz's parents eventually became citizens, and Teddy dropped his Canadian citizenship a couple of years ago, but that doesn't make either of them natural born.

Hondo68  posted on  2015-11-04   11:00:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: hondo68, TooConservative (#6)

Who is we? Nancy Pelosi certified that Barry Obama is qualified and a natural born citizen.

The Congressional Research Service reaffirmed the early 2009 opinion in 2011 .

https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42097.pdf

Cittizenship at Birth: Case Law and Interpretations: The overwhelming evidence of historical intent, general understandings, and common law principles underlying American jurisprudence thus indicate that the most reasonable interpretation of “natural born” citizens would include those who are considered U.S. citizens “at birth” or “by birth,” either by the operation of the strict “common law” of jus soli derived from English common law (physically born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction, without reference to parentage or lineage), or under existing federal statutory law incorporating longstanding concepts of jus sanguinis, the law of descent, including those born abroad of U.S. citizen-parents. This general historical understanding and interpretation is supported, as well, by specific federal case law in the United States, and in official legal opinions of U.S. officers. Although the Supreme Court has not needed to rule specifically on the presidential eligibility clause, as discussed in more detail below, numerous federal cases, as well as state cases, for more than a century have used the term “natural born citizen” to describe a person born in this country and under its jurisdiction, even to parents who were aliens in the U.S.114 Additionally, several Supreme Court cases, as well as numerous constitutional scholars, have used the term “native born” citizen to indicate all of those children physically born in the country (and subject to its jurisdiction), without reference to parentage or lineage, and employed such term in reference to those citizens eligible to be President under the “natural born” citizenship clause, as opposed to “naturalized” citizens, who are not.115 In no currently controlling legal opinion in American jurisprudence has the citizenship or nationality of one’s parents or forebears been considered a determining factor in the eligibility of a native born U.S. citizen to be President, and no holding in any case in federal court has ever established a “two citizen-parent” requirement, or other requirement of lineage or bloodline, for a native born U.S. citizen to be eligible for the Presidency.

tomder55  posted on  2015-11-04   13:07:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: tomder55, half assed Americans (#8)

no holding in any case in federal court has ever established a “two citizen-parent” requirement, or other requirement of lineage or bloodline, for a native born U.S. citizen to be eligible for the Presidency.

There is ONE and only one circumstance where natural born Citizen is important, the office of US president. All other cases and rulings are irrelevant since they don't address the issue.

The courts refuse to rule on the presidential eligibility question.

Cuban student Rafael Cruz (center) in a pro-Castro parade at the University of Texas Austin in 1959. In 2005 he finally renounced his allegiance to Fidel and became a US citizen.
Senator Ted Cruz finally renounced his allegiance to the Queen and dropped his Canadian citizenship in 2013, in preparation for his presidential run.

Hondo68  posted on  2015-11-04   13:43:21 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: hondo68 (#9)

There is ONE and only one circumstance where natural born Citizen is important, the office of US president.

It is equally applicable to the Vice President. Cruz is a natural born U.S. citizen pursuant to Federal law in effect at the time of his birth.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-11-04   15:28:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: nolu chan (#13)

Cruz is a natural born U.S. citizen

He's not a natural born anything. He was born in Canada, but neither parent is Canadian. He's a hybrid, Cuban, Canadian, American. There can't be too many of those.

He might be popular at the UN as an unidentified citizen of the world.

Hondo68  posted on  2015-11-04   16:01:08 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: hondo68 (#14)

He's not a natural born anything. He was born in Canada, but neither parent is Canadian. He's a hybrid, Cuban, Canadian, American. There can't be too many of those.

Ted Cruz is a natural born U.S. citizen, pursuant to Federal law in effect at the time of his birth.

Ted Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, on Dec. 22, 1970.

His mother was a United States citizen significantly before and when he was born.

The law in effect at the time of birth of Ted Cruz was the Immigation and Nationality Act of 1952 (first amended 1978). Amendment history may be viewed at 8 U.S.C. 1401.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/content-detail.html

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66.pdf

P.L. 414, June 25, 1952

66 Stat 163 (to 282), Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952

Immigration and Nationality Act.

AN ACT To revise the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality ; and for other purposes.

66 Stat. 235, 236:

TITLE III-NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION

CHAPTER 1-NATIONALITY AT BIRTH AND BY COLLECTIVE NATURALIZATION

NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH

SEC. 301 . (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

[...]

(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements of this paragraph.

- - - - - - - - - -

http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen

Harvard Law Review Forum

On the Meaning of “Natural Born Citizen”

Commentary by Neal Katyal & Paul Clement

Mar 11, 2015

128 Harv. L. Rev. F. 161

The Constitution directly addresses the minimum qualifications necessary to serve as President. In addition to requiring thirty-five years of age and fourteen years of residency, the Constitution limits the presidency to “a natural born Citizen.” [1]

All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time. And Congress has made equally clear from the time of the framing of the Constitution to the current day that, subject to certain residency requirements on the parents, someone born to a U.S. citizen parent generally becomes a U.S. citizen without regard to whether the birth takes place in Canada, the Canal Zone, or the continental United States. [2]

- - - - -

1. U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 5.

2. See, e.g., 8 U.S.C. § 1401(g) (2012); Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Pub. L. No. 82-414, § 303, 66 Stat. 163, 236–37; Act of May 24, 1934, Pub. L. No. 73-250, 48 Stat. 797.

[...]

While the field of candidates for the next presidential election is still taking shape, at least one potential candidate, Senator Ted Cruz, was born in a Canadian hospital to a U.S. citizen mother. [15]

Despite the happenstance of a birth across the border, there is no question that Senator Cruz has been a citizen from birth and is thus a “natural born Citizen” within the meaning of the Constitution. Indeed, because his father had also been resident in the United States, Senator Cruz would have been a “natural born Citizen” even under the Naturalization Act of 1790.

- - - - -

15. See Monica Langley, Ted Cruz, Invoking Reagan, Angers GOP Colleagues But Wins Fans Elsewhere, Wall St. J. (Apr. 18, 2014, 11:36 PM), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303873604579494001552603692.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-11-04   18:58:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: nolu chan (#16)

What you posted has to be wrong. There are so many websites and blogs 'proving' you wrong. /s

redleghunter  posted on  2015-11-04   21:32:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: redleghunter (#24)

What you posted has to be wrong. There are so many websites and blogs 'proving' you wrong. /s

Yeah, it almost makes me wonder why all the court decisions and law books are so wrong.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-11-05   0:21:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 30.

        There are no replies to Comment # 30.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com